The shotgun, IMO and experience, is a more suitable weapon for this individual, if he is truly concerned about protecting himself and his family inside his home. I can't find the article but I read that even law enforcement has like a 1/7 hit/miss ratio when they have to discharge their firearms (this did not include SWAT/HRT type teams). I have nothing against handguns, I love to shoot them. I have expert medals with the .45, 9mm, .38, M14 and M16. However if I was again having to keep a weapon loaded in the house for self protection ( I don't right now because I live on the base) it would be, as it has in the past, a shotgun loaded with 00.
Perfectly valid take IMHO. I would prefer a handgun were I him, but I think either would be a valid choice.
One note, though: 01 is better than 00. You get much more lead and the FPS doesn't fall off much at all.
I can't find the book--it's by Peter Hathaway Capstick--in which he explains his test that shows that the amount of lead you're cost by the air between 00 pellets and 01 is really very detrimental. Heck, within 10 yards 8 shot will do a fine job though 🙂
I would be very curious to see the hit/miss ratio with a shotgun, though. I'm much better with it just because of skeet shooting/waterfowling, but I'd be interested to see how well people do with it generally.
As for hollow points blowing a six inch hole: I didn't know that hollow points were now explosive 🙂 The idea is that they'll transfer all the kinetic energy of the round into destruction of flesh in the individual at whom it is aimed by mushrooming rapidly. The problem is that if you hit a bone, it's not unlikely that the bullet will lose all its good ballistic properties as it moves into a couple pieces. When I used to hunt deer, I'd insist on solids on the theory that a neat little hole in the pump room will do enough damage all the time. It didn't matter, of course, and something like a soft point would have been perfectly wonderful. Same, I think, goes for handgun rounds.
One man's opinion