what game has the best real looking graphics?

benjamit

Senior member
Dec 22, 2000
775
0
0
im playing call of duty now and im wondering if there is something thats better

note i am not a gamer

also what would you say is the minimun hardware needed to play this 'best' game?
 

Xionide

Diamond Member
Apr 20, 2002
8,679
2
81
Well I would say the game with the most craptacular graphics would be doom 3. Now before people sh!te themselves and bludgen me to death with a rock with a hand painted hl2 logo on it let me explain. Doom 3=scary as sh!t indoor better graphics, Hl2 outdoor great gameplay. And if you want to give me any sh!t about this you can go play in traffic. I have played both.
 

Czar

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
28,510
0
0
Originally posted by: Xionide
Well I would say the game with the most craptacular graphics would be doom 3. Now before people sh!te themselves and bludgen me to death with a rock with a hand painted hl2 logo on it let me explain. Doom 3=scary as sh!t indoor better graphics, Hl2 outdoor great gameplay. And if you want to give me any sh!t about this you can go play in traffic. I have played both.

you mean the very very slow alpha version of doom3 and the near textureless pre alpha version of halflife2?
 

Xionide

Diamond Member
Apr 20, 2002
8,679
2
81
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: Xionide
Well I would say the game with the most craptacular graphics would be doom 3. Now before people sh!te themselves and bludgen me to death with a rock with a hand painted hl2 logo on it let me explain. Doom 3=scary as sh!t indoor better graphics, Hl2 outdoor great gameplay. And if you want to give me any sh!t about this you can go play in traffic. I have played both.

you mean the very very slow alpha version of doom3 and the near textureless pre alpha version of halflife2?

Um d3 ran perfectly smooth for me so I dont know what you are talking about slow. And some of the levels were almost completely textured such as bugbait (which is what I compared it to) so stfu.
 

zimu

Diamond Member
Jun 15, 2001
6,209
0
0
Originally posted by: Xionide
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: Xionide
Well I would say the game with the most craptacular graphics would be doom 3. Now before people sh!te themselves and bludgen me to death with a rock with a hand painted hl2 logo on it let me explain. Doom 3=scary as sh!t indoor better graphics, Hl2 outdoor great gameplay. And if you want to give me any sh!t about this you can go play in traffic. I have played both.

you mean the very very slow alpha version of doom3 and the near textureless pre alpha version of halflife2?

Um d3 ran perfectly smooth for me so I dont know what you are talking about slow. And some of the levels were almost completely textured such as bugbait (which is what I compared it to) so stfu.

hey leave the guy alone.
at least until he upgrades his Pentium 100MHz.
 

Amorphus

Diamond Member
Mar 31, 2003
5,561
1
0
Originally posted by: Xionide
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: Xionide
Well I would say the game with the most craptacular graphics would be doom 3. Now before people sh!te themselves and bludgen me to death with a rock with a hand painted hl2 logo on it let me explain. Doom 3=scary as sh!t indoor better graphics, Hl2 outdoor great gameplay. And if you want to give me any sh!t about this you can go play in traffic. I have played both.

you mean the very very slow alpha version of doom3 and the near textureless pre alpha version of halflife2?

Um d3 ran perfectly smooth for me so I dont know what you are talking about slow. And some of the levels were almost completely textured such as bugbait (which is what I compared it to) so stfu.

so your comparing two incomplete products, and then declaring yourself an authority on it? of course, when people challenge you, you reply with your weak defense and a "stfu n00b my postcount>yours"?

rolleye.gif


Hey, guess what? I have an egg from a chicken here, and an egg from a swan in this other bowl. The two are pretty much the same, so I guess there's no point in choosing one over the other, eh?
 

Amorphus

Diamond Member
Mar 31, 2003
5,561
1
0
Originally posted by: TommyVercetti
The RPG called Life. Such real graphics!

The bump mapping is incredible! Motion blur, anti-aliasing, and anisotropic filtering up to the eyeballs, and not a smat of clipping! :Q
 

datalink7

Lifer
Jan 23, 2001
16,765
6
81
Originally posted by: Amorphus
Originally posted by: TommyVercetti
The RPG called Life. Such real graphics!

The bump mapping is incredible! Motion blur, anti-aliasing, and anisotropic filtering up to the eyeballs, and not a smat of clipping! :Q

My life has lag :(
 

SSibalNom

Golden Member
Aug 13, 2003
1,284
0
0
Originally posted by: Xionide
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: Xionide
Well I would say the game with the most craptacular graphics would be doom 3. Now before people sh!te themselves and bludgen me to death with a rock with a hand painted hl2 logo on it let me explain. Doom 3=scary as sh!t indoor better graphics, Hl2 outdoor great gameplay. And if you want to give me any sh!t about this you can go play in traffic. I have played both.

you mean the very very slow alpha version of doom3 and the near textureless pre alpha version of halflife2?

Um d3 ran perfectly smooth for me so I dont know what you are talking about slow. And some of the levels were almost completely textured such as bugbait (which is what I compared it to) so stfu.

did it run fine on that barton/5900nu system in ur "my rigs"?
 

Sid59

Lifer
Sep 2, 2002
11,879
3
81
Pac Man 2004 .. the pixel shaders and turned up AA / AF look awesome. only a high end card can appreciate the 80's flat look of the game.
 

Czar

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
28,510
0
0
Originally posted by: Xionide
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: Xionide
Well I would say the game with the most craptacular graphics would be doom 3. Now before people sh!te themselves and bludgen me to death with a rock with a hand painted hl2 logo on it let me explain. Doom 3=scary as sh!t indoor better graphics, Hl2 outdoor great gameplay. And if you want to give me any sh!t about this you can go play in traffic. I have played both.

you mean the very very slow alpha version of doom3 and the near textureless pre alpha version of halflife2?

Um d3 ran perfectly smooth for me so I dont know what you are talking about slow. And some of the levels were almost completely textured such as bugbait (which is what I compared it to) so stfu.
ah so a radeon 9700 pro pushing about 20-30fps at the lowest res is smooth?
everyone and their mother was talking about how slow it was, even the carmack himself, he said speed would be doubled at least in the final version which made everyone happy

and about half life, uuh almost completely textured, one level, and you are judging the whole game on that, also note, "pre alpha", alpha version is usualy the first realy running version of the engine that is used for testers to test platforms and so on, like take for example the stalker alpha (which looks awsome btw) you can judge what the game might look like from that. A developers pre alpha version on the other hand is far from that stage since the developer is still making the engine.

And please try to stay on topic, talking about games which are many months away is pointless, unless all you want to do is brag about knowing how to use kaaza or other file sharing programs, congrats, you do know how to.

 

Xionide

Diamond Member
Apr 20, 2002
8,679
2
81
Originally posted by: Amorphus
Originally posted by: Xionide
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: Xionide
Well I would say the game with the most craptacular graphics would be doom 3. Now before people sh!te themselves and bludgen me to death with a rock with a hand painted hl2 logo on it let me explain. Doom 3=scary as sh!t indoor better graphics, Hl2 outdoor great gameplay. And if you want to give me any sh!t about this you can go play in traffic. I have played both.

you mean the very very slow alpha version of doom3 and the near textureless pre alpha version of halflife2?

Um d3 ran perfectly smooth for me so I dont know what you are talking about slow. And some of the levels were almost completely textured such as bugbait (which is what I compared it to) so stfu.

so your comparing two incomplete products, and then declaring yourself an authority on it? of course, when people challenge you, you reply with your weak defense and a "stfu n00b my postcount>yours"?

rolleye.gif


Hey, guess what? I have an egg from a chicken here, and an egg from a swan in this other bowl. The two are pretty much the same, so I guess there's no point in choosing one over the other, eh?

They are two different type of games. One is enclosed the other isnt. It would make sense that an indoor game would have better graphics wouldnt it? I am not saying that hl2 isnt downright fvcking amazing. But everybody needs to look at it for what it is. Graphics dont make a game neither does gameplay, its the balance of both that is key. You damn fanboys are just hell bent that this is THE game, and that nothing else will touch it. And when someone says different you freak the fvck out. So stfu noob
 

Xionide

Diamond Member
Apr 20, 2002
8,679
2
81
Originally posted by: SSibalNom
Originally posted by: Xionide
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: Xionide
Well I would say the game with the most craptacular graphics would be doom 3. Now before people sh!te themselves and bludgen me to death with a rock with a hand painted hl2 logo on it let me explain. Doom 3=scary as sh!t indoor better graphics, Hl2 outdoor great gameplay. And if you want to give me any sh!t about this you can go play in traffic. I have played both.

you mean the very very slow alpha version of doom3 and the near textureless pre alpha version of halflife2?

Um d3 ran perfectly smooth for me so I dont know what you are talking about slow. And some of the levels were almost completely textured such as bugbait (which is what I compared it to) so stfu.

did it run fine on that barton/5900nu system in ur "my rigs"?

Ya both did
 

Xionide

Diamond Member
Apr 20, 2002
8,679
2
81
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: Xionide
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: Xionide
Well I would say the game with the most craptacular graphics would be doom 3. Now before people sh!te themselves and bludgen me to death with a rock with a hand painted hl2 logo on it let me explain. Doom 3=scary as sh!t indoor better graphics, Hl2 outdoor great gameplay. And if you want to give me any sh!t about this you can go play in traffic. I have played both.

you mean the very very slow alpha version of doom3 and the near textureless pre alpha version of halflife2?

Um d3 ran perfectly smooth for me so I dont know what you are talking about slow. And some of the levels were almost completely textured such as bugbait (which is what I compared it to) so stfu.
ah so a radeon 9700 pro pushing about 20-30fps at the lowest res is smooth?
everyone and their mother was talking about how slow it was, even the carmack himself, he said speed would be doubled at least in the final version which made everyone happy

and about half life, uuh almost completely textured, one level, and you are judging the whole game on that, also note, "pre alpha", alpha version is usualy the first realy running version of the engine that is used for testers to test platforms and so on, like take for example the stalker alpha (which looks awsome btw) you can judge what the game might look like from that. A developers pre alpha version on the other hand is far from that stage since the developer is still making the engine.

And please try to stay on topic, talking about games which are many months away is pointless, unless all you want to do is brag about knowing how to use kaaza or other file sharing programs, congrats, you do know how to.

I really dont care wtf carmack said cause i saw it run better than that on my system. Yes there are laggy spots but it was not 20-30fps at the lowest res. I bumped it up to 1024 and was getting around 60 fps (with all the lighting on too) for the most part.