Fjodor2001
Diamond Member
- Feb 6, 2010
- 4,507
- 714
- 126
Broadwell was the same. AMD and Intel have both kept quiet up until their product launches.
Yeah, I guess. But previously we at least had some leaks. Now they seem to have been silenced too...
Broadwell was the same. AMD and Intel have both kept quiet up until their product launches.
Why would this need spinning? Why would the public even care?
I just wonder how they'll promote Broadwell when Skylake is released. I think there can be a resistance among the public to buy a Broadwell CPU when Skylake is available, even if they do not have overlapping SKUs across all market segments. It's like buying a 2014 car model when the 2015 model is out, even if they just changed the tail lights...
Obviously Intel will promote Skylake as being better. But then where does that leave Broadwell? Do the OEMs want to put their Broadwell computer models on discount only 4 months after having been released?
First, if I understand correctly Broadwell is intended primarily as a mobile cpu, hence no k series. Skylake k series is shipping first I beleive.
Second, stop thinking retail. Think corporate where a company wants to buy the same systems for three years.
Third, so what if there's resistance against Broadwell! Intel gets the money if they buy Skylake.
Skylake will go into production and be on the shelves in 2H 2015. Think holiday season.
Broadwell will be the chip that handles most of 2014, including the back to school season.
Skylake-S is supposed to be on the shelves 2015Q2 last I heard...
Nope. OEMs asked Intel to delay it.
Interesting! Do you have confirmation that OEMs explicitly asked to delay? This makes sense , though.
Nope. OEMs asked Intel to delay it.
Skylake is just ~3-4 months away if we're to believe the latest info, and still nearly no details are known about it. No uarch or iGPU details from Intel at all. Not even any leaks about SKUs. What's up with that?![]()
It's a Tock, so there will be lots of CPU and GPU architectural changes to provide new functionality, features, power and performance improvements, but that doesn't tell anything about how those changes will affect benchmarks, though.
I do think eDRAM will become a bit more mainstream with Skylake.
I just wonder how they'll promote Broadwell when Skylake is released. I think there can be a resistance among the public to buy a Broadwell CPU when Skylake is available, even if they do not have overlapping SKUs across all market segments. It's like buying a 2014 car model when the 2015 model is out, even if they just changed the tail lights...
Obviously Intel will promote Skylake as being better. But then where does that leave Broadwell? Do the OEMs want to put their Broadwell computer models on discount only 4 months after having been released?
Phynaz
Good points, but Broadwell-K is planned. Public roadmaps don't say much about Skylake-K timing.
Because you are wrong. Skylake isn't coming before Q3 2015.
Again, any source on that Skylake-S is not coming until 2015Q3?
Source: CES @Intel.
![]()
Intel learned long ago, with the creation of their enthusiast -E platform and the staggered release schedules resulting thereafter, that having multiple architectures fielded at the same time does not cause the sort of market consternation or consumer trepidation that you are envisioning.
If technically savvy enthusiasts, about the only portion of consumers that would know an IB from a SB-E SKU, don't care that IB was out while they were busy buying up SB-E chips, then surely Intel has little to be concerned with when they are selling BW chips in laptops and SL chips in desktops to an even less technically literate consumer demographic.
Ok, I missed that. Does that mean all Skylake SKUs will be released in 2015H2?
Otherwise if we assume this is all that is known, Skylake might as well end up in a Broadwell-type situation. I.e. some very limited SKUs released in late 2015Q4, then a few more in 2016Q1 and the rest in 2016Q2.
Skylake was always targeted towards 2015. Like BK said in earnings call, it's just a new architecture that brings new capabilities, so it only makes sense to release it a soon as possible, which should be mid-'15 at Computex.
And Broadwell was targeted for 2014...
Also, it does not necessarily make sense to release Skylake ASAP, since the sales window for Broadwell will be too narrow.
Who cares if Broadwell sales are "too narrow"?
Who cares if Broadwell sales are "too narrow"?
