Well this sucks and I hate being right all the time. Ocean's heating waaay faster than thought.

[Paratus]

When the Scientific Consensus Is Corrected by a Skeptic


"Where did Lewis debunk the doomsayers? No, not in the esteemed pages of Nature but in a blog post at a website called Climate Etc., a small, dissenting dot in the vast universe of online science discussion. Lewis wrote: “The findings of the…paper were peer-reviewed and published in the world’s premier scientific journal and were given wide coverage in the English-speaking media.” He went on: “Despite this, a quick review of the first page of the paper was sufficient to raise doubts as to the accuracy of its results. Just a few hours of analysis and calculations, based only on published information, was sufficient to uncover apparently serious (but surely inadvertent) errors in the underlying calculations.”


https://www.commentarymagazine.com/...ientific-consensus-is-corrected-by-a-skeptic/

So which consensus do you think was overturned? Be specific.

 

[Greenman]

What do you suggest? You sound like the kind of person that would have a final solution to a population problem.

Over population is a problem that solves itself.