Originally posted by: Descartes
Originally posted by: Tommouse
Originally posted by: MetalMat
Originally posted by: Alone
Originally posted by: Tommouse
I except many many things in movies. But bending bullets?! Awww hellll no! The movie was garbage
Yet no one complained when Neo could stop bullets, or got up after being shot several times, or that he could fly, or jump into bodies. Right.
The whole point of the movie was to be unrealistic and sarcastic at that. The whole premises was built on this, that was the whole gimmick of the movie. That was the
point. It's not like it wasn't shown in the trailers...
Come on, are you really going to compare the matrix to this? lol, the matrix had an excuse cause it was all in a program and not in the real world dude.
He beat me to the reply, but he's right. The Matrix was a completely different world, defined by different rules. This movie was set in our world with our rules (physics) so it's not really an equal argument
Nothing is worse than people that argue about how scenes in movies aren't realistic. The overriding point here is that arguing about realism in movies is silly.
Do you complain about Die Hard? The Bourne movies? Bond? I really can't think of a single movie that is without some form of fantasy or suspension of physical law.
It's a movie. It's entertainment. If you want accuracy, watch the Science channel (and even they get it wrong sometimes).
[edit]Oh, and I thought the movie was worth a watch.[/edit]