What happens to USC's 3 Peat now?

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: Dedpuhl

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: Svnla

Originally posted by: Dedpuhl

Originally posted by: NeoV
ok, a few things......

#1 - folks, get your heads out of your asses - USC won the National Champtionship 2 years in a row..BCS/AP, it doesn't fricken matter. There were co-national champions that year, get over it and move on...it's like 2nd graders fighting on a playground.

The teams agreed to the terms of the BCS. When things didn't go their way, USC decided to call themselves the Co-champs.

Yup, like I said in my previous post in this thread, BCS = TRUE NCAA FOOTBALL CHAMP. I have nothing against USC but all the peat this peat that is getting old. Fact is, USC won once, NOT twice, LSU won that year <2003>.

Even withb that poibnt of view it still says a lot about USC's progran that they were the best over the last three years, runner up twice and Champions once. I still think USC would have beaten the snot out of LSU if they had played them for the Championship.

I'm not doubting how great the team was; however, I think LSU's defense would've shut down USC. It would've been a classic battle.

Hmm I don't believe so as the only two losses they had in those 3 years were against high powered offensive teams like the 04 Bears and the 06 Longhorns.

 

[Rayden]

Originally posted by: CVSiN

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: CPA

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
That'd be a shame since they were the best team and program by far over the last 3 years.

Two out of 3 years.

Over the 3 years they did.

Oh please.. Texas was just as good as a team as them for the past 2 years.. USC has such an easy schedule year in and year out.. the Entire pac10 is a joke to football.

Actually, I believe the strength of schedule for USC last year was one of the toughest in the nation. They played more ranked teams than any other ranked team.

 

[GeneValgene]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: fisher

you aren't the best if you come in second. i know this is hard to understand, but try for our sake. you are starting to sound like an nvidia fanboy. "i make my own reality!"

.

I said the best overall for the last three years combined.

if you phrase it like this, then i would have to agree with you

 

[kalster]

keep commenting on usc as much as you want , lsu, texas, will never even have a chance to compete, be co-champions or even be in NC game for 3 consecutive years for a long time (if ever)

<-- waits for weak conference comments