It's a big deal because it shows a difference in human perception. Wars are started for less due to lack of understanding. It's pretty crazy really.
Regardless of how the picture was taken, or what effects of lighting have, you still have 2 distinct perceptions of that very same picture. That is quite interesting (to many).
Why are people making a big deal about a PICTURE of something?
Yeah, it's like ink-blot testing, but instead of ink and paper it's a dress captured with shitty lighting and a crappy camera.
![]()
♫ Hey
Blue on black
Tears on a river
Push on a shove
It don't mean much
Joker on jack
Match on a fire
Cold on ice
A dead man's touch
Whisper on a scream
Doesn't change a thing
Don't bring you back
Blue on black
Oh yeah, blue on black ♫
Some people see blue on black, others see gold on white. Maybe it depends on where you start.
I can't make a judgement without feeling/seeing the fabric in person.
It could be a silk type fabric that has high reflection, causing all kinds of distortion.
It is so definitely white and gold.
Holy Crap!!! I now see the dress as blue and black. How freaking weird!!!! Even on the paper that I printed out.I see it as white gold.
I printed the picture of the dress
I still see it as white gold.
Those of you who see it as blue, can you print it and tell us what you see?
I thought the same thing, but then the white turned a medium blue and the gold turned an obvious black. I saved that picture to my phone and now it looks white/gold again. It is mind-blowing how different it looks when your brain switches over. I thought they were two different pictures.Thats missing the point though. Its about what colour you see in the picture not what colour the actual dress is.
I still cant see how anyone can see anything other than a goldish colour there.
Screw ISIS and Ukraine...but in all seriousness, we have enough of that every day, it's not that ISIS or Ukraine would be under-represented in current news media?
But THIS is interesting for so many reasons:
First of course because it's about human psychology and perception, a nice example how "reality" is often not so objective as some may assume. (Example: Witnesses of a crime or an accident where everyone is seeing something else).
THEN...and now it gets even better....is how people INSIST how their own, subjective view of things is "the correct one" while anyone else must be stupid, color-blind, mentally ill or whateverIt's human imperfection at its finest. This is why this is so interesting. Just love me some human psychology...
But on a side-note...yes I am pretty pissed now that I can NOT get back the "white gold" impression I had yesterday at first...so I am seriously wondering what the criterion was that I saw it as white/gold at first but not anymore. It's like once you go black/blue it won't go back.
The OTHER interesting thing to note here is how some people try to "rationalize" something which *per se* is subjective - with all sorts of technical "explanations", ranging from over-analyzing and explaining it with incorrectly calibrated monitors etc...or saying they're "unable to make a judgement without seeing the dress in person" <--- of course YOU CAN make a judgement, the picture is right before your face. (Which color the dress has "in real life" is not even the question here, I think we established already it's black/blue in reality).
Google trends says "white and gold dress" is more searched for than "black and blue dress"
I thought the same thing, but then the white turned a medium blue and the gold turned an obvious black. I saved that picture to my phone and now it looks white/gold again. It is mind-blowing how different it looks when your brain switches over. I thought they were two different pictures.
Try being outside for a while and then looking at it.
I know, I know, but expose your eyes to a certain kind of light an it just snaps in. It's dark black and a solid blue. It blew my mind. Seriously, look up a darkened version of the photo and that is what it looked like to me.I can see how the white/blue is debatable, white is usually a shade of blue anyway. But the gold is gold, or light brown, not black.
Try cropping the photo so you just get the bits of colour you want. The white/blue is a greyish blue which you can argue is white in the shade or blue in the light. But the gold looks... gold.
Anyone whom says white/gold is now OFFICIALLY wrong.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/thedress-goes-viral-sales-soar-164900819.html
I believe I read that 75ish% of people see it as gold and white, and 25ish% see it as black and blue.
I can see how the white/blue is debatable, white is usually a shade of blue anyway. But the gold is gold, or light brown, not black.
Try cropping the photo so you just get the bits of colour you want. The white/blue is a greyish blue which you can argue is white in the shade or blue in the light. But the gold looks... gold.
Where do I fit in? Because I see it as gold and blue.
I think you are misunderstanding the illusion. It's not that "it kinda looks bluish/goldish". It's that the brain actually registers the colors as black and blue without ambiguity. Same for the brains that register white/gold. It's not a matter of "why would someone confuse white and blue". It's a matter of "my brain sees white, your brain sees blue". Remember that some of us actually saw both versions of the dress and they absolutely looked like different dresses.