Originally posted by: destrekor
Originally posted by: BudAshes
There is an even worse commercial out where they have "real" people using a supposed brand new secret operating system they are going to release. They show the people talking about how great it is and then they reveal to them it was Windows Vista all along. They are admitting that vista has such a bad rep people hate it before they even try it.
why is that bad? A company admitting that for no real reason of their own fault, their product was getting a bad rep... I'm glad Microsoft did that... shows that people are not educated about Vista and they are admitting partial fault. However, the original fault lied with developers not making (proper)drivers initially. I love Vista. I find it more stable, and personally, better, than XP. Other than stability improvements through updated kernel, and some new features, it's just a dressed up 2000/XP. Get a different theme and customize it to be like 2000/XP if you want. It's a more logical step than XP was from 2000.
I look forward to Windows 7 though, as Vista was more a testbed, and 7 will get all the new features that had been promised for Vista.
Originally posted by: BudAshes
Originally posted by: destrekor
Originally posted by: BudAshes
There is an even worse commercial out where they have "real" people using a supposed brand new secret operating system they are going to release. They show the people talking about how great it is and then they reveal to them it was Windows Vista all along. They are admitting that vista has such a bad rep people hate it before they even try it.
why is that bad? A company admitting that for no real reason of their own fault, their product was getting a bad rep... I'm glad Microsoft did that... shows that people are not educated about Vista and they are admitting partial fault. However, the original fault lied with developers not making (proper)drivers initially. I love Vista. I find it more stable, and personally, better, than XP. Other than stability improvements through updated kernel, and some new features, it's just a dressed up 2000/XP. Get a different theme and customize it to be like 2000/XP if you want. It's a more logical step than XP was from 2000.
I look forward to Windows 7 though, as Vista was more a testbed, and 7 will get all the new features that had been promised for Vista.
I'm not sure marketing about how you fail at marketing is a sound strategy.
I can't think of anything less funny than the Apple ads. Except maybe Will Ferrel, but it's close.Originally posted by: Soviet
Yeah, the mac ads are funny, even though macs seem to be nothing but PC's with OSX these days.
Originally posted by: BudAshes
Originally posted by: destrekor
Originally posted by: BudAshes
There is an even worse commercial out where they have "real" people using a supposed brand new secret operating system they are going to release. They show the people talking about how great it is and then they reveal to them it was Windows Vista all along. They are admitting that vista has such a bad rep people hate it before they even try it.
why is that bad? A company admitting that for no real reason of their own fault, their product was getting a bad rep... I'm glad Microsoft did that... shows that people are not educated about Vista and they are admitting partial fault. However, the original fault lied with developers not making (proper)drivers initially. I love Vista. I find it more stable, and personally, better, than XP. Other than stability improvements through updated kernel, and some new features, it's just a dressed up 2000/XP. Get a different theme and customize it to be like 2000/XP if you want. It's a more logical step than XP was from 2000.
I look forward to Windows 7 though, as Vista was more a testbed, and 7 will get all the new features that had been promised for Vista.
I'm not sure marketing about how you fail at marketing is a sound strategy.
Originally posted by: BW86
i thought it was alright
Originally posted by: Playmaker
Agreed, it was bad.
Instead, they should have played up the fact that, in the pc vs mac ads, the PC guy is wearing a suit and looks like he's at least employed, whereas the mac guy looks ~32 years old and dresses like he still lives in his parents' basement.
Originally posted by: Polish3d
Say what you want about Windows, and there is plenty to complain about, but I would never prefer a Mac. I use Macs in our school lab sometimes and I can't stand their operating system
Originally posted by: bullbert
Originally posted by: Polish3d
Say what you want about Windows, and there is plenty to complain about, but I would never prefer a Mac. I use Macs in our school lab sometimes and I can't stand their operating system
Say what you want about Macs, but remember that MS Windows was just a pirated version of Mac Windows. Bill's father (a lawyer, and later Pres of the Bar) had set Bill up with the most cut-throat team of contract and IP lawyers that had ever existed on the technology frontier, and they raped and pillaged their way through Apple and IBM, and dozens of other IP developers in the late 1970s and 1980s.
But Windoze is the standard (aka monolopy) for PC gaming, so we continue to live with it.
Originally posted by: Smilin
Originally posted by: bullbert
Originally posted by: Polish3d
Say what you want about Windows, and there is plenty to complain about, but I would never prefer a Mac. I use Macs in our school lab sometimes and I can't stand their operating system
Say what you want about Macs, but remember that MS Windows was just a pirated version of Mac Windows. Bill's father (a lawyer, and later Pres of the Bar) had set Bill up with the most cut-throat team of contract and IP lawyers that had ever existed on the technology frontier, and they raped and pillaged their way through Apple and IBM, and dozens of other IP developers in the late 1970s and 1980s.
But Windoze is the standard (aka monolopy) for PC gaming, so we continue to live with it.
ROFL. Dude here's a hint: Anyone that uses M$ or Windoze is going to be viewed as a tard regardless of whatever point you are making. Don't act 12.
Also Windows in it's current form basically came about when MS was developing OS/2 for IBM and decided they could do one better. As for the concept of a windowed gui that came from Xerox, not Apple or MS. Xerox PARC also was instrumental in the mouse and ethernet.
Don't come in here spouting your kiddie theories and expect the folks here to buy it. You'll have to do better than that.
Run along now.
Originally posted by: bullbert
Originally posted by: Smilin
Originally posted by: bullbert
Originally posted by: Polish3d
Say what you want about Windows, and there is plenty to complain about, but I would never prefer a Mac. I use Macs in our school lab sometimes and I can't stand their operating system
Say what you want about Macs, but remember that MS Windows was just a pirated version of Mac Windows. Bill's father (a lawyer, and later Pres of the Bar) had set Bill up with the most cut-throat team of contract and IP lawyers that had ever existed on the technology frontier, and they raped and pillaged their way through Apple and IBM, and dozens of other IP developers in the late 1970s and 1980s.
But Windoze is the standard (aka monolopy) for PC gaming, so we continue to live with it.
ROFL. Dude here's a hint: Anyone that uses M$ or Windoze is going to be viewed as a tard regardless of whatever point you are making. Don't act 12.
Also Windows in it's current form basically came about when MS was developing OS/2 for IBM and decided they could do one better. As for the concept of a windowed gui that came from Xerox, not Apple or MS. Xerox PARC also was instrumental in the mouse and ethernet.
Don't come in here spouting your kiddie theories and expect the folks here to buy it. You'll have to do better than that.
Run along now.
'WinDoze' term is over 18 years old. Older than your maturity level.
Apple stole the concept of a windowed gui that came from Xerox, but MS stole the source code from Apple.
Originally posted by: StinkyPinky
Originally posted by: bullbert
Originally posted by: Smilin
Originally posted by: bullbert
Originally posted by: Polish3d
Say what you want about Windows, and there is plenty to complain about, but I would never prefer a Mac. I use Macs in our school lab sometimes and I can't stand their operating system
Say what you want about Macs, but remember that MS Windows was just a pirated version of Mac Windows. Bill's father (a lawyer, and later Pres of the Bar) had set Bill up with the most cut-throat team of contract and IP lawyers that had ever existed on the technology frontier, and they raped and pillaged their way through Apple and IBM, and dozens of other IP developers in the late 1970s and 1980s.
But Windoze is the standard (aka monolopy) for PC gaming, so we continue to live with it.
ROFL. Dude here's a hint: Anyone that uses M$ or Windoze is going to be viewed as a tard regardless of whatever point you are making. Don't act 12.
Also Windows in it's current form basically came about when MS was developing OS/2 for IBM and decided they could do one better. As for the concept of a windowed gui that came from Xerox, not Apple or MS. Xerox PARC also was instrumental in the mouse and ethernet.
Don't come in here spouting your kiddie theories and expect the folks here to buy it. You'll have to do better than that.
Run along now.
'WinDoze' term is over 18 years old. Older than your maturity level.
Apple stole the concept of a windowed gui that came from Xerox, but MS stole the source code from Apple.
So they are equally guilty and Xerox got ripped off, not Apple. What's your point?
