What do you think would happen if Al Qaeda detonated a nuclear weapon in a US city

Page 7 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

sao123

Lifer
May 27, 2002
12,653
205
106
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
well the sh*t would finally hit the fan for all those that go around chanting death to america. u know those people only do it because its pretty consequence free. welll supporting terror would finally hit them in the ass. a surrender or die ultimatim in the middle east would probably happen. failed civilization, they need to be ruled over or killed. they give up right to self rule until they demonstrate their society is free from the poison of that religion. that would be the "fair" response. the other one would involve perhaps a thousand icbms. with a worldwide reaction of "anger", but really silent relief they dont' have to deal with that region ever again.


Originally posted by: sao123
while you're all worried about thie big cities... some beloved patriot sits in a closet preparing to nuke the open country in the central us.
Forget killing people... well nuke the grain basket and starve them all to death.

No grain, no corn, no cows.
yea... worldwide screwedness.


think u overestimate the size of a nuke blast.



Right... like they'd only use one... just like they used how many planes?
It doesnt take much to contaminate a large amount of crops.
Immediate Fields...
Irrigation/Groundwater supplies...
Upper Atmosphere currents...

and i dont think wheat fields have security measures as good as most airports do.


Additionally... it would only have to affect the region for a 2-3 growing seasons to really cause a famine. I know fallout lasts at least that long.
 

JS80

Lifer
Oct 24, 2005
26,271
7
81
Originally posted by: virtualgames0
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: jjsole
Originally posted by: MetronMuslims have a 20 year plan to spread Islam across the globe... they don't mind at all if OBL helps that process along the way. Hitler had similar plans of world domination...

And Christians have plans to spread christianity around the world, in less than 20 years God willing, and don't mind if its aided by a massive hurricane or a continental tsunami. But great point...do you get your talking points from GW speeches?

I don't see Jerry Falwell telling his evangelists to murder someone if he refuses to convert to Christianity :confused:

meanwhile Islamic Imams are declaring convert or be killed...

You seem to turn a blind eye to the fact that christians has killed millions in the past for not converting.

No I don't. The Bible does not condone murdering non-converts. Tell me 1 part of what Jesus taught that says it's OK to kill. If anything He'd probably tell us to do nothing and get slaughtered. The Crusades was one big mistake by the Catholics. This is why I am against Catholicism - too much power to 1 man, and men make mistakes. What part of the Crusades can you tie to the New Testament?

The difference is that the Koran says it's OK to kill people who are not Muslim. Not even the old testament teaches this. This is one fundamental difference between Christianity and Islam. Live and let live vs convert or die.
 

Vich

Platinum Member
Apr 11, 2000
2,849
1
0
Originally posted by: Frackal
We should only destroy Mecca and Medina IMO if we intend and are prepared to eradicate all Muslims around the world, which is not what we wish or should do. And I sincerely hope it never comes to that.

Another holocaust is not what we want. It would have the opposite effect, especially on a religion like Islam. We just need to eradicate everyone but the U.S.A. So we are a nice island with no one to bother us!
 

flyboy84

Golden Member
Jul 21, 2004
1,731
0
76
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
The posts her are quite hilarious. All I see is a bunch of kids running a round being stupid.

if a nuke was detonated in the US I think that the majority of the knuckle draggering Bible thumpers would try to remove the term limit and vote their God given monarch into power again. I also think that, with Bush yet again in power, we'd end up over-reacting by pummeling Syria, Jordan, Iran, Iraq, and demanding Indonesia clean up their act, then we'd invade Venezuela and Cuba because they are now part of the Axis of Evil.

There'd be no world war, as the world would be so horrified that they might be next that most would get in line or shut up.

404 overreaction not found


:laugh:
 
Oct 4, 2004
10,515
6
81
Sorry for responding late. I fell asleep after my post (it was 2AM where I live)

I think there is one fatal flaw in your logic here...

Well, that's true for any religious debate:)

While Christians (and most sentient beings) almost universally denounce, decry, and despise the actions of Adolf Hitler, just the opposite seems to be true among Muslims with their praise for Osama bin Laden. Bin Laden is held in a position of reverence and respect by the majority of Muslims. Hitler is regarded by Christians as a genocidal maniac.

I absolutely agree with you here. I'm an Indian muslim and not once have I ever been a victim of any kind of hate crime or religious/racial prejudice. I'll graduate in 2007 with a Bachelor's degree in Software Engineering. I come from an upper-middle-class family where education is top priority. All muslims that I know personally (people like me) share my exact views. You know what we say, whenever the OBL/UBL discussion pops up - "Moron has it all wrong. If he had any brains, he would've bombed Israeli/US military bases. Asshole added about another million to the world's problems."

The people who dance in the streets are the ones who, in some way, were directly affected by the conflict in the Middle-East. They don't understand how the world works. Sure, they feel for their Ummah (community/brotherhood)...but their hatred for the West is so strong that they have chosen to forget about the peace.

I'll quote some passages from the Quran.

"So obey not the disbelievers, but make a great jihad (effort) against them (by preaching) with it (the Qur'an)" (Surah Al-Furqan 25:52)

"...If anyone killed a person not in retaliation for murder or to spread mischief in the land, it would be as if he killed the whole of mankind. And (likewise) if anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the whole of mankind" (Surah Al-Maaida 5:32)

"There is no compulsion in religion. The right path has indeed become distinct from the wrong. So whoever rejects false worship and believes in Allah, then he has grasped the most trustworthy handhold that will never break. And Allah is All Hearing, All Knowing" (Surah Al-Baqarah 2:256)

"Allah does not forbid you to deal justly and kindly with those who fought not against you on account of religion, nor drove you out of your homes. Indeed, Allah loves those who deal with equity" (Surah Al-Mumtahinah 60:8)

"And fight in the way of Allah those who fight you. But do not transgress the limits. Truly Allah loves not the transgressors" (Surah Al-Baqarah 2:190)

"For had it not been that Allah checks one set of people by means of another, monasteries, churches, synagogues and mosques, wherein the name of Allah is mentioned much, would surely have been pulled down. Indeed Allah will help those who help His (cause). Truly Allah is All strong, All mighty" (Surah Al-Hajj 22:40)


The following is a quote that is often misused to portray Islam as a religion of hatred.
"And what is the matter with you that you do not fight in the cause of Allah and for those weak, ill treated and oppressed among men, women and children whose only cry is; 'Our Lord, rescue us from this town whose people are oppressors and raise for us from you one who will protect and raise for us from you one who will help" (Surah An-Nisa 4:75)

I personally don't see what's wrong with it. It commands muslims to protect their own people from oppressors. That sounds fair, doesn't it?

This is what the Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) said about suicide: ""He who kills himself with anything, Allah will torment him with that in the fire of Hell"

So, suicide isn't justified with anything. Even a suicide bombing act. A warrior is one who walks into battle with the objective of destroying the enemy, and going back home (alive) to his family and nation. Suicide is out of the question. Suicide attacks are an act of cowardice, and Allah doesn't reward cowards.

I still maintain (sadly) that most muslims have forgotten (or chosen to forget) some of the most basic principles of Islam, because of the circumstances they live in. I have spent my whole life, learning about my religion from my parents and the Imam from my neighborhood madrasa. I always thought I belonged to a religion of great peace, love and great acts of forgiveness and bravery in the hardest of circumstances. I still believe that. It just bums me out that all believing muslims are so pre-occupied with dispelling myths and anti-muslim propaganda, that there is no time to actually be vocal about the merits of the religion.

To address some of the questions Frackal asked:
1) But what Bin Laden has called for is defensive Jihad. Is it not the duty of every Muslim to provide whatever support they are capable of if they determine that the conditions for a defensive Jihad are met? (ie, Muslim people, land, wealth, religion under assault)

Yes, Bin Laden has called for defensive Jihad. But Bin Laden lost all credibility when he chose to crash airliners with innocent people onboard into the WTC. Are the Palestinians being driven out of their homes? Yes. Are they being brutally massacred? Yes. Do they have the right to strike back at Israel? Yes. They have every right to strike back at the soldiers who are out to kill them. What is Jihad exactly? Literally, it means struggle. In the context of war, it means "A Struggle to uphold your right to practice your religion. It can be peaceful, in the case of a propaganda or Cold War...it can be violent in the case of full-blown war."

Blowing up buses and supermarkets in Israel is not Jihad. A full-on offensive against the Israeli Army that keeps enroaching into Palestinian lands would be Jihad. Killing civilians, women & children is a transgression against the Islamic Laws of War. Bin Laden knows this...if he knows anything about Islam, he knows this. But he chose a different, unislamic route to draw attention to his cause.

2)I do think it is acceptable for Muslims to live their own way in their own traditional lands. The sticky part comes from the mixing of our two cultures. When "we" are in "your" lands and vice versa.

You are right again. The only solution is for both parties to be sensitive towards one another. Figure out what is unacceptable to the other, and refrain from it. This is actually in effect in India - sure, there are a few communal riots every now and then, but nothing that has ever affected the stability of this entire country. A mosque was bombed just a week ago...a temple 2 weeks before that. A railway station not too long ago. But people have stopped feeling animosity towards one another. They understand who orchestrates these attacks...and their motives behind them.

The Quran does advocate no separation of State & Religion. If implemented well, it can actually be a good thing. A good example would be Saudi Arabia (one of the lowest crime rates worldwide)...an example gone horrid would be the Pakistan/Taliban/the Saddam Hussein government. Power corrupted all these dictators. The Quran advocates building a civil society based on it's teachings that serves as a benchmark for other nations to marvel at. Of course, nobody has come close to this in over a thousand years.

There needs to be a tremendous reform in the Islamic World because we have all, collectively, managed to convince the world we are crazy, murderous psychos who have no regard for fellow man. It's one thing to feel for your Ummah. To be moved by news reports of massive civilian casualties. It's absolutely right to demand justice. But the Quran does support terrorism. Maybe if all the war & destruction would cease, the leaders were rational men with socio-economic development as top priority, the schools weren't all piles of rubble and there wasn't a funeral in the neighborhood every other day, the people of my community would actually consider trying to live a normal 21st century life. And consider the true Islamic Way of Life.

Sorry if I didn't address some of the questions you asked. Ask me if I'm leaving something out.
 

newmachineoverlord

Senior member
Jan 22, 2006
484
0
0
That event would automatically trigger the Doomsday Device.

Unfortunately, the current administration which ordered its construction failed to grasp one significant aspect of the function of the doomsday device: The whole point of a Doomsday Machine is lost, if you keep it a secret!
 

Skyclad1uhm1

Lifer
Aug 10, 2001
11,383
87
91
More countries without WMDs would be invaded, and the US' friends like Pakistan, where most of the Al Qaida top is hiding, would be left alone yet again.
 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,808
83
91
if Al Qaeda detonated a nuclear weapon inside a US city... the government would make up some evidence linking Al Qaeda to (insert any oil-rich anti-US country) and we'd go to war with them.
 

mchammer

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2000
3,152
0
76
This is the whole point of the current war on terrorism. If a terrorist group gains the possesion of a nuke and is determined to use it there is nothing that can be done at that point. Prevention is the only solution. If a nuke was detonated that would mean our strategy had failed and we would need a strategy to prevent another attack, or accept defeat. At that point the only option would likely be the wholesale occupation of many areas of the world by coalition Western forces. Unlike this BS in Iraq right now, this would have to done with many millions of men. We would then have to protect the people there and make those areas nice enough that unbridled extremeism would not find a foothold there. We would have to erase the old borders and make new, more sensible borders in the Middle East to replace the mess that was made there after WWI. We would have to stay for long enough to see that these countries became mature and strong. It would be equivalent in scale to WWII but with less deaths if done right. It would require the cooperation of the entire Western world and the Eastern Europeans, and hopefully the Asians as well. The alternatives to this might include the slow but steady conquest of the West by those using terrorist tactics. They would either then rise to become a major world power or there would be infighting in their movement and the world would be devided into isolated constantly warring factions. If they did not eliminate themselves, world history would then repeat starting at about 2000 bc.

The only other alternative would be that we would have to change our lifestle to live in a way that could not be easily affected by unstable extremist groups with WMD. This would mean small and decentralized, largely self sufficient communities. A simpler lifestyle if you will.
 

LordMaul

Lifer
Nov 16, 2000
15,168
1
0

A small yield nuclear device is detonated in a the center of a major US city, not necessarily New York or DC. Knowing their thinking, they might want to target a place that's associated with our captialism, military, or that has "a lot of Jewish" people.


Well, if that's the case, I'm screwed. I work in Highland Park, Illinois... Jew Mecca of the Midwest. Not kidding, either...if you have a jewish friend, he probably has a lot of relatives that live here. :)
 

judasmachine

Diamond Member
Sep 15, 2002
8,515
3
81
we'd also find out that guys like chuck norris, and bruce willis are really just hollywood sissys.
 

g8wayrebel

Senior member
Nov 15, 2004
694
0
0
I have no idea what will happen ,but you can ammend the question to "what do you think will happen when they do?" With the disolution of the USSR ,there are plenty of Nuclear weapons. to be had It is only a matter of time before extremists manage to get one here and successfully detonate it.
 

SolMiester

Diamond Member
Dec 19, 2004
5,330
17
76
Segregation & deportment of all non amercian civilians........How many sleepers do you think live currently in the US
 

Brbnboy13

Junior Member
Aug 16, 2006
20
0
0
Thousands are currently living in the US!!! They might be your neighbor or your friend or your co-worker. They are not necessarily an Arab, they might be African or British or French. They could be anybody!!!!
 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
Originally posted by: SolMiester
Segregation & deportment of all non amercian civilians........How many sleepers do you think live currently in the US

I don't think the NBA, MLB or NFL would be too happy about that. Let alone the massive legal Latin American population in the US.
 

voodoodrul

Senior member
Jul 29, 2005
521
1
81
My personal opinion? This will happen. Only it won't happen because of terrorists. Our own government would conduct the entire operation, blame Al Qaeda, and use the event as extreme leverage to implement a massive police-state. They would use it as an example of what will happen if we don't listen to Bush and his rediculous, yet successful, efforts to abolish your rights. I am fully convinced his whole reason for existance is as a distraction.. A puppet used to show complete incompentence. We all sit around and blame Bush and his incompetence, while those really making all this happen go unnoticed. So the next president won't change things much, whoever that may be. The president is a figure head.. He is PR.. He only exists to distract you/misdirect you.

It's been a long time.. and the American public doesn't have a long attention span. Like an action movie needs to have an action scene every 5 minutes, so does the American public need a "reminder" of 9/11. It's been too long and people are losing/have lost patience with all the fearmongering. What better way to solidify the American public with support for a police-state and worldwide government rule than progressive attacks on your own people?

It has been done before.. many, many times in human history. It's happening now and nobody wants to accept/realize it.

Be prepared for the ideals that America stood for, at least on paper, to completely dissolve.

"They that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin

"The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists." J. Edgar Hoover

"If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy." -- James Madison
 

Finalnight

Golden Member
Mar 5, 2003
1,891
1
76
Originally posted by: LordMaul

A small yield nuclear device is detonated in a the center of a major US city, not necessarily New York or DC. Knowing their thinking, they might want to target a place that's associated with our captialism, military, or that has "a lot of Jewish" people.


Well, if that's the case, I'm screwed. I work in Highland Park, Illinois... Jew Mecca of the Midwest. Not kidding, either...if you have a jewish friend, he probably has a lot of relatives that live here. :)

I thought Skokie and Evanston was midwest jew capital. lol.

Seriously though, if we got hit by a nuke, it would be like OMGWTFBBQ Sh!t hitting fan in massive quantities pwnage4thewin. We would probably invade Iran and Syria simeaultaneously, though I don't think we would try to hit Mecca and Medina since the saudi's would probably then self destruct ALL of their oil infrastructure and so would the rest of Arab OPEC countries, not to mention the the fact that Pakistan would probably nuke India, Israel and maybe us.