what game has the best real looking graphics?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

BaboonGuy

Diamond Member
Aug 24, 2002
4,125
0
0
Originally posted by: Amorphus
Originally posted by: TommyVercetti
The RPG called Life. Such real graphics!

The bump mapping is incredible! Motion blur, anti-aliasing, and anisotropic filtering up to the eyeballs, and not a smat of clipping! :Q

anyone got any cheat codes/hacks (wallhack would be very nice :)) for this?
 

theNEOone

Diamond Member
Apr 22, 2001
5,745
4
81
Originally posted by: Xionide
Originally posted by: Amorphus
Originally posted by: Xionide
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: Xionide
Well I would say the game with the most craptacular graphics would be doom 3. Now before people sh!te themselves and bludgen me to death with a rock with a hand painted hl2 logo on it let me explain. Doom 3=scary as sh!t indoor better graphics, Hl2 outdoor great gameplay. And if you want to give me any sh!t about this you can go play in traffic. I have played both.

you mean the very very slow alpha version of doom3 and the near textureless pre alpha version of halflife2?

Um d3 ran perfectly smooth for me so I dont know what you are talking about slow. And some of the levels were almost completely textured such as bugbait (which is what I compared it to) so stfu.

so your comparing two incomplete products, and then declaring yourself an authority on it? of course, when people challenge you, you reply with your weak defense and a "stfu n00b my postcount>yours"?

rolleye.gif


Hey, guess what? I have an egg from a chicken here, and an egg from a swan in this other bowl. The two are pretty much the same, so I guess there's no point in choosing one over the other, eh?

They are two different type of games. One is enclosed the other isnt. It would make sense that an indoor game would have better graphics wouldnt it? I am not saying that hl2 isnt downright fvcking amazing. But everybody needs to look at it for what it is. Graphics dont make a game neither does gameplay, its the balance of both that is key. You damn fanboys are just hell bent that this is THE game, and that nothing else will touch it. And when someone says different you freak the fvck out. So stfu noob
i don't know if you're trying to be offensively defensive, defensively prepared, or just a fvcking idiot, but take a look at the sequence of posts you've quoted, take a second look at the topic, and then do yourself a favor and stick your fingers in a woodcutter.


=|
 

manly

Lifer
Jan 25, 2000
13,328
4,100
136
Originally posted by: Xionide

I really dont care wtf carmack said cause i saw it run better than that on my system. Yes there are laggy spots but it was not 20-30fps at the lowest res. I bumped it up to 1024 and was getting around 60 fps (with all the lighting on too) for the most part.
ROFL.
 

SneakyStuff

Diamond Member
Jan 13, 2004
4,294
0
76
Commander Keen, It blows HL2 and Doom3 out of the water, I mean WOW! It's so intense! ;)

Now in actuality, I would have to say that a pretty realistic game would be Splinter Cell, but honestly, you can't get very "REAL" in terms of the pc games out now, 5 years from now, ill bet you will be able to look at a PC game and be like wow! is this real or what!?
 

SneakyStuff

Diamond Member
Jan 13, 2004
4,294
0
76
Oh yea, in terms of "minimun requirements" for Splinter Cell, I would reccomend a 1.2-1.4 Ghz or higher CPU, 512 Mb ram, and a 64 MB Radeon or Geforce TI or FX series Video card. You could play the game with much less than that, but that would make it look very cheap, not very real ;)