DOC_Zenith
Junior Member
- Jun 21, 2017
- 5
- 1
- 41
Thank you, got that. I was not sure if this file includes those with -50mv and no in-system power consumption ones.
Ok, i've managed to do it. If anyone needs a modified asrock extreme 4 bios, here it is: https://www.sendspace.com/file/9jm96i
Thanks for such a great thread and all of your instructions guys!
That is strange i did mine with Ubu without any problems.I always thought that the only difference between the ASrock Extreme4 and Extreme4/3.1 was the addition of a USB 3.1 card to the latter...
But when I look a the downloads section for both, I see totally distinct BIOS versions and release dates...
So would you kindly be able to do the same operation you did for the Extreme4 BIOS on an Extreme4/3.1 BIOS?
Because I did try doing it the UBU way (for both v1.2 and v3.4) and wound up with identical results: A BIOS which would just "scream" at me (one long beep, until you switch off the power) when I try to enter setup after posting (didn't even try to let it boot my non-uefi Windows 2016).
OK so I tried v3x2_50_39_vcc.efi instead of v3. My cores all ramp up to 32x !!! BUT I am only getting 7950 on CPUz on a 18 core E5 2699 v3 ... Something is way off, I mean it did boost a little but ultimately nothing too special. Like the others in this forum.. Though I must have missed something? I can't figure out what. The EFI driver DID say something about a mere 30x on UNCORE ? Which is something I don't understand to be honest.
Anyhow if anyone out there reading this is able to help guide me a touch I would really love it thanks.![]()
I now have 2 x E5-2696 v3 on Supermicro X10DRL-i motherboard. I previously had 2 x E5-2658 v3 and it could reach max turbo speed (max x29, 2.9Ghz) on both processors. However, with E5-2696, I can only reach x32 on all cores. If I reduce # of cores in BIOS, say 10 cores, It seems that I can get max turbo speed on all cores. But, this will reduce # of cores available.
One interesting thing that I found out playing with BIOS, some settings makes different temperature +5/-5 C.
I don't think that efi files make much difference once mcode is removed in BIOS. It may make +/- 100mhz?
With my current settings,
CPU1 - temp: 40C, x32 multiplier on all cores, x38 on spike
CPU2 - temp: 38C, x31 multiplier on all cores, x38 on spike
CPUZ Bench: Single: 423, Multi: 7562
Cinebench R15: 5000
I may settle on this unless there is new tweak coming out.
Hmm that means that our processors at 18 cores are quiet a deal slower than other models despite what gtx and others were claiming about these being the fastest. While sporting fewer processors and cheaper price tags at that. I think I saw a 10 core xeon receiving 16000 on the multi in cpuz bench. That is nothing to be scoffed at that's literally twice as fast and then some with a fewer cored processor. Something about how our processor is being handled at the power limiting level makes this not such a performance increase really. And at the loss of stability, C states and thermal for us what is the bother. Heck we should get a 10 core xeon too, Or am I mistaken did someone get 18 cores at 38 at least something more substantial with this mod and our processor. Personally I think its being throttle at the Max power being locked at 65 watts. Maybe i'm wrong this is a hopeless en-devour.
How did you get the cinebench 5000 test with 2 processors? Or each can do ?
efi with vccin
Hi! I bought a X99-DELUXE II too. Please, can you share your modded bios? I'm afraid do it myself. Thanks!Dear all,
not really new to forum but really registed today to post this.
follow page 3's steps post by C-Power (which a total info gathering steps of both two genius, Dufus and stlit)
and my 2699 v3 can finally meets 6950x on single thread bench(cpu-z and 10-cores enable, 3.6g tb), happy with both my compute and gaming usage just with a click on bios settings(thx asus for my fav profiles LOL)
my workstation configuration:
MB: Asus X99-DELUXE-II
CPU: Xeon E5-2699 v3 ES (with 306F2h rev)
and other not so important things to boot up.....
since post imgs is not so easy, so I'm just ignore the screenshots....
wish everyone happy mod![]()
Hi! I bought a X99-DELUXE II too. Please, can you share your modded bios? I'm afraid do it myself. Thanks!Hello Sciff, Awesome, that's great news! Thanks so much for all the contributions everyone!
So far, using VERCETY's instructions I was able to remove the Haswell-E microcode from the x99 deluxe II bios.
Cooler has not arrived yet.
Sciff, so you are saying no microcode in the bios, but as far as the vmware driver goes: 0x27 microcode for best performance or the 0x39 driver for better stability?
Or did you find a way to eliminate the microcode completely?
Also are there options to change turbo MSR's on the fly in windows 10 or is there a workable "idle" setting possible from the bios when there is no CPU load?
I think I read about someone who was able to use idle state for no load?
Same chip E5-2696 V3 on Asus Deluxe II Motherboard.
Thanks very much!
B9C
Try the the other v3 variants composed of different optimization settings that supposedly depending on your individual processor gives different results; with respect to the work of the authors ask for more details as I too am not fully settled on the what I perceive to be the most optimized settings for my composition.Hy all! I'm new here!
system: Z10PE-D16 WS with 2x 2683v3 (306F2, C0/C1, QS)
i struggeling with the stability and performance of the hack!
i used a flashed bios with only one microcode inside (0EF6F11F 2016/10/07)
first it hangs at boot screen (CPU CATERR), i solved this with disabeling C6 state and limited to C2
after 30min the pc will freez again with CATERR.....
i also done some testing with vray benchmark which is relly good for testing with high end processors
0:45 sec BiosMod
0:46 original 3407 Bios
0:41 original 3407 + 104 Bckl (CPU-Z Multi: 34275)
i used Bios + V3.EFI from this thread https://www.hardwareluxx.de/community/f101/all-core-turbo-dual-xeon-e5-1163969.html
a note, my SSD is in BOOTMNGR mode not UEFI so i'm only tried it with the temp solution via shell
are there any suggestions?
Thanks for your help
phil
Cinebench R15 score (5000) was done with two CPU. With 2 x E5-2658 v3 QS, I had 2800 without mod and 3300 with mod. As you mentioned about power usages, I checked mine and it said that 60W per CPU. And, I know that this CPU is rated 145W. Even fully loaded, it said that 60W is being used. I have no idea why it say that.
Also, the reason you believe that you have lower number on CPUz is because you are comparing the score from old version. The website's change logs for new release are below.
And, I ran two versions on my system and saw the different numbers due to different benchmark method.
- Intel X299 (1.79.1).
- AMD ThreadRipper (1.79.1).
- AMD Ryzen 5 and Ryzen 3.
- Fix lockup at loading on Ryzen systems with RAID.
- New benchmark version (17.01)
http://postimg.org/image/bp7feard9/
Cinebench R15 score (5000) was done with two CPU. With 2 x E5-2658 v3 QS, I had 2800 without mod and 3300 with mod. As you mentioned about power usages, I checked mine and it said that 60W per CPU. And, I know that this CPU is rated 145W. Even fully loaded, it said that 60W is being used. I have no idea why it say that.
Also, the reason you believe that you have lower number on CPUz is because you are comparing the score from old version. The website's change logs for new release are below.
And, I ran two versions on my system and saw the different numbers due to different benchmark method.
- Intel X299 (1.79.1).
- AMD ThreadRipper (1.79.1).
- AMD Ryzen 5 and Ryzen 3.
- Fix lockup at loading on Ryzen systems with RAID.
- New benchmark version (17.01)
http://postimg.org/image/bp7feard9/
Here: https://yadi.sk/d/aTzUlTl43KbFXy (it's version 1701, use BIOS Flashback only)Hi! I bought a X99-DELUXE II too. Please, can you share your modded bios? I'm afraid do it myself. Thanks!
That's impossible. I have a slightly more powerful E5-2696 V3, and it consumes up to 170-200 W in regular applications and up to 240 W when AVX2 extensions are being used. You are clearly looking at a wrong reading, look somewhere else.I highly doubt it is an tdp or tjmax or whatever limit, as Ive the the small 18core cpu "2686v3", and I am far away from my tdp levels or tjmax's (I use an oil cooling keeping whole environment on stress on max on 30°C, and even with "hacked mc" I keep under 105 Watt at full load).
I now have 2 x E5-2696 v3 on Supermicro X10DRL-i motherboard. I previously had 2 x E5-2658 v3 and it could reach max turbo speed (max x29, 2.9Ghz) on both processors. However, with E5-2696, I can only reach x32 on all cores. If I reduce # of cores in BIOS, say 10 cores, It seems that I can get max turbo speed on all cores. But, this will reduce # of cores available.
I may settle on this unless there is new tweak coming out.
OK so I tried v3x2_50_39_vcc.efi instead of v3. My cores all ramp up to 32x !!! BUT I am only getting 7950 on CPUz on a 18 core E5 2699 v3 ... Something is way off, I mean it did boost a little but ultimately nothing too special. Like the others in this forum..
Though I must have missed something? I can't figure out what. The EFI driver DID say something about a mere 30x on UNCORE ? Which is something I don't understand to be honest.
That's impossible. I have a slightly more powerful E5-2696 V3, and it consumes up to 170-200 W in regular applications and up to 240 W when AVX2 extensions are being used. You are clearly looking at a wrong reading, look somewhere else.
Hey James - thanks for sharing your experience and I am wondering how did you mod the bios for your supermicro motherboard? I have the following system and wondering if it is possible to mod the bios to achieve higher turbo:
Motherboard: X10SRL-F (latest bios)
CPU: Intel XEON E5 2696 v3