• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

what are you guys gettin wit 3dmark2001?

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
2073 Default settings
2503 640*480*16

Using Win2k on Duron700@950 with Geforce2MX @220/205

It seems like processor power is still very important, although T&L does help.

Win2k seems to cause a real loss of score.
 
Just ran it with my work computer.

462 "3DMarks"
CPU: PII 400 (compaq OEM)
RAM: 128mb PC100
Video: Matrox G400 16mb (compaq OEM)
Win2K Pro

Pretty pathetic.. 🙂 I'll run and post scores with my rigs at home later.
 
Tbird 1GHz @ 1350
512MB PC150
64MB Herc Prophet Pro w/ 1080 detonators & 4.28 4-in-1's
Win 2K

3845
 
2675

P!!! 550@~700
Elsa Gladiac MX (geforce 2 mx) not OC'ed
benched @ 640 x 480 16 bit no AA (crap montior doesn't run 1024 x 768)
 
just downloaded the 10.80 win2k drivers and my score went up over 300 points to 3394!
I would recommend downloading these
 
glen, just d/l that "fraps" program and let it run while your running the 3DMark2k1 demo and you'll be able to view the frame rates through that.
 
just downloaded the 10.80 win2k drivers and my score went up over 300 points to 3394!
I would recommend downloading these


Just tried them fitzhue...my normally clocked Thunderbird+Geforce2 GTS went from 3028 to 3231.

Overclocked Thunderbird+Geforce2 GTS went from 3348 to 3589

The best part is the high detail dragothic scene, it went from 10fps-20fps to 15-30fps! Overclocked settings went from 12-21 to 19-33fps!
 
Running at 1024x768 32bit colour,no FSAA 900mhz T-bird & GF2 MX(not overclocked)256mb ram

2072

🙂
 
My office machine:

Dell Dimension 4100 866MHz
256MB RAM
Riva TNT2 Model 64
WD 204BA disk drive

3DMark 2001 Score 787 :disgust:
 
1404
1024x768x16
Voodoo5/Duron 650@750/Win98SE

For fun, I turned on 4x FSAA and ran the test again with same settings and got...
1118
 
4042 3DMarks 1t 1024x768x32 bit color

1.2GHZ T-Bird(9x133)
Crucial 512MB PC133 CL2 RAM
MSI K7T Turbo
Elsa Gladiac Ultra (280/480)
Windows 2000
 
Maybe we should see who got the LOWEST 3dmark 2001 score. So far....I think I'm the lowest. I have a k6-2 450 and a V3 2000 and got 441 at 640x480. I can sum 3dmark 2001 on this computer in one word......CHUG! *LOL* 🙂jcwagers

I reran the tests and got this. Heh....this is pitiful!

V3 2000 @166

640 - 458
800 - 448
1024 - 446
 
i got 2357 for 3dmark2001
1024*768 32 bit

the test skipped the nature because i don't have hardware support for it

what does it mean??
 
Just ran 640 X 480 x 16 for kicks and was suprised it only gave me 5842 on my P4 @ 1.875 GHZ with a GF2 Ultra.
 
Here ya go:

Operating System: Microsoft Windows 98
Processor: Intel Pentium® III @ 550MHz
Graphics Card: RADEON DDR
Total Physical Memory: 256MB
Free Physical Memory: 159.77MB
Motherboard Manufacturer: ASUSTeK Computer INC.
Motherboard Model: CUSL2
DirectX Version: 8.0

1024x768, 32-bit color, compressed textures
D3D Hardware T&L, No AA

Score: 2112



<< Is that a good thing, or a bad thing >>

 
Back
Top