Was this scientist fired for finding a "4000 year-old" dinosaur fossil?

Page 7 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
72,333
32,876
136
What does the size of the dino shit you eat have to do with anything?

They were hundreds of times bigger than us, yet had the brain size of a golf ball, a single human with a tank could gun down an army of dinos, a child wielding a bazooka could take down there biggest species the brontosaurus, accoding to the size of their brains idealistically they were retarded giants bumping into things. Even if they existed tday on a remote island, a single nuke could wipe them out again, some ass kicking dinos they were. Huh
Yet the proto-lions would have been flies feeding on their dung.
 

Silver Prime

Golden Member
May 29, 2012
1,671
7
0
Poor dino relatives, killed by cats much smaller than them:


_46532671_ostrich_512.jpg


4946835946_92c093fe27.jpg


I'll just stick to the theory that the last of the dinos were in the ice age, and the mammals like the Carnivorians via pantheras like atrox, smilodon, fatalis ect killed off the last of them.


  • House cat > Chicken
  • Bobcat > Velociraptor
  • Leopard > Linthoraptor
  • Jaguar > Deinonychus (similar to jurassic parks)
  • Bengal tiger > Achillobator
  • African lion > Utharaptor
  • Coalition of lions > T rex
  • Herd of elephants > brontosaurus tripping the retarded bronto breaking his own neck.

Whats my evidence? There are no dinosaurs that made it through the ice age alive when the cave lions, cave bears and cave hyenas emerged out and took control of the land slaughtering the less intelligent reptiles.

Tangible proof:

gif-leopard-hunt-crocodile-898180.gif


Now go back to licking the dino shit off of the rocks you carbon date.
 
Last edited:

norseamd

Lifer
Dec 13, 2013
13,990
180
106
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/07/30...onist-beliefs/ Don't really know, to be honest, until more facts are released. But I don't think that he was let go simply because he was a "temporary employee" which so happened to take place days after his conclusions where published. You decide. What do you think?

I thought you said you believed that the evolutionary and historical model of the universe was correct?
 

norseamd

Lifer
Dec 13, 2013
13,990
180
106
It reports on the finding of soft tissue, which isn't even the first time this has been reported for a fossilized specimen.

Correct. There have been reporting of possible soft tissue of Tyrannosaurus Rex at least some years earlier.
 

norseamd

Lifer
Dec 13, 2013
13,990
180
106
He claimed the soft tissue supports his conclusion, though a physical explanation is simply "preferred".

No the existence of soft tissue does not support the theory that the universe or traditional dinosaurs is only some thousands of years old.
 

Silver Prime

Golden Member
May 29, 2012
1,671
7
0
They are dinosaurs dumbass. And how did Silver Prime end up in this thread out of all other discussions?

lol No they're not, they are relatives theres a difference, unless your fine with me calling you a monkey. Although that would suit your avitar and you going ape shit crazy with the multi post. lol
 

alzan

Diamond Member
May 21, 2003
3,860
2
0
knowledge...the study of something.

Again, its not like I agree with the guy, but even that newer one explains how easily people abuse the word science.

lets look at the facts:

  • The word Dinosuars has only been around for less than 2 centurys.
  • There are more than 10 cultures with their own artifacts of dinos/dragons before TV and Internet.
  • Carbon dating is not 100% accurate ergo roughly around this time, not exact.

Being as knowledgeable as you are you know that there are other methods of dating matter:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiometric_dating

Yes, dragons are fantastic and awesome creatures; when I sit down and play Dungeons and Dragons I'm able to suspend my disbelief and am able to imagine all kinds of things. It really helps make the game more real and satisfying. Griffons, hippogriffs, death knights and yes dragons and more come alive in my mind.

But when the gaming session is over I put my disbelief back in place and put my books and dice away.

Perhaps you should do the same.
 

Silver Prime

Golden Member
May 29, 2012
1,671
7
0
Being as knowledgeable as you are you know that there are other methods of dating matter:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiometric_dating

Yes, dragons are fantastic and awesome creatures; when I sit down and play Dungeons and Dragons I'm able to suspend my disbelief and am able to imagine all kinds of things. It really helps make the game more real and satisfying. Griffons, hippogriffs, death knights and yes dragons and more come alive in my mind.

But when the gaming session is over I put my disbelief back in place and put my books and dice away.

Perhaps you should do the same.

Hey if you dont wanna belive than thats your problem, you can stay in your D & D world if you like and play with your monkey friend dumbass above and do as you please.
 

alzan

Diamond Member
May 21, 2003
3,860
2
0
Hey if you dont wanna belive than thats your problem, you can stay in your D & D world if you like and play with your monkey friend dumbass above and do as you please.

Let me guess; you're posting in this thread to drive up your post count to convince yourself of how excellent a troll you are.

Glad I was able to help you.
 

Babbles

Diamond Member
Jan 4, 2001
8,253
14
81
There is religon in science, and there is science in religon...dont see why its been don'd two different catagories, there is also spiritual and athesiem, all 4 of these things can take place in each individuals swaying of Interpretation through out there lives many people convert back and forth, sounds just like man made inequalities.
. . .

I've been a 'professional' scientist since 1999 and there is a certain truthiness to that. I think there is a certain overlap between the two and there are groups of people on both sides that make a huge argument when there needs not be one.
 

Silver Prime

Golden Member
May 29, 2012
1,671
7
0
Let me guess; you're posting in this thread to drive up your post count to convince yourself of how excellent a troll you are.

Glad I was able to help you.

Nah, just was helpin the OP get a standing point that not only 1 person in the universe thinks dinos could have made it that far and that there is enough tangible proof that countless of cultures have documented dinos before your D and D had ever raped your weak sheeple mind.
 
Nov 25, 2013
32,083
11,718
136
Nah, just was helpin the OP get a standing point that not only 1 person in the universe thinks dinos could have made it that far and that there is enough tangible proof that countless of cultures have documented dinos before your D and D had ever raped your weak sheeple mind.

Uh oh. You said the 's' word. Now you get this:

wpid-sheeple-teapartywpbfl.jpg
 

Silver Prime

Golden Member
May 29, 2012
1,671
7
0
Uh oh. You said the 's' word. Now you get this:

wpid-sheeple-teapartywpbfl.jpg


Bingo, exactly what you are, following the heard of mindless drones who thinks you have the definitive answer. lol Atleast religon has cemented all historia and went through the trials and tribulations of preserving information ever since man has documented things, modern science wants to take credit for everything in existance with nothing but opinions and assumptions, its like ghostbusting...a contradiction to science.

Using there science technology to fight something they dont even belive in the first place.
 
Nov 25, 2013
32,083
11,718
136
Bingo, exactly what you are, following the heard of mindless drones who thinks you have the definitive answer. lol Atleast religon has cemented all historia and went through the trials and tribulations of preserving information ever since man has documented things, modern science wants to take credit for everything in existance with nothing but opinions and assumptions, its like ghostbusting...a contradiction to science.

Using there science technology to fight something they dont even belive in the first place.

English. Do you speak/write it?
 

Silver Prime

Golden Member
May 29, 2012
1,671
7
0
English. Do you speak/write it?


Is this coming from the guy who failed to explain science? The world is flat, flat, not flat, flat flat flat flat, not flat, not flat, maybe flat, oh okay not flat.

Ha hah ah ha, and theres your scieince in a nut shell. Science has useless fictional-scince things just the same as religon has mythological things as well. I dont see where you think you've proven...fucking anything. You're just being a condesending crybaby at this point.
 
Last edited:

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
29,453
29,865
136
Is this coming from the guy who failed to explain science? The world is flat, flat, not flat, flat flat flat flat, not flat, not flat, maybe flat, oh okay not flat.

Ha hah ah ha, and theres your scieince in a nut shell. Science has useless fictional-scince things just the same as religon has mythological things as well. I dont see where you think you've proven...fucking anything. You're just being a condesending crybaby at this point.

Stew is that you minus the you-tube links?
 
Dec 30, 2004
12,553
2
76
Why is that? What if he found one that was indeed 4000 years old? Should he suppress that work because it doesn't conform to accepted facts? Wouldn't it make more sense to look at his work and results and see if his results are accurate and reproducible?

I've heard countless stories of scientists let go 20 years ago because they were asking the wrong questions in light of new findings.

people have an agenda, assume you're crazy, and say because you're crazy, you're wrong.
very weak circular reasoning, very strong circular jerking