• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Wendy's Racist Bee Commercial

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Back at work, can't read it at the moment. You're seem to be focusing on the "chinaman" one. Why not the "Jews" one? Does the Readskins name bother you? Is it the pictures that bother you?

But on another note, why do sports teams have to come up with some name other than the city and state in which they reside? But i don't care about sports teams so perhaps that's an unimportant question.

ATOT is so dead these days, it's been ages since I've added someone to my block list. Thanks for the action, JoeBleed!

Bye? continue walling yourself away from different opinions. I will not block you because i'm ok with trying to discuss something with you if you change your mind.

You'll probably find it easier to cope with life when you realise that its not your job to arbitrate on what other people are allowed to find offensive.
when i realize that it's not my job to arbitrate on what other people are allowed to find offence??? how about you realize you're not allowed to tell others what they should find offensive? Do you think it's a good thing to keep pushing things as being offensive and not instead move on to improve and grow? Why was this commercial offensive to you?

everyone can't be pleased, made happy, or avoid being offended. why try? why not work to not be offended by things? I used to be offended by being called 4 eyes. in elementary school and early middle school. Then i realized it's pointless. call me 4 eyes, i don't care. It's the only way i can see worth a damn.
 
Racism is bad, murder is bad, cancer is badder. Now, where's my PC Nobel Prize for my incredible accomplishment for functioning as a decent human being.
 
when i realize that it's not my job to arbitrate on what other people are allowed to find offence??? how about you realize you're not allowed to tell others what they should find offensive?

I'm not. I'm explaining to the hard of thinking why a company might not want to use an advert that offends some people. The fact that you don't find it offensive isn't going to help their sales if a few hundred thousand do.
 
Congratulations to Wendy's for being able to make a bee that made me think of Little Black Sambo.

I'm not offended by this or find it racist, I am blown away that nobody at Wendy's or the ad agency saw it. 1st time I saw the lips that's what instantly popped into my head.
 
Last edited:
I'm not. I'm explaining to the hard of thinking why a company might not want to use an advert that offends some people. The fact that you don't find it offensive isn't going to help their sales if a few hundred thousand do.

I can understand your point there, i understand that concept. I'm just not sure a lot of people actually find it raciest overall.

Edit: to add, maybe help clear it up, I think a small amount of people are making a lot of noise about it being raciest where most people don't agree and just aren't being that vocal.
 
Last edited:
Sometimes people say and do hurtful things without truly understanding why it hurts. I am 59 years old. As a black person in america, I have lived through some very trying times. When I was in junior high school, my best friend was white. We walked home from school together and she came to my house often. I'd never been to her house, but on one day, she needed to get something from home before coming to my house. As she walked to the door, she turned around and told me that I had to wait by the fence. She said, "My daddy doesn't allow the 'n' word in the house" She didn't understand why I was hurt, this term was used in her home all the time... and, well, wasn't I a the 'n' word?
yea, not to belittle your story, but that was then, this is now. i'm sure there are people similar to that still around, but they're likely the minority by far. however, people looking for things to hurt their feelings seem to be on the rise. they weren't doing black face, they just used animate lips on bees. what would be your suggesting to do that to indicate it was supposed to be the bees talking? having it without the animated lips doesn't seem as good now. not that it was a great commercial before, but it seems worse.
Why couldn't they have just had 'lips', did they have to be extremely large and in fact, larger than the head of the bee. That look has been used for years, and another member compared it to the look of the cartoon figure 'Jessica Rabbit'. Her lips were meant to be sexy, not make her look crass or crude. And yes, this is a different time, but many attitudes are still the same. What type of feelings was the young man trying to convey just last year when he sat in a church service in South Carolina and began to open fire on the members. I don't think that he thought they were terrorists...maybe someone there killed his dog? No... they were just black. Not black and trying to rob him, not black and threatening him...just black.
 
Congratulations to Wendy's for being able to make a bee that made me think of Little Black Sambo.

I'm not offended by this or find it racist, I am blown away that nobody at Wendy's or the ad agency saw it. 1st time I saw the lips that's what instantly popped into my head.
Just curious... are you black? I just became a member yesterday, and it seems like everyone who responds can't put themselves in the shoes of others for one minute. No matter, but thanks for recognizing it.
 
Why couldn't they have just had 'lips', did they have to be extremely large and in fact, larger than the head of the bee. That look has been used for years, and another member compared it to the look of the cartoon figure 'Jessica Rabbit'. Her lips were meant to be sexy, not make her look crass or crude. And yes, this is a different time, but many attitudes are still the same. What type of feelings was the young man trying to convey just last year when he sat in a church service in South Carolina and began to open fire on the members. I don't think that he thought they were terrorists...maybe someone there killed his dog? No... they were just black. Not black and trying to rob him, not black and threatening him...just black.

My guess as to why they made the lips big like that vs what they tend to do on claymation or other stop motion shows is to make them more visible due to the small size of the bees on the screen. So they stand out. I posted the the pic of jesica rabbit to show other characters use big red lips. there are others. i further posted the black and white candy can character from an old cartoon i watched. Nothing about her character, to me, ever stood out to indicate a race. she's just a monster in a cartoon.

for the dude that shot up the church, he had mental issues. a lot of mental issues from what i remember reading. I'm not saying racism is dead, i just don't see it around almost every corner or in most things.
 
Just curious... are you black? I just became a member yesterday, and it seems like everyone who responds can't put themselves in the shoes of others for one minute. No matter, but thanks for recognizing it.

I can understand an older black person seeing this and think about old raciest cartoon/characters. But why does it say they're being raciest to you? at what point do you say one particular thing is raciest and therefor must not be used anywhere?

Why is it that i don't see it as raciest mean i'm a raciest? I know you didn't say it, but i get the feeling a couple of people in this thread have that opinion. Why is not seeing so many things a raciest a bad thing? Because i'm not blaming black people for things, i don't think less of people because of their race. we're all different and every race has they own section of shitty people.
 
Ok, i also just rewatched it looking more at the bee lips/mouths. one of them has yellow lips. so this makes it look like even less of an issues. the size of the bees would make it even harder to see just little pencil lips and teeth to show up that well. It looks like just a way to emphasize the bees are what's supposed to be talking.
 
Ok, i also just rewatched it looking more at the bee lips/mouths. one of them has yellow lips. so this makes it look like even less of an issues. the size of the bees would make it even harder to see just little pencil lips and teeth to show up that well. It looks like just a way to emphasize the bees are what's supposed to be talking.

You're doing the "I'm not offended therefore no one else should be" thing again!
 
You're doing the "I'm not offended therefore no one else should be" thing again!

Because it doesn't make sense. based on why some of you are saying it is offensive. I'm also just stating my thoughts on it and why i came to that conclusion. you're just saying i should be offended because of big red lips and how some raciest cartoons/characters have been drawn in the past. At least that's how i'm reading it.

Edit: and aside from how the lips look, is there ANYTHING else about it that offends you? if so, what and why?
 
Because it doesn't make sense. based on why some of you are saying it is offensive. I'm also just stating my thoughts on it and why i came to that conclusion. you're just saying i should be offended because of big red lips and how some raciest cartoons/characters have been drawn in the past. At least that's how i'm reading it.
I'm not saying that you personally should be offended at all, I'm explaining that other people are.
 
917645167e9469d9996d777403d238bb.jpg


What about the first two? Are they OK as well?



They are trying to sell something. Its best not to piss huge numbers of people off when you're trying to sell stuff.

I don't see anything wrong with "Jews" is that not what they are called? Can replace that with any other thing like Christian or Catholic. Heck there is/was a hockey team called the saints, and it showed a cartoony angelic figure. I don't recall if it was just local or wider spread or if it even still exists, but it was not seen as derogatory at all.

I think "Chinaman" is considered a racist word though, or is it? If it just said Chinese it would probably be fine. Is referring to a place that serves Chinese food a "Chinese restaurant" considered racist?
 
Ignorance is amazing! If you were black, you would have been offended in the first 5 seconds. The large red lips have been used in anti- black american propaganda for decades. When I was in high school, in the 70's, I was given a "Back to Africa" ticket with the same replication. When these things are considered to represent your race , then you have the right to be offended, and this kind of thing will continue to happen as long as it remains acceptable. Years ago, AT&T ran an add about their long distance international calling using a map of the world depicting the people of all nations making calls. Every nation was represented by a person... except Africa. It was represented by a monkey.

Michelle,

What about Rocky Horror Picture show? Rolling Stones? Can't find pictures that aren't of obnoxious sizes (picture height and width)
 
My guess as to why they made the lips big like that vs what they tend to do on claymation or other stop motion shows is to make them more visible due to the small size of the bees on the screen. So they stand out. I posted the the pic of jesica rabbit to show other characters use big red lips. there are others. i further posted the black and white candy can character from an old cartoon i watched. Nothing about her character, to me, ever stood out to indicate a race. she's just a monster in a cartoon.

for the dude that shot up the church, he had mental issues. a lot of mental issues from what i remember reading. I'm not saying racism is dead, i just don't see it around almost every corner or in most things.
It's not 'around most corners', but there are still corners, that's my point. You can't just dismiss all because some has gotten better. I appreciate those like you who at least, try to see both sides. Thank you.
 
Just curious... are you black? I just became a member yesterday, and it seems like everyone who responds can't put themselves in the shoes of others for one minute. No matter, but thanks for recognizing it.
Does someone need to be black to have a meaningful opinion on something that involves race?

They are though, if if I remember correctly.
 
Does someone need to be black to have a meaningful opinion on something that involves race?

They are though, if if I remember correctly.
No, they don't have to be. I've just heard nothing but remarks from those who are either very young ( don't remember), very ignorant (don't care),or walking through life in 'these United States', with eyes closed.
 
People get worked up over anything these days. Cant even sell hamburgers using talking bees with cartoonish animated lips anymore.

Sheesh!
 
Last edited:
Just curious... are you black? I just became a member yesterday, and it seems like everyone who responds can't put themselves in the shoes of others for one minute. No matter, but thanks for recognizing it.

I do think there are a lot of people who aren't even attempting to be empathetic. But some of that is they seriously do not have the experiences to even do that. And I think that is another major problem is people being able to say they simply cannot get it and accept that. People want to try to understand, but when they can't make sense of things it bothers them so then they start trying to rationalize things in their own way, and we're seeing that a lot of people have flawed rationalization on a lot of topics.

And to a certain extent they are starting to willfully be not empathetic, because they feel like they're being forced to when they don't feel there is anything wrong but feel they're getting attacked for just having a differing opinion. Plus when you tell people that they don't understand something, that does not go over well. Its actually been shown that humans, when objectively shown to be wrong, will often double down and become more adamant about not being wrong.

In the past few years I've intentionally gone out of my way to expose myself to other people's experiences and a lot of it, especially initially can just seem like some craziness that they're blowing out of proportion, but the more that I actually looked the more I saw validity (even if I didn't agree with their reaction to it). Even then, I often struggled to "get it", meaning I can see it and consciously register it if I look, but it simply cannot give me the feeling/reaction that the people it is targeted towards get (for fairly obvious reasons), and so I also can't understand why they might react in what to me is an over the top manner for something that seems objectively slight. But I'm not barraged with lots of minor things that disparage and discriminate against me that I think objectively does happen against others, so I don't get the cumulative effects of being exposed to stuff like that.

I'd liken racism/bigotry to concussions. For a long time it was denied that it was any actual problem, then there started to be serious blatant situations where it became impossible to ignore. So things kinda changed to admit and address that stuff. In the US, people will look at the Civil War and Civil Rights laws that put an end to segregation and different things like that and say "see we did something about it" and then of course some think we went too far (affirmative action for instance), but overall people would say we did address that stuff. But, as we're finding out, all of the little ones, that tend to go unnoticed and thus unaddressed, are absolutely a big problem (maybe even bigger than the big ones, specifically because they go unchecked and the damage they do accumulates and compounds). We're at the stage where we're still struggling to adequately register when actual damage has been done, let alone figure out how to really address it. So its contentious, because there's arguments over it having occurred at all, let alone how damaging it is and how much it needs to be addressed if at all.

There's a lot of similar stuff that is happening and isn't about race, but other factors. For instance, poor white people are having a lot of the same things happen to them that was being done to black people, and so a lot of people see that and go "that's proof it isn't about race". And things get complex, because that is both true but also not. Its not about race (not saying absolutely, but objectively it typically would not be) when its being done to the poor white people, and sometimes it wasn't about them being black but being poor when it happened to the black people, but there was a lot of it that was (sadly that should be is) specifically because of them being black. But they were all still discriminated against in similar ways and it both did and did not have to do with racism.

Needless to say, there's a lot more complexity here than really ever gets addressed. And that doesn't even factor in that there's other races (so its definitely not a just a black/white issue), other ethnic groups, orientations, identities, religions, and then take all of that and compound it with history and that's why people feel like they do. Literally there's no way that people could be empathetic to all as they aren't even aware of it in many instances. To try to is overbearing and there's no way to adequately appease everyone, and you can try to be accommodating but it will likely just end up excluding someone. You can not mean malice or have any negative intention but still hurt people because you make light of something that is serious to them. But there is also value in trying to be inclusive and understanding others points of view.

My guess as to why they made the lips big like that vs what they tend to do on claymation or other stop motion shows is to make them more visible due to the small size of the bees on the screen. So they stand out. I posted the the pic of jesica rabbit to show other characters use big red lips. there are others. i further posted the black and white candy can character from an old cartoon i watched. Nothing about her character, to me, ever stood out to indicate a race. she's just a monster in a cartoon.

for the dude that shot up the church, he had mental issues. a lot of mental issues from what i remember reading. I'm not saying racism is dead, i just don't see it around almost every corner or in most things.

That's part of the rub too. Now, for a lot of people, being racist is being crazy, because they associate one with the other because usually these days the only blatantly racist people are typically also crazy. But it really isn't, although certainly a lot of over the top racism is paired with legitimate psychological issues, there's a lot of stuff, especially minor things (even subconscious ones) that is not. But people are trying to dismiss small discrimination because of it not being the blatant crazy level. To them, the smaller stuff is really no different to the bullshit that everyone has to put up with. Which isn't the case, and the reason why people that have to deal with that are angry is that they have to deal with both (the specific discrimination as well as the usual bullshit). And then they have people saying its their own faults, that making a fuss about small stuff makes it a bigger issue that negatively impacts more people. That's not entirely wrong, but it also is overly dismissive. You can both feel that it doesn't warrant your support but also not dismiss that it is an issue at all.

Its fine for you to not see the vestiges of racism that others do. You have likely had a very different life from them and so it won't carry the same weight. That doesn't make you racist for not getting offended, but that doesn't make people wrong for being bothered by it either.

Because it doesn't make sense. based on why some of you are saying it is offensive. I'm also just stating my thoughts on it and why i came to that conclusion. you're just saying i should be offended because of big red lips and how some raciest cartoons/characters have been drawn in the past. At least that's how i'm reading it.

Edit: and aside from how the lips look, is there ANYTHING else about it that offends you? if so, what and why?

No they're not. They're trying to explain to you why other people find it offensive. That does not mean you have to. But you acting like people are being wrong because "look at these other big red cartoon lips that people aren't decrying as racist" is why you're reading it wrong. There's nuance here that you're not getting. And that's even ok, and while I somewhat applaud you for trying to understand it, you also seem unwilling to accept why you don't understand it and that's really what makes all the difference.

Likewise, a point people have been trying to make for a while now is that, it doesn't even have to be intentional or mean-spirited. I've known people that are the nicest, most accommodating, and genuinely unbigoted people, that have used phrases that are blatantly racist because they didn't understand their origin or meaning. The look of horror on their faces (especially for instance if where they gained it was from a blatantly racist situation, like a beloved grandparent that used it as such, but as young kid they didn't understand) when explained just shows the intention matters, but that when the intention isn't clear. And that's part of why some stuff is contentious, as there's often little evidence of clear malice or is even being done deliberately for comedic shock value, and yes there absolutely are people that react as if it is all the same and I think that is wrong. Context and intent matters.

I don't see anything wrong with "Jews" is that not what they are called? Can replace that with any other thing like Christian or Catholic. Heck there is/was a hockey team called the saints, and it showed a cartoony angelic figure. I don't recall if it was just local or wider spread or if it even still exists, but it was not seen as derogatory at all.

I think "Chinaman" is considered a racist word though, or is it? If it just said Chinese it would probably be fine. Is referring to a place that serves Chinese food a "Chinese restaurant" considered racist?

Even though I take exception to a lot of the complaining about persecution by various religious people, I could see them taking exception to a company trying to commercialize something about them. The difference is, generally it doesn't seem to be done by a society that did horrendous things against them. But Saints and angelic figures are pretty broad and not really disparaging, nor does it grossly misrepresent them. So, sure that could be offensive, but its not anywhere near the same level.

Its less about the words (although intention matters, Jews and Chinamen are similar to Indian in that it isn't necessarily a derogatory word, but it can be used that way), and more about the ridiculous caricatures they're using for the logos. This should be exceedingly obvious. I'm not even trying to be a dick, you really do regularly completely miss major aspects of things and then formulate opinions on your weird skewed view of things. Sadly a lot of people seem to be similar and it makes people exceptionally easy to manipulate.
 
Back
Top