ran across this article on foxnews..... there's a website trying to get michael moore's oscar revoked...
Originally posted by: hdeck
michael moore is a no good tool but i could care less if they want take away his oscar
Originally posted by: XZeroII
I normally don't care about awards, but that REALLY upset me that he won one for that terrible work of fiction. It should definatly be taken away from him.
Well if you could muster all your evidence that Chicago does not in fact meet the most fundamental criteria to be considered a "broadway show" as it has been proven that Bowling For Columbine does not meet the most fundamental criteria to be legitimately considered a "documentary", then go for it.Originally posted by: Sid59
yeah whatever ..
i also believe Chicago should not of won an oscar being based on a broadway show. Maybe ill start an idiotic site asking for the oscar to be revoked.
Originally posted by: cmdavid
ran across this article on foxnews..... there's a website trying to get michael moore's oscar revoked...
Originally posted by: brxndxn
Oscars are a joke anyway. Yay, let's get the rich people together that don't really work and then pat each other on the back for it.
Originally posted by: Viper GTS
As much as I may dislike him, I have to say...
Meh, so what.
I honestly don't give a flying f*** about his Oscar.
Viper GTS
Originally posted by: tcsenter
Well if you could muster all your evidence that Chicago does not in fact meet the most fundamental criteria to be considered a "broadway show" as it has been proven that Bowling For Columbine does not meet the most fundamental criteria to be legitimately considered a "documentary", then go for it.Originally posted by: Sid59
yeah whatever ..
i also believe Chicago should not of won an oscar being based on a broadway show. Maybe ill start an idiotic site asking for the oscar to be revoked.
Personally, I don't think you have a case. Chicago is a broadway show. Bowling for Columbine, however, is no more of a documentary than "Spinal Tap".
Originally posted by: tcsenter
Well if you could muster all your evidence that Chicago does not in fact meet the most fundamental criteria to be considered a "broadway show" as it has been proven that Bowling For Columbine does not meet the most fundamental criteria to be legitimately considered a "documentary", then go for it.Originally posted by: Sid59
yeah whatever ..
i also believe Chicago should not of won an oscar being based on a broadway show. Maybe ill start an idiotic site asking for the oscar to be revoked.
Personally, I don't think you have a case. Chicago is a broadway show. Bowling for Columbine, however, is no more of a documentary than "Spinal Tap".
Originally posted by: AmdInside
I don't care that much about the speach he gave at the Oscar's. I know he is a dumba$$. He sounds like a dumba$$. I would expect people to know that he is a dumba$$. What bothers me is that he won the award on such a ficticious documentary.