it will be great for an emulation PC
This is correct,I would just like to quickly add that moving a R9 290 from a 4770K to a 3600X increased FPS by 10-20% so anything faster than a RX580/GTX 1060 will be leaving some performance on the table. I'd definitely look at 6/8GB VRAM though, 580, 1660, 3050, 6600 for example.
He's going to be devastated when he finds out the 3090 is off the table.rtx3090 - design defect in the double sided memory
You laugh, but the Asian mining surplus cards have yet to hit the market.He's going to be devastated when he finds out the 3090 is off the table.
I would probably go with an RX 480/580 8GB.
I would disagree. People with cards a few days old were getting fried left and right. It was not just EVGA, and it was not just the inadequate backside cooling ( or complete lack thereof ). Something in the power supply for the memory was not right.Finally, I would like to add that the 3090 does not necessarily have a design defect. It is not optimal, as some chips will get hotter than others, but I wouldn't call it defective. Anyway, I wouldn't pair anything of that high end nature with a 4770S for gaming.
I don't think there is that much difference between a 480/580/590, probably a lot less, of course it will vary by clocks and PCB/cooler design a bit. Also, RX 400 and 500 series are pretty much the same thing hardware wise, so they will likely go DOA at the same point IMO. Now AMD could do differently, but it wouldn't make sense, they are all Polaris.Don't forget about the rx590! A update on its better known cousins the rx480 and 580, and far less well known. More likely to go cheap on ebay as result.
rx590 released in December 2018
rx580 released in April 2017
rx480 released in June 2016
An rx590 will have about 2.5 less years in the mines then a rx480. Also has about 10% more performance then a rx580, and 20% more performance then the rx480.
AMD has already stop issuing new game optimizations on the rx300 series, and the rx400 series will be next. But the rx500 series sold very well, and I feel it will be a long time before those get the axe.
As for the 3090 frying issue, this was not a double sided memory issue AFAIK. I thought it was more of a QA issue, but I suppose it could be argued it was a design flaw, with using the POScaps and drivers allowing boosting too high. Still, it wasn't design defect due to double sided memory that caused this.I would disagree. People with cards a few days old were getting fried left and right. It was not just EVGA, and it was not just the inadequate backside cooling ( or complete lack thereof ). Something in the power supply for the memory was not right.
Don't forget about the rx590! A update on its better known cousins the rx480 and 580, and far less well known. More likely to go cheap on ebay as result.
rx590 released in December 2018
rx580 released in April 2017
rx480 released in June 2016
An rx590 will have about 2.5 less years in the mines then a rx480. Also has about 10% more performance then a rx580, and 20% more performance then the rx480.
AMD has already stop issuing new game optimizations on the rx300 series, and the rx400 series will be next. But the rx500 series sold very well, and I feel it will be a long time before those get the axe.
rx590 vs rx580 - 10%:I don't think there is that much difference between a 480/580/590, probably a lot less, of course it will vary by clocks and PCB/cooler design a bit.
I will say the 590 could also be a decent option, the only caution here is I feel those might not actually last as long as the 580 cards, due to being the same hardware but pushed further. Or was there an actual hardware resfresh/die shrink with these, or did they just have higher clocks and beefier coolers? I cannot remember exactly. Anyway, use good judgement based on what you find available and what the price is.
No! That is wrong!I wouldn't recommend a 590X as it really pushed power to get relatively little gains.
Lastly, if you want to go a bit higher, the Vega 56/64 could do well (instead of a 1070 or 1080), as long as you are getting one with a good cooler. These cards of some brands had really bad cooling designs, mostly for reference and some coolers such as with Gigabtyte cards, but the Sapphire Nitro and Powercolor Red Dragon designs were excellent.
I suppose mining with the HBM2 could be an issue with some, but I seem to recall the HBM could not actually be overvolted, though the core was usually undervolted. I would focus on checking the fans of used cards instead, and of course check for general stability, and that there isn't a mining BIOS flashed. Of course, do the necessary research first.
rx590 vs rx580 - 10%:
Radeon RX 590 vs Radeon RX 580
We compare the Radeon RX 590 against the Radeon RX 580 across a wide set of games and benchmarks to help you choose which you should get.hwbench.com
rx590 vs rx480 - 20%:
Radeon RX 590 vs Radeon RX 480
We compare the Radeon RX 590 against the Radeon RX 480 across a wide set of games and benchmarks to help you choose which you should get.hwbench.com
That is pretty significant to me.
No! That is wrong!
rx590 uses 10 less watts then the rx580:
What you both missed is the rx590 is a redesign of the rx580, moving it from 14nm GF to 12nm TSMC. The 590 is just a better chip, uses less power, runs cooler, and clocks higher. The rx590 was AMDs first TSMC GPU! AMDs first high end TSMC product!
This was the tipping point, after the rx590 AMD would slowly move everything to TSMC. The rx590 is not only important historically, it is also the best rx500 series product!
I didn't miss a thing. The Rx 590 has a 40W higher TDp at 225W vs 185W of the 580. it was also 12nm GloFo, not TSMC. Remember when Anandtech used to review GPU's?
Lithography: TSMC 12nm FinFET
Did some digging around. Also seeing claims of 12nm GF and 11nm Samsung for the rx590. Looking for something official now.
With current pricing I'd suggest a RX 6600 8GB & undervolt it.
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-radeon-rx-590,5907.html
https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/radeon-rx-590.c3322
Global Foundries 12nm
They made a compelling argument off the chip size, but do not claim to actually know.As such, we're probably seeing GlobalFoundries' 12nm LP process
in the notes (scroll down a bit). Which I found fascinating.This chip comes in both Samsung 11nm and GlobalFoundries 12nm.
Your toms hardware link discusses it a bit, it finally concludes:
They made a compelling argument off the chip size, but do not claim to actually know.
Your tech power up link is interesting, as it claims:
in the notes (scroll down a bit). Which I found fascinating.