• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

What has Bush accomplished, really?

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Ozoned

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2004
5,578
0
0
An additional 1 % of the worlds population (50,000,000) now enjoys the ability to have a say in their own future through a little thing called voting.
 

Stunt

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2002
9,717
2
0
Iraq has 26million people, what other states are you counting, Ozoned?
 

kogase

Diamond Member
Sep 8, 2004
5,213
0
0
Originally posted by: Ozoned
Afghanistan.

Of course, reports out of Afghanistan suggest that Afghanistan still has its share of major problems. Most notably, warlords taking controls of large parts of the country and rampant discrimination and abuse of women.

Of course, the country is not as bad off as it was under the Taliban, and Bush was right to go in... he just didn't do a very good job over there either.
 

Stunt

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2002
9,717
2
0
I hear Afganistan's booming Opium production is the backbone of the economy. It's no wonder warloards have so much power, this is usually the case in a democracy, the people with the money run the show. Glad to see the taliban gone for sure, i wish the Afgan's could do more with regards to this power struggle.
 

1EZduzit

Lifer
Feb 4, 2002
11,833
1
0
Originally posted by: AnyMal
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Originally posted by: AnyMal
Originally posted by: BBond
NCLB isn't about higher standards. It's about teachers pounding answers to test questions into childrens' heads because funding depends on it. No learning going on. Just instruction by rote.

And this from a lifetime screw-up. How ironic Bush would be the one to demand testing others for complying with standards he ignored.

I fail to see the irony. But do humor us.

It's kind of like sending people to war when he was having his Daddy pull politcal strings so he wouldn't have to go to Vietnam when it was his time to serve.

It kind of like getting into an ivy league school, not based on his preformance, but his heritage.

I could go on, but if you don't see the irony, well then that's just ironic, isn't it.

Oh come frigging on! How many times we need to rehash something that has been scrutinized and repeated thousands of times.

How many pilots from Bush's unit were deployed to Vietnam? Do you know of any? If GWB was so affraid of war why did he join in the first place? Why did he choose to be a fighter pilot, one of the most dangerous occupations in the military? Wouldn't it make more sense to be on some desk detail? If his daddy was so powerful and he wanted to get him out of war, couldn't he get him out of serving alltogether? Couldn't he, like some others*cough*Clinton*cough*, just dodge it all together, escape to Canada, or go to anti-American rallies in Moscow (or wherever he went)?

Until the truth come out, and it will eventually. Everyone knows about the playboy squadron and why it was created. That's why so many fled to Canada, they weren't "fortunate sons".

I sure see the irony of the situation, even if you don't or won't.
 

1EZduzit

Lifer
Feb 4, 2002
11,833
1
0
Originally posted by: Ozoned
Oh yea, That reminds me, Tom Daschle is gone , too.:thumbsup:

I was at Rapid City recently for my Aunt's 80th birthdayand you should have heard my Aunt and her daughter telling everyone how the closing of Ellsworth won't really have much of an effect on the economy out there.

They, well as far as that goes everybody in my family except me, are staunch Republicans. They both worked hard for Thunes campaign out in that area. As a matter of fact, Thune offered my cousin a job on his staff in D.C. Now their doing damage control for him, LOL.

Taunt me about Daschle all you like. I never liked him, but I think SD was stupid not to re-elect him because of his senority and the committes he was on. I least I'm not apologizing for Thune/Bush.
 

Glpster

Banned
Jan 14, 2005
221
0
0
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Originally posted by: AnyMal
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Originally posted by: AnyMal
Originally posted by: BBond
NCLB isn't about higher standards. It's about teachers pounding answers to test questions into childrens' heads because funding depends on it. No learning going on. Just instruction by rote.

And this from a lifetime screw-up. How ironic Bush would be the one to demand testing others for complying with standards he ignored.

I fail to see the irony. But do humor us.

It's kind of like sending people to war when he was having his Daddy pull politcal strings so he wouldn't have to go to Vietnam when it was his time to serve.

It kind of like getting into an ivy league school, not based on his preformance, but his heritage.

I could go on, but if you don't see the irony, well then that's just ironic, isn't it.

Oh come frigging on! How many times we need to rehash something that has been scrutinized and repeated thousands of times.

How many pilots from Bush's unit were deployed to Vietnam? Do you know of any? If GWB was so affraid of war why did he join in the first place? Why did he choose to be a fighter pilot, one of the most dangerous occupations in the military? Wouldn't it make more sense to be on some desk detail? If his daddy was so powerful and he wanted to get him out of war, couldn't he get him out of serving alltogether? Couldn't he, like some others*cough*Clinton*cough*, just dodge it all together, escape to Canada, or go to anti-American rallies in Moscow (or wherever he went)?

Until the truth come out, and it will eventually. Everyone knows about the playboy squadron and why it was created. That's why so many fled to Canada, they weren't "fortunate sons".

I sure see the irony of the situation, even if you don't or won't.


Ho!! Exactly.

And who WOULDN'T want to fly fighter jets (especially knowing that you wouldn't ever have to see real combat, as Bush knew, and explicity stated that he didn't want to be deployed over seas when he signed up).

Bush scored the lowest he possibly could to even qualify to fly. And I wouldn't be at all surprised if he scored lower and was bumped up to qualify. He's clearly NOT the sharpest tool in the shed.

Bush is the most heinous and reprehensible lying scum that has ever disgraced the White House. He WILL go down in history as one of the worst presidents ever, and MAY (and certainly should) go down in history as the FIRST president ever to be sent to prison.

 

Cerb

Elite Member
Aug 26, 2000
17,484
33
86
Originally posted by: Riprorin
He successfully executed two wars in the aftermath of 9/11/01: Afghanistan and Iraq. 50 million people who had lived under tyrannical regimes now live in freedom.
With birth defects and lukemia(sp) on the rise, and with thousands dead. Yay.

Signed the No Child Left Behind Act, delivering the most dramatic education reforms in a generation (challenging the soft bigotry of low expectations). The very liberal California Teachers union is currently running radio ads against the accountability provisions of this Act.
This is one of the worst acts ever to come down the pipe since the national DoE was created. It is made for recruiters and number-crunchers. Standardized tests are emphasized, making conplying with it a nightmare to creative kids. Rather than apply BS like the NCLB act, Congress should have taken money from the useless war, and put it towards art and music in primary schools. But hey, that would require money, time, and people to do it.

He continues to execute the War On Terror, getting worldwide cooperation to track funds/terrorists. Has cut off much of the terrorists' funding, and captured or killed many key leaders of the al Qaeda network.
Yes, because we are currently occupying Saudi Arabia, where the terrorists that made it came from...right?

He ordered Attorney General Ashcroft to formally notify the Supreme Court that the OFFICIAL U.S. government position on the 2nd Amendment is that it supports INDIVIDUAL rights to own firearms, and is NOT a Leftist-imagined "collective" right.
OK, except that that doesn't really matter. The USSC has more power, really :). Not that I disagree, but that action really mans nothing outside of the PR machine.
 
Feb 16, 2005
14,080
5,452
136
He's divided the country very deeply, nearly as deeply divided as it was during the civil war. The mentality of you're either with us or you're against us has hurt this nation. We are more polarized, the deep gap between rich and poor is hurting the working class, middle class and working poor. I hope this smacktard of a president does get impeached, does actually have to be held accountable for the lies that led up to the war in Iraq. Too many died for his lies.
 

irwincur

Golden Member
Jul 8, 2002
1,899
0
0
He's divided the country very deeply, nearly as deeply divided as it was during the civil war.

Now that is just an insane statement.


The media has divided the country. However, the division is no more than it ever has. I remember during the days of Reagan than the lefties and loonies used to rehash these same arguments.

Trust me, this cycle just repeats over and over and over. Whatever side is not in power will always be pissed about it. However, whenever a Republican is in power, the noise is amplified because the media also joins in on the bashing making morons in the left actually think that they are more than 12% of the population.

You are not. The left is the most endangered animal in the political spectrum. Ranting and raving like this does nothing for your future.
 

Darkhawk28

Diamond Member
Dec 22, 2000
6,759
0
0
Originally posted by: irwincur
He's divided the country very deeply, nearly as deeply divided as it was during the civil war.

Now that is just an insane statement.


The media has divided the country. However, the division is no more than it ever has. I remember during the days of Reagan than the lefties and loonies used to rehash these same arguments.

Trust me, this cycle just repeats over and over and over. Whatever side is not in power will always be pissed about it. However, whenever a Republican is in power, the noise is amplified because the media also joins in on the bashing making morons in the left actually think that they are more than 12% of the population.

You are not. The left is the most endangered animal in the political spectrum. Ranting and raving like this does nothing for your future.

You drank a lot of koolaid in your nine years of existence, haven't you?

Liberal media. :roll:
 

Proletariat

Diamond Member
Dec 9, 2004
5,614
0
0
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Here's yet another:

Signed the No Child Left Behind Act, delivering the most dramatic education reforms in a generation (challenging the soft bigotry of low expectations). The very liberal California Teachers union is currently running radio ads against the accountability provisions of this Act.
Maybe he should be worrying about accountability in relation to his foreign policy and the image of the United States of America abroad instead of the 'very liberal teachers union' in his own country.
 

AnyMal

Lifer
Nov 21, 2001
15,780
0
76
Originally posted by: Glpster
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Originally posted by: AnyMal
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Originally posted by: AnyMal
Originally posted by: BBond
NCLB isn't about higher standards. It's about teachers pounding answers to test questions into childrens' heads because funding depends on it. No learning going on. Just instruction by rote.

And this from a lifetime screw-up. How ironic Bush would be the one to demand testing others for complying with standards he ignored.

I fail to see the irony. But do humor us.

It's kind of like sending people to war when he was having his Daddy pull politcal strings so he wouldn't have to go to Vietnam when it was his time to serve.

It kind of like getting into an ivy league school, not based on his preformance, but his heritage.

I could go on, but if you don't see the irony, well then that's just ironic, isn't it.

Oh come frigging on! How many times we need to rehash something that has been scrutinized and repeated thousands of times.

How many pilots from Bush's unit were deployed to Vietnam? Do you know of any? If GWB was so affraid of war why did he join in the first place? Why did he choose to be a fighter pilot, one of the most dangerous occupations in the military? Wouldn't it make more sense to be on some desk detail? If his daddy was so powerful and he wanted to get him out of war, couldn't he get him out of serving alltogether? Couldn't he, like some others*cough*Clinton*cough*, just dodge it all together, escape to Canada, or go to anti-American rallies in Moscow (or wherever he went)?

Until the truth come out, and it will eventually. Everyone knows about the playboy squadron and why it was created. That's why so many fled to Canada, they weren't "fortunate sons".

I sure see the irony of the situation, even if you don't or won't.


Ho!! Exactly.

And who WOULDN'T want to fly fighter jets (especially knowing that you wouldn't ever have to see real combat, as Bush knew, and explicity stated that he didn't want to be deployed over seas when he signed up).

Bush scored the lowest he possibly could to even qualify to fly. And I wouldn't be at all surprised if he scored lower and was bumped up to qualify. He's clearly NOT the sharpest tool in the shed.

Bush is the most heinous and reprehensible lying scum that has ever disgraced the White House. He WILL go down in history as one of the worst presidents ever, and MAY (and certainly should) go down in history as the FIRST president ever to be sent to prison.

My question still stands. Why Bush served in the first place? I am sure it wouldn't be too hard for daddy to pull strings and get him out. Who from his unit was deployed to Vietnam?

Nobody gives a crap what his score was, he qualified and it's all that matters. Something, I seriously doubt you could have done yourself.
 

piasabird

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
17,168
60
91
He made a bunch of lefies cry their hearts out for terrorists that want nothing more than to kill everyone in America. He also let people see that we were more than willing to come and blow them up. Carter let terrorists do whatever they want and they kept doing it because their people were not dying. If you attack the USA you just might be bombed into oblivion. I personally think Bush was too nice to these terrorists, and thugs. He made the war too easy on the people. We should have carpet bombed bagdad till there was not one birck left standing.
 

ExpertNovice

Senior member
Mar 4, 2005
939
0
0
Originally posted by: shiraPlease, please, name SOMETHING we can all agree Bush has done well.

You and I obviously can't.

We would both say the budget the democrats wrote and Bush approved is much too high.

I would say the 50% increase in the education spending and over 40% increase for HRS (medicare, welfare, education, etc.) is too much you would say it is not enough. Even though you just agreed it was too much.

You would still raise taxes on everyone to increase spending then bemoan the fact that it was not enough and too much at the same time.

Thus, since NOTHING any conservative does you would agree with even though you hold the same ideals, you and I can never agree.

Luckily, since the first year of President Clinton's term of office more Democrats disagree with your opinions and have helped eliminate 60 years of control in the House and Senate and given control to the Republicans.

Of course, due to walk outs, filibusters, etc. and worse.... Bush not vetoing anything... the Democrats are still pretty much in control.


BTW, 9-11 was the direct result of Clinton not acting and Bush not having anything in his term to act upon. Bush could not just go after the terrorists because people such as yourself opposed such actions before 9-11 and even after. Even Clinton confesses that the reason he didn't take Osama bin Laden into custody was that he did not have the support of his constituents.

 

imported_Tango

Golden Member
Mar 8, 2005
1,623
0
0
Only good thing was Afganistan. It was already in a civil war state, and basically the US helped the northers coalition win the war.
Saddam no more there also is good, but not when you consider the way it was removed. If they really wanted Saddam out of business, a special operation to remove him would have been sufficient. Of course the Iraqi war made for geopolitical reasons, not to remove a dictator. Also the way the war was conducted was very poor, and the scandals of Abu-Ghraib, Falluja etc etc will damage the US image in the long term.
 

2cpuminimum

Senior member
Jun 1, 2005
578
0
0
Top ten good things from the neo-Bush Empire:
1. Has raised awareness through incompetence of the fact that us federal elections are fixed and the votes aren't counted.
2. Because he hasn't raised corporate average fuel economy standards, I'm going to make a fortune in renewable energy stocks when the gas prices
really start to ramp up.
3. One really good thing he's been doing is filling the national oil reserve. Since oil prices are going to spike higher every winter, this is just good planning.
Seriously if the feds invest enough in oil reserves and convert all government vehicles to run from ethanol, this could totally end up paying off the debt.
4. The military is working on photovolataic tents. Not really because of bush but at least it's something good he hasn't stopped the government from doing.
5. By attacking a country that was no danger to us in any way and had not threatened the US, he has alerted the rest of the world to the danger of the US Empire.
6. He has thus far been successful in repelling the extraterrestrial invasion. That assumes that such an invasion is taking place, but can you think of any other
explanation as to why we spend more money on the military than the rest of the world combined? Therefore good job sticking it to ET, Dubya.
7. He has made the book 1984 meaningful to the modern world again, and more realistic than ever before.
8. He hasn't entirely eliminated food stamps.
9. Getting rid of the Taliban would have been good, except who is running afghanistan now? Too bad it was all a ploy for corporate profit rather
than an actual interest in human rights or relief of suffering.
10. It was really mature of him to apologize to Iraq for invading, and pay restitution to all the families who have sufferred loss from the war.
It takes a real man/woman to admit to a big mistake that got lots of people killed. Did you all catch that on CNN?

As for NCLB, it doesn't introduce standards so much as it takes funding away from education and gives it to standardized testing programs. No positive side at all.
If you think NCLB introduces accountability, think again. No NCLB tests have in any way been correllated with future career success.

 

ExpertNovice

Senior member
Mar 4, 2005
939
0
0
Originally posted by: Sheik Yerbouti
He's divided the country very deeply, nearly as deeply divided as it was during the civil war. The mentality of you're either with us or you're against us has hurt this nation. We are more polarized, the deep gap between rich and poor is hurting the working class, middle class and working poor. I hope this smacktard of a president does get impeached, does actually have to be held accountable for the lies that led up to the war in Iraq. Too many died for his lies.


The President doesn't control the media. The media controls those that listen religously to it. If you don't want to feel divided stop listening to them.

The only division I see is from a few radicals. Some, however, are very powerful. George Soros has destroyed nations and tried to bring down the U.S. in 2004.
 

Philippine Mango

Diamond Member
Oct 29, 2004
5,594
0
0
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Processing.......Processing.......Processing.......Processing.......Processing.......Processing.......Processing.......Processing.......Processing.......Processing.......Processing.......Processing.

I guess he got rid of Saddam, even if it wasn't worth the cost and created an even worse mess, I guess that could be considered a good thing.

:thumbsup: