Originally posted by: Arkaign
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Capitalizt
Mccarthy was proven right...There were plenty of commies in US government. That doesn't excuse his behavior though.
Proof
and more proof
Both you, CAD, and the OP seem to be making this same mistake. That there were Soviet spies in US govt does not prove McCarthy right, as that aspect of the Red Scare was never really in dispute. There had already been a number of high profile cases and HUAC was already in full swing prior to McCarthy's arrival on the scene.
What McCarthy did was say that he knew who these Soviet spies were ("I have a list!" -- when he didn't) and then proceeded to ruin the lives of thousands of innocent Americans with unsubstantiated allegations and witch hunts. In the end, he probably did more the help the Soviet's espionage efforts than anything else.
So please, how was he proven "right" except by some kind of twisted revisionist history that incorrectly portrays him as the lone voice of alarm against the commie threat?
No, that is not correct. I did not say his list was correct or anything like that. He was correct that there were commies in the gov't and around the US - which is what I stated. But yes(as I've already stated) his tactics weren't the best. However, just because you, I and others don't like the tactics he used does not mean he wasn't right.
Mainly this boils down to what you think, I think he was right about and you seem to want to embellish what I stated into something more than what was said.
Yeah there's a balance. If you look historically, I don't think you'll find anyone who denies that during the cold war, the communist/Soviet spy threat to the US was a genuine danger to national security, and that there was a real need to meet this real threat with real action.
McCarthy stands out because of his silly antics and incredibly counterproductive actions. It was an intelligence issue to be dealt with by intelligence experts, not a blowhard politician with specious morals and standards. Counterintel relies upon a number of factors, a prime one being : Never let your enemy see you as weak. Running around screaming about 'reds' and witch-hunting people who have nothing to do with Communism for the sake of political expedience is the opposite of appearing strong, resolute, and competent. The KGB/GRU scoffed at the sheer stupidity of McCarthy, and his divisive tactics wasted a huge amount of energy and money in the process.
So I don't know what the point of this whole thing is. It boils down to several truths.
(1)- The USSR maintained massive global networks of spies, illegals, assets, etc.
(2)- The USA, being the 'prime adversary', received the bulk of Soviet Intel/Counterintel resources.
(3)- During McCarthy's era, it was undoubtedly true that there were many levels of Soviet infiltration at varying levels of US business, social, and government groups.
(4)- McCarthy's witch hunts and public spectacle produced a hugely negative result, he should have left the spy game to the experts.