ironcrotch
Diamond Member
- May 11, 2004
- 7,749
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: thegimp03
No. It's pretty damn disrespectful.
Originally posted by: So
Don't we have...you know...a war going on? Who cares about flip flops!?!?!?!
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: notfred
Originally posted by: thegimp03
No. It's pretty damn disrespectful.
Yeah, I'm deeply offended whenever I meet someone and they're wearing flip-flops. :roll:
Would you wear flip flops to a business meeting? Why would you wear them to meet the president of the United States?
Originally posted by: Amol
Originally posted by: HBalzer
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: HBalzer
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: HBalzer
1. Yes, many were caught when we invaded Afghanistan. Many have also been caught in Pakistan. Where's the big list of the ones we caught in Iraq?
-Saddam Hussein, Link
2. You can't be that dense. You think there is a limited supply of cheap explosives in the world, a limited amount of funding to buy them, or a limited supply of terrorists willing to use them? We don't even truly know how many resources the terrorists have. All it takes is a few people and a few pounds of explosives to wreak havoc on our society; according to most intelligence officials, the question isn't IF, but WHEN will they next attack us on our soil. And when they do, your argument for Iraq will go out the window, just like it did for the people in London.
-First you say ?You think there is a limited supply of cheap explosives in the world, a limited amount of funding to buy them, or a limited supply of terrorists willing to use them?? then you say ?We don't even truly know how many resources the terrorists have?
3. You're correct, but Saddam isn't the only leader who hates the US and we certainly aren't invading them.
-one at a time
Looks like you answered any questions we had about you in one reply. Thanks kiddo!
So basically you are saying i have to write some smart remark because i don't have an answer?
How can I reply to idiocy?
1) How is Saddam an al-Qaeda operative? If he was involved in terrorist acts against the US, where is the proof?
2) Was there even a reply in there? If you think hard enough maybe you would get it
3) I'm sure you have the full support of America and it's government behind you. BTW, when is the last time you visited a recruiting office?
I support the troops more than you can know without me having to kill you. Figure that one out.
Apparently you are good at replying with idiocy.
Apparently you are good at backing up your statements. :roll:
The September 11th Commission dismissed ANY collaborative relationship between al Qaeda and Iraq.
And "one at a time?" When was Saddam captured? December 2003? That was almost 20 months ago. If it took seven months to find Saddam, technically we should have caught 3 more leaders who hated the U.S.A.
*Editted for grammar and spelling.
Originally posted by: Anubis
how is this even news?
fvcking A some people need to get jobs and find something better to do then bitch about all this pointless sh!t
Agreed, flip flops are way too formal to wear to meet a man whose favorite food is probably fried... erm, 'frahhd' squirrel :laugh:Originally posted by: mugs
Would you wear flip flops to a business meeting? Why would you wear them to meet the president of the United States?
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
That's what is so beautiful about this country:
The people who thought it was disrespectful can bitch all they want.
The people who thought it was fine can bitch all they want.
In the end, we can logically conclude that as a matter of respect for the house and its place in society and history, the lacrosse players might have represented their organization in a better light, and yet we can equalyl conclude that their casual dress exemplified the open-ddor nature that the White House ocne had where anyone could visit the Home of the President of the United States, which is now, debatably, the msot powerful position in all of humanity.
God I love this country and its eccentric level of discourse![]()
haha very true :laugh:Originally posted by: rnp614
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: notfred
Originally posted by: thegimp03
No. It's pretty damn disrespectful.
Yeah, I'm deeply offended whenever I meet someone and they're wearing flip-flops. :roll:
Would you wear flip flops to a business meeting? Why would you wear them to meet the president of the United States?
I am a Northwestern Student am disappointed with the lack of forsight by those great athletes....BUT we have to remember that they are girl athletes...rather HE-SHEs that have almost no common sense. They dont know any better. So GIVE IT A BREAK!![]()
Originally posted by: mugs
It's about respect for the office, it's not about what's in it for you. I know we've become a lot more casual as a society, and decorum has gone out the window, but I think that if you're going to meet the president, you ought to not show up in beachwear. If you're just touring the white house, wear what you want. But meeting the president is supposed to be an honor, at least care enough to wear nicer sandals. If someone was giving me an award, I wouldn't wear sneakers.
Maybe these players took their shoe idea from Bush's daughter. If she can wear flip flops to court, then these lacross players can were them to the White House. I don't think a court room should be considered any less important than the white house when it comes to being properly dressed.Article
In 2001, Bush's daughter Jenna, then 19, wore black flip-flops in court, along with pink capri pants and a sleeveless black shirt, when she pleaded no contest to a misdemeanor charge of being a minor in possession of alcohol.
Originally posted by: TBone48
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
That's what is so beautiful about this country:
The people who thought it was disrespectful can bitch all they want.
The people who thought it was fine can bitch all they want.
In the end, we can logically conclude that as a matter of respect for the house and its place in society and history, the lacrosse players might have represented their organization in a better light, and yet we can equalyl conclude that their casual dress exemplified the open-ddor nature that the White House ocne had where anyone could visit the Home of the President of the United States, which is now, debatably, the msot powerful position in all of humanity.
God I love this country and its eccentric level of discourse![]()
That is quite an eloquent and incisive post. I don't think this topic could be summed up any more logically.:beer:
