<<eventhough this one is frowned upon, might as well do the A+ too.>>
When I got my MCSE and the A+ was still relatively new, A+ was looked down upon by upper-level techs as an unnecessary certification. We were "beyond that test". Nowadays, you might be surprised at how many MCSE's don't know how to
a) assign IRQs
b) troubleshoot hardware problems
c) change a simple PCI card, or even more horrific yet, an ISA card
d) tell the difference between the SCSI versions
e) simply format a floppy disk or hard disk.
More and more employers are looking at the A+ as a benchmark for how much hardware common sense you have as a tech. Sure, you might know how to manage Active Directory, but what if the server crashes and it's not Windows' fault? Hmmmm...
So, when I have a chance, I'm going to go back and get those so-called "lesser certs" such as A+, Net+, iNet+ and Server+. Heck, couldn't hurt, my company pays for it, and if I supposedly already know the material, they should be easy.
<<you'd be suprised... these certs still have alot of clout... usually you're hired by some HR person who doesn't know how to rate experience in an industry they know very little about... when they see a cert, they are under the impression that you really do know your stuff. >>
I'd agree. Of course, the truth comes out sooner or later if you're worth the cert. But the cert will sometimes get your foot in the door, nonetheless.
My interview for my present company was a little different. Our HR person had a list of Microsoft-based and Cisco-based questions ready to ask me. The answers "Oh, that's not done in the 'real world'" and "That wasn't covered on the test" just do not apply during an interview. 🙂 After all, interviews and real technical experience are why we're pursuing these certs to begin with, right? Better jobs, better pay, more promotions?