What Do Dems Have Against Women?

[Lemon law]

Let me see if I can get my arms around this, one aid to Jerry Brown suggested calling Meg Whitman a whore, and suddenly ALL DEMOCRATS have it against ALL WOMEN.

This kind of bogus reasoning certainly exists in the minuscule mind of PJIBBERISH and Rush Limbaugh.

But applying a little actual logic can consume 99.44 % of its weight in excess bullshit reasoning.

 

[WHAMPOM]

I had a great time at the Gareth Emery show last evening. But if I thought my ears were ringing then I only had to check in on this morning's ATP&N Tea Party bashing!

Sipping my triple ristretto, I am highly amused at the little hatefest of the Tea Party going on today. The Dems, the progs and the pantyhose wearing libruls are in a real tizzy! Maybe they woke up, and found that they really, really, really aren't going to be getting the respect they thought they deserve after having their way with the country for the past four years?

Amidst the diatribes, I am flabbergasted at the liberal claim that these exploitative cads are somehow "for" women, minorities, the underdogs. That their policies and actions reek of condescension always escapes them.

More and more, however, the misogyny is coming out in the open, particularly as the Tea Party, the conservatives, the libertarians and the Republicans (no, they are not the same, not at all) are fielding lots and lots of women as candidates. Hear them roar!

See if you can find any substantive addressing of political platforms by the prog critics here and in the press.

Actually, don't bother. All you will find are insults about appearance (though aren't these conservative women quite attractive, physically as well as intellectually?) and a wholesale attempt to nitpick their "commonness."

I think the applicable term is "catty."

Brown's "Well, I am going to use that" sounds a bit sarcastic, I am really, really sure "Whore" would have been in next weeks political message. But Op, you may Blog away with straining at gnats and faux outrage to your heart's content.

 

[Moonbeam]

What do you expect from a Burcher.

 

[LegendKiller]

This is such a ridiculous post.

Out of 38 female Senators from 1922, 13/38 were republican.

There have been past VP candidates, including Ferraro, as well as influential ones such as Dole in more recent memory.


I guess the flip side of the equation is why do Republicans only seem to forward women of low intellectual capacity and questionable moral/social standards that are hypocrites in those categories?

 

[OrByte]

This is such a ridiculous post.

Out of 38 female Senators from 1922, 13/38 were republican.

There have been past VP candidates, including Ferraro, as well as influential ones such as Dole in more recent memory.


I guess the flip side of the equation is why do Republicans only seem to forward women of low intellectual capacity and questionable moral/social standards that aren't hypocrites in those categories?

"I'm NOT a witch"

 

[LegendKiller]

"I'm NOT a witch"

I, for the life of me, can't understand why any woman of any intellectual capacity would want Palin or O'Donnel representing them.

I mean, really, these are the best examples of women the Republicans can forward? This is really the best your party has?

Really?

I don't hate women of intelligence, my wife is very intelligent, as is her mother, my mother, my grandmothers...etc. However, I cannot stand stupid people.

It just so happens that that's the only class of people the Republicans can forward. The battle against intellectualism is rampant.

So the question that is really the most base and relevant question....


Why do Republicans have against smart people?

 

[Fear No Evil]

I just emailed Nancy Pelosi asking her if its true Dems hate women and won't let them get into positions of power.

I wanted to ask the most powerful elected woman in the Republican party the same question. I just don't know who that would be.

Really? Are you that stupid? The Democrats want Nancy Pelosi out of power so bad they elected an incompetent black guy just so he would be such a failure she would lose the next election. Do you need these things spelled out for you?

 

[LegendKiller]

Really? Are you that stupid? The Democrats want Nancy Pelosi out of power so bad they elected an incompetent black guy just so he would be such a failure she would lose the next election. Do you need these things spelled out for you?

How, exactly, is he incompetent? By what standard do you measure incompetency?

How about we measure it against every president in the last 30 years, benchmarking them and their major scandals and failures.

How well do you think the last 3 Republican presidents would fare against the last 2 democratic ones?

The only Republican I would place in the top 3 would be George HW Bush, he was a smart guy and did reasonably well. As far as the other 2, I would place them 4 (Reagan) and 5 (Bush) out of the top 5.

 

[Siddhartha]

Clearly the "Liberals" who seated 13 of the 17 women currently in the Senate; who seated 57 of the 74 women currently in the House of Representatives, including the first woman Speaker; who seated all three of the women currently on the Supreme Court; who very nearly nominated the first major party woman candidate for president then made her Secretary of State; clearly, these are the misogynists in the current political scene, placing these women in unprecedented positions of power only to conceal the depths of their misogyny.

Didn't the Democratic Party run a woman for Vice President back in 1984?

 

[Fear No Evil]

Didn't the Democratic Party run a woman for Vice President back in 1984?

LOL. Yeah how did that work out? Its almost like they purposely set the women's movement back like 20 years.

 

[DangerAardvark]

When you don't have anything intelligent to say about content, you argue about tone.

 

[werepossum]

Clearly the "Liberals" who seated 13 of the 17 women currently in the Senate; who seated 57 of the 74 women currently in the House of Representatives, including the first woman Speaker; who seated all three of the women currently on the Supreme Court; who very nearly nominated the first major party woman candidate for president then made her Secretary of State; clearly, these are the misogynists in the current political scene, placing these women in unprecedented positions of power only to conceal the depths of their misogyny.

Yes, the liberals LOVE them some women and blacks - as long as they stay in their place and do as they are told. Should women or blacks stray from the party line, then the libs get vicious.

 

[sportage]

I think the bigger question is what do closet republicans have against gays?
Now THAT's worth a little professional analysis time.

So as to Calif gov race... Arnold is out?
Gaud... get ready for more of those movies.

 

[werepossum]

I think the bigger question is what do closet republicans have against gays?
Now THAT's worth a little professional analysis time.

So as to Calif gov race... Arnold is out?
Gaud... get ready for more of those movies.

Well - it appears that first, at least in airport bathrooms, it is their feet . . .

 

[Fear No Evil]

Well - it appears that first, at least in airport bathrooms, it is their feet . . .

If more democrats would stick to gay sex instead of illegal activity we would be much better off.

 

[Moonbeam]

PJ's theory is that if you take a crap it draws flies. So he craps and he craps and he craps in the bon ton literary language of alcoholism.

 

[Ldir]

LOL. Yeah how did that work out? Its almost like they purposely set the women's movement back like 20 years.

Like Sara Palin did for the Repubs, amirite?

 

[Fear No Evil]

Like Sara Palin did for the Repubs, amirite?

Doesn't seem like it the way the left keeps going after her. Did we ever hear anything about Mondale's VP after that? Ferarro?

 

[Scotteq]

None of this has anything to do with "Women", per se.


It has everything to do with vilifying "the other side", using every angle possible, and in the strongest terms possible. So you call a woman a 'whore', because that is what the current political atmosphere supports doing. Behind the same set of closed doors they'd call a Gay Republican a "i love you", too. It's meaningless, and intended only to hurt or smear the opposing party.

But that's OK - Both sides do it to each other equally. This is the essence of our current 'Political Freedom'.

 

[woolfe9999]

Clearly the "Liberals" who seated 13 of the 17 women currently in the Senate; who seated 57 of the 74 women currently in the House of Representatives, including the first woman Speaker; who seated all three of the women currently on the Supreme Court; who very nearly nominated the first major party woman candidate for president then made her Secretary of State; clearly, these are the misogynists in the current political scene, placing these women in unprecedented positions of power only to conceal the depths of their misogyny.

Nevermind the meta-facts. Anecdotal quotes are a far more entertaining and provocative way to "prove" a point.

- wolf

 

[Atreus21]

Clearly the "Liberals" who seated 13 of the 17 women currently in the Senate; who seated 57 of the 74 women currently in the House of Representatives, including the first woman Speaker; who seated all three of the women currently on the Supreme Court; who very nearly nominated the first major party woman candidate for president then made her Secretary of State; clearly, these are the misogynists in the current political scene, placing these women in unprecedented positions of power only to conceal the depths of their misogyny when other women happen not to agree with the leftist ideology.

Fixed.

 

[Atreus21]

How, exactly, is he incompetent? By what standard do you measure incompetency?

It's politics. Incompetence is measured by whomever yells louder.

How about we measure it against every president in the last 30 years, benchmarking them and their major scandals and failures.

How well do you think the last 3 Republican presidents would fare against the last 2 democratic ones?

The only Republican I would place in the top 3 would be George HW Bush, he was a smart guy and did reasonably well. As far as the other 2, I would place them 4 (Reagan) and 5 (Bush) out of the top 5.

If you can yell louder than me, you might just be right.

 

[Zebo]

There are reprobates everywhere you look. And good people too.

 

[her209]

Doesn't seem like it the way the left keeps going after her. Did we ever hear anything about Mondale's VP after that? Ferarro?

Why do you treat Sarah Palin as less than a man?

 

[Fear No Evil]

Why do you treat Sarah Palin as less than a man?

Please explain how I am? But, if I am, maybe I am just taking my example on how to treat women from the Democrats?

BTW.. I voted for Hillary in the primaries vs. Barack.. not many of you sexist pigs here can say that.