- Status
TastesLikeChicken
Lifer
- Sep 12, 2004
- 16,852
- 59
- 86
The man behind the curtain sent Dorothy back to Kansas. You should take heed and return to reality yourself.
LunarRay
Diamond Member
- Mar 2, 2003
- 9,993
- 1
- 76
Objection, your honor... Facts not in evidence!
The Good Witch, the blond one, told Dorothy how to get home.... heheheheheh. I think she sorta cast a spell on them ruby slippers too...
The alleged wizard with all his bells and whistles couldn't do it... but then, he didn't have ALL the tools...
nerp
Diamond Member
- Dec 31, 2005
- 9,865
- 105
- 106
Truthers are dumbasses. And that's a fact.
BTW, I do think that the flight 93 or whatever was shot down and the whole 'let's roll' thing was just a nice story to make the families feel better about it. But that's the only "conspiracy" I think there is. The rest of it is a bunch of whackjobs flying planes into buildings that werent' designed to handle jetliners flying into them.
BTW, I do think that the flight 93 or whatever was shot down and the whole 'let's roll' thing was just a nice story to make the families feel better about it. But that's the only "conspiracy" I think there is. The rest of it is a bunch of whackjobs flying planes into buildings that werent' designed to handle jetliners flying into them.
nerp
Diamond Member
- Dec 31, 2005
- 9,865
- 105
- 106
As much as I hate conspiracy theories, I do say it wouldn't be hard to make 'phone calls' from the plane and create a 'wife' who 'recieved those calls' etc yadda yadda. The legit wives and husbands on the ground never get any calls. Just because someone is teary-eyed on dateline doesn't mean she/he isn't an operative.
TastesLikeChicken
Lifer
- Sep 12, 2004
- 16,852
- 59
- 86
Shows how long it's been since I've watched the WoO.
Then again, it turned out it was all a dream after Dorothy suffered a nasty konk on the noggin, wasn't it?
Maybe that's Kyle's excuse?
LunarRay
Diamond Member
- Mar 2, 2003
- 9,993
- 1
- 76
In this case, testimony, affidavits and the like would have been taken under oath. That is strong evidence! I don't think any of what they said about 'let's roll' is 'Material' as it goes to the aircraft status as a high jacked by terrorist aircraft, so perjury is not an issue. But, if these spouses did perjure their testimony KNOWINGLY to further a conspiracy then it is an issue.
Me, I take it all at face value. Why shoot down the dam plane? Why should terrorists terminate their flight in a field when targets of opportunity were not far away? I think it happened as has been stated by Government.
- Mar 25, 2000
- 9,396
- 0
- 0
I'm quoting comments on WTC7 from this thread:
It's not about numbers, it's about percentages, 100% of the resistive force to hold the building up as it stood, and then right about 0% through around the first 105' of the fall.
You can boggle on the complexities of it, or iterate them out in detail as NIST did in their model, but you can't change the fact that the free fall could not have happened without some yet to be identified forces acting on the system. That is why NIST can't release their model, but rather only tiny video clips of it which show no free fall or anything which could even come close to allowing for it, which they did while they were still denying free fall.
No, the conclusion is the value of Fr, as you noted previously.
Right, and I showed were NIST had done that in the OP.
Rather, the bitching for equations from people who can't even make a mathematical argument of their own is the handwaving, as is their bitching about how simple the math is even though I had previously told them it would be, and handwaving is all the falsers have as there is no way to prove the official story of WTC7's fall correct, mathematically or otherwise.
- Mar 25, 2000
- 9,396
- 0
- 0
Also from the other thread:
TLC falsely accuses me of not being able to understand this fact, yet it exactly that which allows me to know that around 8 stories worth of supporting structure worth were displaced by some yet to be identified forces, as to suggest the supports failed first and then the building drops is Looney Toons physics.
- Mar 25, 2000
- 9,396
- 0
- 0
As far as those of us here goes I am, while most of the rest of you are digging your heads in the sand. Perhaps if you saw a retired NASA engineering executive talk about it you might find that more convincing. The part about WTC7 starts at 1:27:00 of the video linked here.
Direct link to the video.
- Mar 25, 2000
- 9,396
- 0
- 0
That seems very unlikely. Are you asking because you do, or are you just not capable of developing and/or expressing your own thoughts?
Did you follow the link there to this page? If so, and that doesn't work, I'd try updating Flash first, and if that doesn't work perhaps try with a different web browser.
Ozoned
Diamond Member
- Mar 22, 2004
- 5,578
- 0
- 0
You truthers all have something in common. You don't really care about what you don't believe, because you believe something else. You haven't spent months on this to simply try and disprove the official story. Why not just come out of your closet and say what it is you believe?
LunarRay
Diamond Member
- Mar 2, 2003
- 9,993
- 1
- 76
I think NIST's effort is a pretty good start, don't you... I mean we know everything there is to know about 767 and 757 aircraft and other stuff like that. All we need now is for all the evidence from what ever source to be evaluated by experts in the requisite fields who provide the research as an academic pursuit and save the tax payer big bucks...
- Status
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 22K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
News NVIDIA and Intel to Develop AI Infrastructure and Personal Computing Products- Started by poke01
- Replies: 403
-
Facebook
Twitter