Astronomer, before I had any idea what the job would entail.
It was more than just taking pictures of stuff in space, so it lost a lot of the allure as far as a job goes. I can do that on the Internet now.
And I hate doing any kind of calculus. There are some things that numbers should just not be forced to do, and that's one of them.
I'm now going for a bachelor's degree in Mechanical Engineering Technology.
It's similar to a ME program, but without the calculus integration into the curriculum (though I did take ME-level calc I and II), and more hands-on lab experience.
I started in the ME program, but all the theory was getting rather dull. I'm in college for job training, and I needed to feel like I was doing something relevant and "real-world." The lead engineer at a company I interviewed with last week (internship) said he rather prefers MET's, as they've seen how some of the equipment works, and they also get more experience with 3D/solid-modeling software.
I see the hierarchy as this:
Scientists -> Engineers -> Engineering Technologists -> Technicians.
Scientists get the theory of how the basic principles work. Engineers, and to a degree the Engineering Technologists, figure out how to turn seemingly disconnected theories into a thing that can do something useful. Technicians build and service the devices.