Werewolf Game #8675309 - BAD WINS!...and I do too.

[Dr. Zaus]

That's really not fair to Ken. Hope he posts.

Your right; I don't want to band-wagon someone just because he calls everyone an ass-hat.

Alive What I mean is, how should we play the seer?

I agree that if we collectively state who it should be we'll do better.

Anyone want to do the truth table on this one?

 

[ALIVE]

Your right; I don't want to band-wagon someone just because he calls everyone an ass-hat.

Alive What I mean is, how should we play the seer?

I agree that if we collectively state who it should be we'll do better.

Anyone want to do the truth table on this one?

well we may start a second voting also for whom the seer must check
after 2-3 turns the seer and fool will come out and tell the findings

that will give 3 names to go around plus the seer which will give team good a good majority to lynch the bad ones

41/152

 

[ALIVE]

i vote for dixycrat to be invistigated in the night

 

[JujuFish]

The only real way to play the seer/fool roles is to have each keep investigating and hope one of them comes across an inconsistency. The only way for that to happen (that I can see) would be having someone previously investigated lynched. You'd then be able to compare what you know from the lynch with what you received as "seer". Of course, it's not foolproof (har har), since the fool may have randomly gotten accurate information on that person.

 

[Agent11]

The only real way to play the seer/fool roles is to have each keep investigating and hope one of them comes across an inconsistency. The only way for that to happen (that I can see) would be having someone previously investigated lynched. You'd then be able to compare what you know from the lynch with what you received as "seer". Of course, it's not foolproof (har har), since the fool may have randomly gotten accurate information on that person.

That's probably the only way to trust what they find, they would have to choose someone in advance, investigate and then try to sway popular opinion to lynch that person though.

 

[drum]

The only real way to play the seer/fool roles is to have each keep investigating and hope one of them comes across an inconsistency. The only way for that to happen (that I can see) would be having someone previously investigated lynched. You'd then be able to compare what you know from the lynch with what you received as "seer". Of course, it's not foolproof (har har), since the fool may have randomly gotten accurate information on that person.

Thats just it, even if the lynched person matched what the seer was told, they may have gotten a random correct statement. You would really need that to happen twice to feel good about being the seer.

 

[drum]

should someone volunteer to sac themselves for the next day if they agreed to be investigated for the good of the town?

 

[Agent11]

should someone volunteer to sac themselves for the next day if they agreed to be investigated for the good of the town?

How noble of you drum, I'm sure the townspeople all appreciate your selflessness.

 

[Possessed Freak]

Now wait, who are we voting for? Was it rasczak?

 

[ALIVE]

How noble of you drum, I'm sure the townspeople all appreciate your selflessness.

lol we do not need that
we will vote 3 days whom will be invistiagete
after that botht he seer will come out and tell the findings
then it will be game over for the bad guys
you can do the math or not???

 

[ALIVE]

Now wait, who are we voting for? Was it rasczak?

do not vote like that is for lynching purposes
do not confuse vote fro lynching and vote for investigating

maybe dixycrat italic for the invistigation

 

[drum]

How noble of you drum, I'm sure the townspeople all appreciate your selflessness.

mere suggestion being thrown out there. Was certainly not demanding someone give themselves up.

 

[Possessed Freak]

do not vote like that is for lynching purposes
do not confuse vote fro lynching and vote for investigating

maybe dixycrat italic for the invistigation

I was voting for lynching, but thank you.

 

[PenguinPower]

Voting as of 1:00pm CST:

MonKENy: 4
rasczak: 3
ALIVE: 2

 

[Cerpin Taxt]

Would there be any benefit to instructing the two seers to investigate the same person? We'd get two separate answers about that person, but we'd know that one of them is true.

Does the fool get truly random results, or is there any influence of the moderator in what information the fool gathers?

 

[drum]

Would there be any benefit to instructing the two seers to investigate the same person? We'd get two separate answers about that person, but we'd know that one of them is true.

Does the fool get truly random results, or is there any influence of the moderator in what information the fool gathers?

not necessarily. that's the problem.

 

[PenguinPower]

Would there be any benefit to instructing the two seers to investigate the same person? We'd get two separate answers about that person, but we'd know that one of them is true.

Does the fool get truly random results, or is there any influence of the moderator in what information the fool gathers?

The Fool's results from an investigation are truly random (using random.org).

 

[ALIVE]

Would there be any benefit to instructing the two seers to investigate the same person? We'd get two separate answers about that person, but we'd know that one of them is true.

Does the fool get truly random results, or is there any influence of the moderator in what information the fool gathers?

well we can not use the seer fool independent cause it would mean that we will actually know them and thus the woolfs will know them so we will give them as food to them.

45/168

 

[ALIVE]

The Fool's results from an investigation are truly random (using random.org).

the mason can recruit or not???

 

[MonKENy]

well on of my problems is when people are online i was sleeping so i was never online when the talking was going on
but that did not kept me from being one with the most postttttttttttt

:whiste::whiste::whiste::whiste:
okey good luck to anyone
()()()()

the who speaks the most doesnt necessarily say the most

although thanks for not voting me off the first hit lol

I am a normal villager.

The body guard should know to guard himself every other night; unless someone that may be important is know.

Any ideas on how to run the seer folks?

Oh yea, and Monkeny I'm willing to change my vote; but I'd like to hear from you.

If we are calling roles Im a villager too. So sadly you wont see much of me as all I can do to contribute is vote.

hmmm but since Moto isnt posting I vote for him. T_Yamamoto

 

[PenguinPower]

the mason can recruit or not???

No.

 

[Cerpin Taxt]

not necessarily. that's the problem.

I don't see the problem. If the two seers investigate the same person and both get the same answer, we know that it is a true answer. If the answers differ, then we only know that 1 of them is true.

ALIVE makes a good point that indentifying the seers makes them targets for the wolves, however.

 

[Cerpin Taxt]

If we are calling roles Im a villager too. So sadly you wont see much of me as all I can do to contribute is vote.

Wolf-like typing detected.

 

[ALIVE]

the who speaks the most doesnt necessarily say the most

although thanks for not voting me off the first hit lol



If we are calling roles Im a villager too. So sadly you wont see much of me as all I can do to contribute is vote.

hmmm but since Moto isnt posting I vote for him. T_Yamamoto

well i was more pissed with the teleporter lol
but that does not mean i will not lynch you day 2
:whiste::whiste::whiste::whiste:

 

[highland145]

T_Yamamoto