-
We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.
what forum topics annoy you the most?
- Thread starter brainhulk
- Start date
Ruptga
Lifer
Yeah those guys are the worst, but I'm glad we don't have anyone like that here.
MongGrel
Lifer
Does provide a bit of an entertainment factor.
Ruptga
Lifer
Sometimes, sure, but trolling is a art. Flooding the internet with retarded crap isn't trolling, it's just banging on a keyboard.
shortylickens
No Lifer
People whining about the forums.
toughtrasher
Senior member
People whining about "reputation" or "likes" on their posts (relative to the forums that support it)
lightpants
Platinum Member
tipping
IronWing
No Lifer
How much should I tip the nurse at the abortion clinic?
SlickSnake
Diamond Member
Most sports topics bore the living crap out of me. Unless I'm playing the sport or betting on it, I just don't care enough about it to obsess over sports and who's playing it.
And that disdain includes all the misguided colleges who have mostly lost their primary focus on higher education and instead chose to fund full tuitions for below average students who are considered star athletes just to fill a college stadiums otherwise empty seats just to hopefully win games and thus attempt to justify the ridiculousness of it all.
Sports jocks need to go to a sports specific technical school and all the much vaunted collegiate institutes of higher learning should stop pretending jocks are there to learn anything really useful besides hitting or throwing a stupid ball around just for shits and giggles and an excuse for the college frats to throw a party after they win a game.
And that disdain includes all the misguided colleges who have mostly lost their primary focus on higher education and instead chose to fund full tuitions for below average students who are considered star athletes just to fill a college stadiums otherwise empty seats just to hopefully win games and thus attempt to justify the ridiculousness of it all.
Sports jocks need to go to a sports specific technical school and all the much vaunted collegiate institutes of higher learning should stop pretending jocks are there to learn anything really useful besides hitting or throwing a stupid ball around just for shits and giggles and an excuse for the college frats to throw a party after they win a game.
Mayne
Diamond Member
Political debates that go nowhere.
In my mind when we're talking politics we're really talking philosophy. When we discuss taxes we're really talking about individuals and the idea of a meritocracy and intersubjectivity. One side will say you are born an individual, come into the world the same as everyone else, and your income is equal to the amount of work you've put in. The other recognizes the individual but as a historical entity born into the world and produced by the world. You are not born equal and hard word doesn't necessarily translate to wealth. Taxes work to combat this structural inequality inherent in a capitalistic society. But no one speaks in these terms, they focus on the empirical level. For example, Obama may say10% of families are living in poverty in the USA as an argument for us needing this or that policy, but if we don't recognize the underlying philosophy each side will simply assimilate that fact into their own theoretical view. One side will say that 10% of people made bad choices and don't work hard enough, the other will say that 10% are victims of an unequal system. The underlying philosophy is what allows us to make sense of the empirical world, but it is ignored.
Political debates always eschew these difficult, fundamental ideas that inform a party's ideology in favour of rhetoric and playing the political game. It is easier to convince people they're being convinced than to ask difficult questions, ask the voters to learn as a part of their civic duty, and actually convince them. So long as we ignore the theoretical underpinnings of our own thinking we cannot have a conversation with anyone else.
I don't think it's too much to ask people to learn (not in the sense of accumulating facts but of being critical and cognizant of the philosophy that informs mine and other's worldview) in order to properly participate in politics.
In my mind when we're talking politics we're really talking philosophy. When we discuss taxes we're really talking about individuals and the idea of a meritocracy and intersubjectivity. One side will say you are born an individual, come into the world the same as everyone else, and your income is equal to the amount of work you've put in. The other recognizes the individual but as a historical entity born into the world and produced by the world. You are not born equal and hard word doesn't necessarily translate to wealth. Taxes work to combat this structural inequality inherent in a capitalistic society. But no one speaks in these terms, they focus on the empirical level. For example, Obama may say10% of families are living in poverty in the USA as an argument for us needing this or that policy, but if we don't recognize the underlying philosophy each side will simply assimilate that fact into their own theoretical view. One side will say that 10% of people made bad choices and don't work hard enough, the other will say that 10% are victims of an unequal system. The underlying philosophy is what allows us to make sense of the empirical world, but it is ignored.
Political debates always eschew these difficult, fundamental ideas that inform a party's ideology in favour of rhetoric and playing the political game. It is easier to convince people they're being convinced than to ask difficult questions, ask the voters to learn as a part of their civic duty, and actually convince them. So long as we ignore the theoretical underpinnings of our own thinking we cannot have a conversation with anyone else.
I don't think it's too much to ask people to learn (not in the sense of accumulating facts but of being critical and cognizant of the philosophy that informs mine and other's worldview) in order to properly participate in politics.
UglyCasanova
Lifer
Dmcowen replying to himself.
General nef threads
General nef threads
Orignal Earl
Diamond Member
I get annoyed that I let it annoy me
There is so much win in this.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 24K
-
-
