seemingly random
Diamond Member
- Oct 10, 2007
- 5,277
- 0
- 0
Ok. You go first.Originally posted by: l0cke
Honestly, a small war might be better than them selling nukes and icbm's to every country with $5.
Ok. You go first.Originally posted by: l0cke
Honestly, a small war might be better than them selling nukes and icbm's to every country with $5.
Originally posted by: DanTMWTMP
Shit.. Why won't SK+USA do one MASSIVE preemptive attack? Something must be done to minimize damage to Seoul. It's as if war is inevitable, and diplomacy NEVER worked with NK, so why even try. I wish there is one huge invasion into NK to destroy most of the artillery pointed to Seoul, then just go on from there.
Originally posted by: DanTMWTMP
Shit.. Why won't SK+USA do one MASSIVE preemptive attack? Something must be done to minimize damage to Seoul. It's as if war is inevitable, and diplomacy NEVER worked with NK, so why even try. I wish there is one huge invasion into NK to destroy most of the artillery pointed to Seoul, then just go on from there.
Originally posted by: theflyingpig
I can't wait until the slaughter begins. War with North Korea will leave the land soaked in the blood of the innocent. You see, North Korea will not hesitate to wipe out entire regions, they have no mercy. Hopefully China will get involved. It would make things more interesting. I am quivering with excitement.
Originally posted by: DanTMWTMP
Shit.. Why won't SK+USA do one MASSIVE preemptive attack? Something must be done to minimize damage to Seoul. It's as if war is inevitable, and diplomacy NEVER worked with NK, so why even try. I wish there is one huge invasion into NK to destroy most of the artillery pointed to Seoul, then just go on from there.
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: theflyingpig
I can't wait until the slaughter begins. War with North Korea will leave the land soaked in the blood of the innocent. You see, North Korea will not hesitate to wipe out entire regions, they have no mercy. Hopefully China will get involved. It would make things more interesting. I am quivering with excitement.
Originally posted by: DanTMWTMP
Shit.. Why won't SK+USA do one MASSIVE preemptive attack? Something must be done to minimize damage to Seoul. It's as if war is inevitable, and diplomacy NEVER worked with NK, so why even try. I wish there is one huge invasion into NK to destroy most of the artillery pointed to Seoul, then just go on from there.
I am Korean (I know you are too Dan) so I am biased on this issue. But I did take a few Military Science classes in college, and in every War Game scenario with NK, at LEAST 1/3 of Seoul will become destroyed (even in the most optimal first strike scenario) due to its proximity to the border and the 13k artillery pieces deployed by NK at the border. I also believe they have a 1 million man army and 90k special ops (spec ops at the border).
I wonder if all this NK military activity has to do with the SK ex-president committing suicide and they are using it as an opportunity to see if they have an opening while the country is mourning and in slight disarray...
Originally posted by: theflyingpig
Originally posted by: DanTMWTMP
Shit.. Why won't SK+USA do one MASSIVE preemptive attack? Something must be done to minimize damage to Seoul. It's as if war is inevitable, and diplomacy NEVER worked with NK, so why even try. I wish there is one huge invasion into NK to destroy most of the artillery pointed to Seoul, then just go on from there.
Such an attack would be a wonderful thing. You see, in order for such an attack to be successful, a huge area of North Korea must be turned into a wasteland. Nothing must survive the initial onslaught. Everything must be destroyed. The North Koreans must understand that anything less than their complete and unconditional surrender will result in the annihilation of their entire homeland. Everyone knows this.
Originally posted by: Maximilian
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: theflyingpig
I can't wait until the slaughter begins. War with North Korea will leave the land soaked in the blood of the innocent. You see, North Korea will not hesitate to wipe out entire regions, they have no mercy. Hopefully China will get involved. It would make things more interesting. I am quivering with excitement.
Originally posted by: DanTMWTMP
Shit.. Why won't SK+USA do one MASSIVE preemptive attack? Something must be done to minimize damage to Seoul. It's as if war is inevitable, and diplomacy NEVER worked with NK, so why even try. I wish there is one huge invasion into NK to destroy most of the artillery pointed to Seoul, then just go on from there.
I am Korean (I know you are too Dan) so I am biased on this issue. But I did take a few Military Science classes in college, and in every War Game scenario with NK, at LEAST 1/3 of Seoul will become destroyed (even in the most optimal first strike scenario) due to its proximity to the border and the 13k artillery pieces deployed by NK at the border. I also believe they have a 1 million man army and 90k special ops (spec ops at the border).
I wonder if all this NK military activity has to do with the SK ex-president committing suicide and they are using it as an opportunity to see if they have an opening while the country is mourning and in slight disarray...
Evacuate seoul then strike, problem solved. Property can be replaced.
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: theflyingpig
I can't wait until the slaughter begins. War with North Korea will leave the land soaked in the blood of the innocent. You see, North Korea will not hesitate to wipe out entire regions, they have no mercy. Hopefully China will get involved. It would make things more interesting. I am quivering with excitement.
Originally posted by: DanTMWTMP
Shit.. Why won't SK+USA do one MASSIVE preemptive attack? Something must be done to minimize damage to Seoul. It's as if war is inevitable, and diplomacy NEVER worked with NK, so why even try. I wish there is one huge invasion into NK to destroy most of the artillery pointed to Seoul, then just go on from there.
I am Korean (I know you are too Dan) so I am biased on this issue. But I did take a few Military Science classes in college, and in every War Game scenario with NK, at LEAST 1/3 of Seoul will become destroyed (even in the most optimal first strike scenario) due to its proximity to the border and the 13k artillery pieces deployed by NK at the border. I also believe they have a 1 million man army and 90k special ops (spec ops at the border).
I wonder if all this NK military activity has to do with the SK ex-president committing suicide and they are using it as an opportunity to see if they have an opening while the country is mourning and in slight disarray...
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: Maximilian
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: theflyingpig
I can't wait until the slaughter begins. War with North Korea will leave the land soaked in the blood of the innocent. You see, North Korea will not hesitate to wipe out entire regions, they have no mercy. Hopefully China will get involved. It would make things more interesting. I am quivering with excitement.
Originally posted by: DanTMWTMP
Shit.. Why won't SK+USA do one MASSIVE preemptive attack? Something must be done to minimize damage to Seoul. It's as if war is inevitable, and diplomacy NEVER worked with NK, so why even try. I wish there is one huge invasion into NK to destroy most of the artillery pointed to Seoul, then just go on from there.
I am Korean (I know you are too Dan) so I am biased on this issue. But I did take a few Military Science classes in college, and in every War Game scenario with NK, at LEAST 1/3 of Seoul will become destroyed (even in the most optimal first strike scenario) due to its proximity to the border and the 13k artillery pieces deployed by NK at the border. I also believe they have a 1 million man army and 90k special ops (spec ops at the border).
I wonder if all this NK military activity has to do with the SK ex-president committing suicide and they are using it as an opportunity to see if they have an opening while the country is mourning and in slight disarray...
Evacuate seoul then strike, problem solved. Property can be replaced.
Do you know what the most Korean populated city is outside of Seoul? Los Angeles. EVERYONE lives in Seoul. That is impossible.
Originally posted by: DanTMWTMP
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: theflyingpig
I can't wait until the slaughter begins. War with North Korea will leave the land soaked in the blood of the innocent. You see, North Korea will not hesitate to wipe out entire regions, they have no mercy. Hopefully China will get involved. It would make things more interesting. I am quivering with excitement.
Originally posted by: DanTMWTMP
Shit.. Why won't SK+USA do one MASSIVE preemptive attack? Something must be done to minimize damage to Seoul. It's as if war is inevitable, and diplomacy NEVER worked with NK, so why even try. I wish there is one huge invasion into NK to destroy most of the artillery pointed to Seoul, then just go on from there.
I am Korean (I know you are too Dan) so I am biased on this issue. But I did take a few Military Science classes in college, and in every War Game scenario with NK, at LEAST 1/3 of Seoul will become destroyed (even in the most optimal first strike scenario) due to its proximity to the border and the 13k artillery pieces deployed by NK at the border. I also believe they have a 1 million man army and 90k special ops (spec ops at the border).
I wonder if all this NK military activity has to do with the SK ex-president committing suicide and they are using it as an opportunity to see if they have an opening while the country is mourning and in slight disarray...
ic. I sounded like a total ignorant idiot there. heh. But ya, any attack.. or any conflict, sounds like a huge lose-lose situation in the short term![]()
sigh..
Originally posted by: Maximilian
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: theflyingpig
I can't wait until the slaughter begins. War with North Korea will leave the land soaked in the blood of the innocent. You see, North Korea will not hesitate to wipe out entire regions, they have no mercy. Hopefully China will get involved. It would make things more interesting. I am quivering with excitement.
Originally posted by: DanTMWTMP
Shit.. Why won't SK+USA do one MASSIVE preemptive attack? Something must be done to minimize damage to Seoul. It's as if war is inevitable, and diplomacy NEVER worked with NK, so why even try. I wish there is one huge invasion into NK to destroy most of the artillery pointed to Seoul, then just go on from there.
I am Korean (I know you are too Dan) so I am biased on this issue. But I did take a few Military Science classes in college, and in every War Game scenario with NK, at LEAST 1/3 of Seoul will become destroyed (even in the most optimal first strike scenario) due to its proximity to the border and the 13k artillery pieces deployed by NK at the border. I also believe they have a 1 million man army and 90k special ops (spec ops at the border).
I wonder if all this NK military activity has to do with the SK ex-president committing suicide and they are using it as an opportunity to see if they have an opening while the country is mourning and in slight disarray...
Evacuate seoul then strike, problem solved. Property can be replaced.
Originally posted by: Maximilian
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: Maximilian
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: theflyingpig
I can't wait until the slaughter begins. War with North Korea will leave the land soaked in the blood of the innocent. You see, North Korea will not hesitate to wipe out entire regions, they have no mercy. Hopefully China will get involved. It would make things more interesting. I am quivering with excitement.
Originally posted by: DanTMWTMP
Shit.. Why won't SK+USA do one MASSIVE preemptive attack? Something must be done to minimize damage to Seoul. It's as if war is inevitable, and diplomacy NEVER worked with NK, so why even try. I wish there is one huge invasion into NK to destroy most of the artillery pointed to Seoul, then just go on from there.
I am Korean (I know you are too Dan) so I am biased on this issue. But I did take a few Military Science classes in college, and in every War Game scenario with NK, at LEAST 1/3 of Seoul will become destroyed (even in the most optimal first strike scenario) due to its proximity to the border and the 13k artillery pieces deployed by NK at the border. I also believe they have a 1 million man army and 90k special ops (spec ops at the border).
I wonder if all this NK military activity has to do with the SK ex-president committing suicide and they are using it as an opportunity to see if they have an opening while the country is mourning and in slight disarray...
Evacuate seoul then strike, problem solved. Property can be replaced.
Do you know what the most Korean populated city is outside of Seoul? Los Angeles. EVERYONE lives in Seoul. That is impossible.
Bleh not such a great situation thenAh well maybe technology will solve the problem in the long run, EMP bomb to disable the artillery etc. Of course by that time kim jong might well have died and n.korea sorted itself out.
