• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

What Do Dems Have Against Women?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Please explain how I am? But, if I am, maybe I am just taking my example on how to treat women from the Democrats?
You single out "the left" attacking Sarah Palin. You assume its because she's a woman.

I ask again, "Why do you treat Sarah Palin as less than a man?"

BTW.. I voted for Hillary in the primaries vs. Barack.. not many of you sexist pigs here can say that.
You admit to voting for Hillary because she's a woman...?

Why do you treat Hillary as less than a man?
 
You single out "the left" attacking Sarah Palin. You assume its because she's a woman...
FNE pretends not to understand that someone can oppose "Conservative" women such as Half-Governor Palin, Representative Bachmann, Candidate O'Donnell or Representative Angle on basis of competence, policy or sanity; in his world, any criticism of "Conservative" women can be rooted only in misogyny.

His denials of "Liberal" or "Progressive" support of the many powerful women in the Democratic Party with his "but Hillary..." deflections are merely evidence of his fundamental trollishness.
 
To play devil's advocate: What part of challenging a woman's competence involves the use of the word "Whore"?


(please note my earlier response/opinion that this kind of sh*t is normal for all parties and has little/nothing to do with mysogyny or racism or whatever... But rather whatever abuse you can heap on the other side being acceptable by way of 'ends justify the means' mindset common to all. )
 
To play devil's advocate: What part of challenging a woman's competence involves the use of the word "Whore"?


(please note my earlier response/opinion that this kind of sh*t is normal for all parties and has little/nothing to do with mysogyny or racism or whatever... But rather whatever abuse you can heap on the other side being acceptable by way of 'ends justify the means' mindset common to all. )

Does N.O.W. now stand for Nat'l organization for Whores? Cause they endorsed the gentleman that Called Meg a whore.

Any Chance the NOW has left any shadow of a doubt that it is a strictly partisan organization and couldn't give pink ribbon about women?
 
Does N.O.W. now stand for Nat'l organization for Whores? Cause they endorsed the gentleman that Called Meg a whore.

Any Chance the NOW has left any shadow of a doubt that it is a strictly partisan organization and couldn't give pink ribbon about women?

That gentlemen was also against mammograms. The Democrat party hasn't met a woman yet its not willing to exploit.
 
I "like" women politicians....especially the one from Alaska that winked at me on TV while this guy was mangling a turkey behind her. I knew she was sending me a message....about what, I have no idea. I guess that makes me a mysoginist?

I "like" women shills too. Especially the one that makes herself look like a hoochie mama with the long blonde hair but talks crazy trash worse than Rush Limbaugh. I guess that makes me a sexist mysoginist?

I "like" this ditzy, clueless TeaBagger woman who claims she's not a witch, she's ME. I guess that makes me a psuedo-lesbian sexist mysoginist?

I "like" this Asian female commentator who faithfully parrots neocon ideological talking points and doesn't have a single original thought in her head other than wether she should wipe her eyeballs with her tongue from the right or the left. I guess that makes me a herpetophobic bigoted psuedo-lesbian sexist mysoginist?

OK, I'm good with that.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top