- Oct 28, 1999
- 62,484
- 8,345
- 126
Anything with a drawl.
Right. That's why the midwest is known for having one of the most standard accent of any of the major regions of the US and it's the accent that many national newscasters try and learn.
Anything with a drawl.
Southern parts of NJ have a drawl as well.
I find people who never lived in the Mid West think of it as a geographical area as opposed to Mid Westerners who think of it as a socioeconomic grouping.
KS NE and the dakotas are not midwest. They are plains states, like oklahoma. Which is not southwestern like some say
All of those flat fly-over states in the middle of the country above Texas.
So then why would Iowa or Missouri be Midwest? I feel "Plains States" simply refers to the farmland moniker, and not so much the geographic region. Just as the "Mountain States" are part of the "West".
Examples of other regional monikers:
Fly-over States
Heartland
Bible Belt
Midwest is a location, not a description. Plains is a description, not a location. They are not mutually exclusive. You have the reasoning of a walrus.
Well thats just plain wrong.We are the midwest, east of colorado, west of the mississippi. Colorado and west is "west", middle of the country is midwest (middle country, + west of mississippi), and ohio and the surrounding states are the ohio river valley area. Then you have the south, southeast, and east, and northeast.
If the "Midwest" were really the middle west area of the USA, it'd be like Oregon/norcal/nevada.
Also, there isn't really a "south". If there were, it would have to include everything from AZ, NM, TX, OK, AR, TN, AL, LS, MI, GA, SC, and FL. Noone in their right mind would put arizona new mexico and texas in the same region as georgia and florida.
But Texas IS in the same region as Georgia and Florida...sort of. It's part of the Southern USA. It certainly isn't part of the Western states...Arizona and New Mexico are part of the desert Southwest...and parts of West Texas could be considered as part of that...but not the entire state. (so could part of SoCal.)
Couple that with the fact that KS fits very well with another regional moniker (plains states), and you'd have to be a moron to call kansas midwest
People seem to have different definitions of where the "midwest" is. Which of these states do you consider as midwestern?
Unless you consider the plains states to be a subset of a broader midwest category.
What's considered the "midwest" is in those maps, it's just horribly misnamed. If I decided such things nothing east of the Mississippi River could even be close to falling into the category. I would toss CO and WY into the definition too, because the Rocky Mountains seem to be a good natural dividing line between what should be West and Midwest. I also would hesitate to call anything bording canada midwest... midwest implies MIDDLE, not northern.
![]()
:hmm:
Jules,
I'm going to be in San Diego for about 30 minutes on April 10th and I'm gonna find you and hash this out
but only if I can find time between switching planes....