Walmart's Project Impact: A Move to Crush Competition

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Engineer

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
39,230
701
126
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE

so, they took a risk, by selling foreign products, before everyone else, and that risk is now paying off... and we should hate them for it... right?

I hate them all for selling the Chinese made shit and helping to drive US manufacturing out.

I noted that I don't hate Walmart any more than I do the others for doing the same thing.

You think the US is better off manufacturing flip flops and plastic cups than inventing iPhone, the Google, etc?

So the people that were making the stuff at a decent wage are now inventing iPhones and Google? Bullshit. They are now working at Walmart....over 1% of the US workforce works the one company...the great paying Walmart.
 

miketheidiot

Lifer
Sep 3, 2004
11,060
1
0
Originally posted by: bamacre
Who cares if a lot of things are made in China? Generally there's nothing wrong with this. It's more efficient for us to buy things made in China, if they can make them more efficiently than we can. We can focus on producing things we can make more efficiently, and that means using ingenuity and technology rather than cheap labor. It's just stupid to try to produce every single thing we consume.

china manipulates is currency too be cheaper than it overwise should be. i'm surprised you aren't having an aneurysm over it
 

brandonbull

Diamond Member
May 3, 2005
6,365
1,223
126
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE

so, they took a risk, by selling foreign products, before everyone else, and that risk is now paying off... and we should hate them for it... right?

I hate them all for selling the Chinese made shit and helping to drive US manufacturing out.

I noted that I don't hate Walmart any more than I do the others for doing the same thing.

You think the US is better off manufacturing flip flops and plastic cups than inventing iPhone, the Google, etc?

So the people that were making the stuff at a decent wage are now inventing iPhones and Google? Bullshit. They are now working at Walmart....over 1% of the US workforce works the one company...the great paying Walmart.

Don't forget the great benefits.

 

JS80

Lifer
Oct 24, 2005
26,271
7
81
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE

so, they took a risk, by selling foreign products, before everyone else, and that risk is now paying off... and we should hate them for it... right?

I hate them all for selling the Chinese made shit and helping to drive US manufacturing out.

I noted that I don't hate Walmart any more than I do the others for doing the same thing.

You think the US is better off manufacturing flip flops and plastic cups than inventing iPhone, the Google, etc?

So the people that were making the stuff at a decent wage are now inventing iPhones and Google? Bullshit. They are now working at Walmart....over 1% of the US workforce works the one company...the great paying Walmart.

So you think the people working at Walmart are better off sewing clothes at a sweatshop?

Yes, the people that were in manufacturing are now working for Apple and the Googles. Kids these days don't have to go work at the plant after graduating high school. Now they go to college and get recruited to work for corporations.
 

brandonbull

Diamond Member
May 3, 2005
6,365
1,223
126
Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: bamacre
Who cares if a lot of things are made in China? Generally there's nothing wrong with this. It's more efficient for us to buy things made in China, if they can make them more efficiently than we can. We can focus on producing things we can make more efficiently, and that means using ingenuity and technology rather than cheap labor. It's just stupid to try to produce every single thing we consume.

I hate the Goddamn word "efficiency". Just use the real meaning of the word...cheap. They get paid $0.08 per hour is this "efficiency" that you guys refer to. Fuck that.

The US worker is the most productive worker in the world. Even with that, they cannot come close to competing with $0.08 per hour. The "efficiencies" that you mention have driven the folks out of the closing US factories, where they made a decent wave, into the stores of Walmart where they make shit wages. I guess it helps them afford the cheap stuff, especially since their incomes are so much lower now.

And for the record, this is not unique to just Walmart, however they were big in pushing and promoting it well before others finally gave in and did the same.

so, they took a risk, by selling foreign products, before everyone else, and that risk is now paying off... and we should hate them for it... right?

Until old man Walton left, WalMart very rarely purchased chinese junk.

 

Engineer

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
39,230
701
126
Originally posted by: JS80

So you think the people working at Walmart are better off sewing clothes at a sweatshop?

Yes, the people that were in manufacturing are now working for Apple and the Googles. Kids these days don't have to go work at the plant after graduating high school. Now they go to college and get recruited to work for corporations.

Have you been to a US manufacturing plant? I bet you've not so far as seen the outside of one much less being inside one. Sweatshop my ass. We're not talking about the foreign sweatshops that Walmart and other stores get their shit from. We're talking about quality US manufacturing jobs in decent plants and good working conditions + benefits.

Bullshit that the millions of folks that used to make stuff now work for Apple and Google. Those same folks now work for Walmart and other low paying jobs with little to no benefits just to make a living (and that's usually low enough they they get some of your and my tax money in form of EIC's and Medicaid).
 

Engineer

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
39,230
701
126
Originally posted by: brandonbull

Until old man Walton left, WalMart very rarely purchased chinese junk.

Walmart built their reputation and initial surge of being a rural department store and specialized with "Made In USA" stuff.
 

bamacre

Lifer
Jul 1, 2004
21,029
2
81
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: bamacre
Who cares if a lot of things are made in China? Generally there's nothing wrong with this. It's more efficient for us to buy things made in China, if they can make them more efficiently than we can. We can focus on producing things we can make more efficiently, and that means using ingenuity and technology rather than cheap labor. It's just stupid to try to produce every single thing we consume.

I hate the Goddamn word "efficiency". Just use the real meaning of the word...cheap. They get paid $0.08 per hour is this "efficiency" that you guys refer to. Fuck that.

The US worker is the most productive worker in the world. Even with that, they cannot come close to competing with $0.08 per hour.

Efficiency doesn't necessarily mean "cheap." Just means making good use of the resources you have. Go check out FedEx's operations, or WalMart's, specifically their use of logistics. Using their brains instead of their brawn. NewEgg has a machine that makes boxes. Hell, microprocessors.

Like I said, the brawn of the people that used to make that stuff in US factories is now being utilized in the Walmart stores (and others like it) that sell that shit.

You know damn good and well that "efficient", when it comes to Chinese made stuff, means CHEAP (labor).

Sure, I will agree with that. If that's what they want, so be it. I wouldn't want half of this country's citizens working in the same manner.
 

bamacre

Lifer
Jul 1, 2004
21,029
2
81
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: bamacre
Who cares if a lot of things are made in China? Generally there's nothing wrong with this. It's more efficient for us to buy things made in China, if they can make them more efficiently than we can. We can focus on producing things we can make more efficiently, and that means using ingenuity and technology rather than cheap labor. It's just stupid to try to produce every single thing we consume.

china manipulates is currency too be cheaper than it overwise should be. i'm surprised you aren't having an aneurysm over it

Why should I care? I'm not a citizen of China.
 

CrackRabbit

Lifer
Mar 30, 2001
16,642
62
91
Have any of you been in a K-mart, Rite-Aid or Toys R' Us recently?
They are the cause of their own problems, the stores are outdated, disorganized, generally dirty and staffed by people that don't care to improve any of it.

The Rite-Aid I used to live close to hadn't been remodeled since the late seventies and still used POS equipment from when Ronald Reagan was still in office. The merchandise didn't make much sense (who goes to a pharmacy to buy a crap vacuum cleaner or pots and pans?), and the store had a yellow dinginess to everything.
The only reason I ever went in there was because it was next to the laundromat where I washed my clothes and I could get a cold drink there when the coolers weren't broken.
How is any of that Wal-Mart's fault?
 

Darwin333

Lifer
Dec 11, 2006
19,946
2,330
126
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: JS80

So you think the people working at Walmart are better off sewing clothes at a sweatshop?

Yes, the people that were in manufacturing are now working for Apple and the Googles. Kids these days don't have to go work at the plant after graduating high school. Now they go to college and get recruited to work for corporations.

Have you been to a US manufacturing plant? I bet you've not so far as seen the outside of one much less being inside one. Sweatshop my ass. We're not talking about the foreign sweatshops that Walmart and other stores get their shit from. We're talking about quality US manufacturing jobs in decent plants and good working conditions + benefits.

Bullshit that the millions of folks that used to make stuff now work for Apple and Google. Those same folks now work for Walmart and other low paying jobs with little to no benefits just to make a living (and that's usually low enough they they get some of your and my tax money in form of EIC's and Medicaid).

The problem is how do you convince Americans to pay more for their "stuff"? People bitch about outsourcing all day long but most will gladly buy a Chinese made shirt if its a buck cheaper. Walmart is not the problem, the problem is the consumer.

Just wait until the Chinese start selling us cars. WE will gladly run the remainder of our auto sector out of business to save a few bucks.

I agree with you on what the problem is, unfortunately I have no good or feasible ideas on how to fix it.
 

Engineer

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
39,230
701
126
Originally posted by: Darwin333
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: JS80

So you think the people working at Walmart are better off sewing clothes at a sweatshop?

Yes, the people that were in manufacturing are now working for Apple and the Googles. Kids these days don't have to go work at the plant after graduating high school. Now they go to college and get recruited to work for corporations.

Have you been to a US manufacturing plant? I bet you've not so far as seen the outside of one much less being inside one. Sweatshop my ass. We're not talking about the foreign sweatshops that Walmart and other stores get their shit from. We're talking about quality US manufacturing jobs in decent plants and good working conditions + benefits.

Bullshit that the millions of folks that used to make stuff now work for Apple and Google. Those same folks now work for Walmart and other low paying jobs with little to no benefits just to make a living (and that's usually low enough they they get some of your and my tax money in form of EIC's and Medicaid).

The problem is how do you convince Americans to pay more for their "stuff"? People bitch about outsourcing all day long but most will gladly buy a Chinese made shirt if its a buck cheaper. Walmart is not the problem, the problem is the consumer.

Just wait until the Chinese start selling us cars. WE will gladly run the remainder of our auto sector out of business to save a few bucks.

I agree with you on what the problem is, unfortunately I have no good or feasible ideas on how to fix it.

You're right, you can't. They cut their nose off spite their face. Not realizing that they are the very reason that their own pay isn't advancing at a faster pace (if at all after inflation). We will become a nation of people selling cheap shit to each other. I guess it will work OK as long as we can keep the printing presses going and the rest of the world taking our paper for their plastic.

I find it amusing that most people think that offshoring manufacturing only removes low paying operator jobs. That's so far from the truth, it isn't funny (I've seen it first hand for nearly a decade as hundreds if not thousands of skilled trade workers as well as college educated alike (engineers, managers, quality personnel, designers, research, etc) are displaced as the factories move offhsore (not to mention the tax base that those factories take with them).
 

Strk

Lifer
Nov 23, 2003
10,197
4
76
Originally posted by: CPA
So let me get this straight. These items:

PS3, XBox360, Nintendo Video games
Apple Ipods
Black & Decker tools and appliances
Spalding and Wilson Sporting Goods
All food products
Mars Candy
Huffy Bikes
Glidden Paint
HHT Pool chemicals
Iams Dog Food
Purina Cat Food
Gillette Razors
Nature's Way Vitamins
Bridgestone Tires
and on and on and on

are somehow different than what other stores sells in that these items are made in China for Walmart, while they are made in the USA for the other stores?

I'm not arguing they're not made in China, but it would be made in China no matter what store sold them. Stores like Target, Kohl's, Meijers, Costco, Gamestop, Vitamin World.

Technically, WalMart is known for making manufacturers "adjust" how things are made to make them cheaper. Product quality may often be sacrificed to get it sold at WalMart.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: Strk
Originally posted by: CPA
So let me get this straight. These items:

PS3, XBox360, Nintendo Video games
Apple Ipods
Black & Decker tools and appliances
Spalding and Wilson Sporting Goods
All food products
Mars Candy
Huffy Bikes
Glidden Paint
HHT Pool chemicals
Iams Dog Food
Purina Cat Food
Gillette Razors
Nature's Way Vitamins
Bridgestone Tires
and on and on and on

are somehow different than what other stores sells in that these items are made in China for Walmart, while they are made in the USA for the other stores?

I'm not arguing they're not made in China, but it would be made in China no matter what store sold them. Stores like Target, Kohl's, Meijers, Costco, Gamestop, Vitamin World.

Technically, WalMart is known for making manufacturers "adjust" how things are made to make them cheaper. Product quality may often be sacrificed to get it sold at WalMart.

ok. do those products ONLY get sold at walmart or do they ship them off to Target, Kmart etc?

 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,359
126
Originally posted by: Strk
Originally posted by: CPA
So let me get this straight. These items:

PS3, XBox360, Nintendo Video games
Apple Ipods
Black & Decker tools and appliances
Spalding and Wilson Sporting Goods
All food products
Mars Candy
Huffy Bikes
Glidden Paint
HHT Pool chemicals
Iams Dog Food
Purina Cat Food
Gillette Razors
Nature's Way Vitamins
Bridgestone Tires
and on and on and on

are somehow different than what other stores sells in that these items are made in China for Walmart, while they are made in the USA for the other stores?

I'm not arguing they're not made in China, but it would be made in China no matter what store sold them. Stores like Target, Kohl's, Meijers, Costco, Gamestop, Vitamin World.

Technically, WalMart is known for making manufacturers "adjust" how things are made to make them cheaper. Product quality may often be sacrificed to get it sold at WalMart.

Really? Can you give a name brand example of two products, with different manufacturing standards?
 

spittledip

Diamond Member
Apr 23, 2005
4,480
1
81
Originally posted by: brandonbull
Originally posted by: JS80
Walmart is helping poor people by lowering prices and removing inefficiencies and people are complaining.

Because they get tons of tax credits and buy nothing but junk from China. Sounds like they are helping poor people of China.

So the poor of China don't deserve our help?

I kid.
 

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,948
126
Originally posted by: Zeppelin2282
($8 jeans!)

:confused: Sweat shop crap. I only buy Japanese selvedge denim. The workers make between $14 and $20 an hour.
 

Modelworks

Lifer
Feb 22, 2007
16,240
7
76
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: Modelworks
Walmart sells a lot of junk. I don't shop there anymore after seeing what they have done to manufacturers to get them to sell their products.

Not entirely true. Have you seen their products online? Hell you can buy Antec cases from WalMart!

And this whole "sells Chinese junk" argument is bullsht. So does Fred Meyer, KMart, etc. Its no different.

It is different because Walmart uses their size to bully manufacturers. It is very similar to how the mob worked in the 1920's. Ours is the only store in this community, if you want to succeed you sell at our price or fail. The walmart slogan is well known by manufacturers "keep the lowest price at any cost", not at all like the founder wanted. Read up on what happened with Levi Strauss. Levi could not keep up with the demand from walmart to lower prices and stay a USA company, so they sold out and thousands of Americans lost jobs. Now Levi is a joke brand, it isn't quality anymore.

When you sign a contract with walmart you agree to sell to them 5% cheaper every year. Many companies cannot do that and keep quality high. I have to commend Snapper mowers. They were sold at walmart, but when walmart told them to lower the quality of the product so walmart could sell it cheaper, Snapper refused and ended the contract.

about walmart:
On basic products that don't change, the price Wal-Mart will pay, and will charge shoppers, must drop year after year. But what almost no one outside the world of Wal-Mart and its 21,000 suppliers knows is the high cost of those low prices. Wal-Mart has the power to squeeze profit-killing concessions from vendors. To survive in the face of its pricing demands, makers of everything from bras to bicycles to blue jeans have had to lay off employees and close U.S. plants in favor of outsourcing products from overseas.


Wal-Mart, which in the late 1980s and early 1990s trumpeted its claim to "Buy American," has doubled its imports from China in the past five years alone, buying some $12 billion in merchandise in 2002. That's nearly 10% of all Chinese exports to the United States.

Carolina Mills, a 75-year-old North Carolina company that supplies thread, yarn, and textile finishing to apparel makers--half of which supply Wal-Mart. Carolina Mills grew steadily until 2000. But in the past three years, as its customers have gone either overseas or out of business, it has shrunk from 17 factories to 7, and from 2,600 employees to 1,200. Dobbins's customers have begun to face imported clothing sold so cheaply to Wal-Mart that they could not compete even if they paid their workers nothing.

Vlasic pickles - And so Vlasic's gallon jar of pickles went into every Wal-Mart, some 3,000 stores, at $2.97, a price so low that Vlasic and Wal-Mart were making only a penny or two on a jar, if that. Vlasic filed for bankruptcy in January 2001.

Nabisco - John Fitzgerald, a former vice president of Nabisco, remembers Wal-Mart's reaction to his company's plan to offer a 25-cent newspaper coupon for a large bag of Lifesavers in advance of Halloween. Wal-Mart told Nabisco to add up what it would spend on the promotion--for the newspaper ads, the coupons, and handling--and then just take that amount off the price instead. "That isn't necessarily good for the manufacturer," Fitzgerald says. "They need things that draw attention."

Wal-Mart will say, 'Here's the price you gave me last year. Here's what I can get a competitor's product for. Here's what I can get a private-label version for. I want to see a better value that I can bring to my shopper this year. Or else I'm going to use that shelf space differently.' "

Carey has a friend in the umbrella business who learned that. One year, because of costs, he went to Wal-Mart and asked for a 5% price increase. "Wal-Mart said, 'We were expecting a 5% decrease. We're off by 10%. Go back and sharpen your pencil.' " The umbrella man scrimped and came back with a 2% increase. "They said, 'We'll go with a Chinese manufacturer'--and he was out entirely."


If Wal-Mart doesn't like the pricing on something, says Andrew Whitman, who helped service Wal-Mart for years when he worked at General Foods and Kraft, they simply say, "At that price we no longer think it's a good value to our shopper. Therefore, we don't think we should carry it."

Masterlock -In January 1997, Master Lock announced that, after 75 years making locks in Milwaukee, it would begin importing more products from Asia. Not too long after, Master Lock opened a factory of its own in Nogales, Mexico. Today, it makes just 10% to 15% of its locks in Milwaukee--its 300 employees there mostly make parts that are sent to Nogales, where there are now 800 factory workers.


You can say that kmart, target ,etc all do the same thing, but the difference is how they do it. It is one thing to choose manufacturers who want to sell at one price, it is another thing entirely if you force the manufacturer to sell at a price . Many cities only have walmart as the main retailer. If walmart tells a manufacturer, lower your price or you can't sell in this city, how is that not mob like tactics ?

 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
81
Originally posted by: Zeppelin2282
http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/2...us_time/08599192069800

Walmart loves to shock and awe. City-size stores, absurdly low prices ($8 jeans!) and everything from milk to Matchbox toys on its shelves. And with the recession forcing legions of stores into bankruptcy, the world's largest retailer now apparently wants to take out the remaining survivors.

Thus, the company is in the beginning stages of a massive store and strategy remodeling effort, which it has dubbed Project Impact. One goal of Project Impact is cleaner, less cluttered stores that will improve the shopping experience. Another is friendlier customer service. A third: home in on categories where the competition can be killed. "They've got Kmart ready to take a standing eight-count next year," says retail consultant Burt Flickinger III, managing director for Strategic Resources Group and a veteran Walmart watcher. "Same with Rite Aid. They've knocked out four of the top five toy retailers, and are now going after the last one standing, Toys "R" Us. Project Impact will be the catalyst to wipe out a second round of national and regional retailers."



I refuse to ever shop there...but one of these days that might not be an option.

walmart has the lowest prices for commodity stuff (automotive oil, duck tape yade yada). I'm a rational consumer and shop at the lowest price retailer :)
 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
81
Originally posted by: JS80
Walmart is helping poor people by lowering prices and removing inefficiencies and people are complaining.

Yeah but they keep a spread from the chinese made stuff, so it's arguably a net loss for consumers.

If I can replace a US made widget with a cost of $1 ($1.5 retail) by a chinese made widget with a cost of $0.3, I can now sell it for $1 (lower price) AND increase my margin by 20c.

So the cost if borne by the worker/consumer by losing jobs etc. and the benefit is borne by both consumer/worker and walmart. When you net it out, consumer/worker loses and walmart wins.

It's still more efficient to manufacture things there, but the above is an argument for unionizing and/or similar practices in companies that benefit from free trade. Otherwise you're looking a wealth transfer.
 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,359
126
Originally posted by: Modelworks
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: Modelworks
Walmart sells a lot of junk. I don't shop there anymore after seeing what they have done to manufacturers to get them to sell their products.

Not entirely true. Have you seen their products online? Hell you can buy Antec cases from WalMart!

And this whole "sells Chinese junk" argument is bullsht. So does Fred Meyer, KMart, etc. Its no different.

It is different because Walmart uses their size to bully manufacturers. It is very similar to how the mob worked in the 1920's. Ours is the only store in this community, if you want to succeed you sell at our price or fail. The walmart slogan is well known by manufacturers "keep the lowest price at any cost", not at all like the founder wanted. Read up on what happened with Levi Strauss. Levi could not keep up with the demand from walmart to lower prices and stay a USA company, so they sold out and thousands of Americans lost jobs. Now Levi is a joke brand, it isn't quality anymore.

Model, are you suggesting the "buy in bulk and pay less per unit" concept is...bullying?
 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
81
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: Modelworks
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: Modelworks
Walmart sells a lot of junk. I don't shop there anymore after seeing what they have done to manufacturers to get them to sell their products.

Not entirely true. Have you seen their products online? Hell you can buy Antec cases from WalMart!

And this whole "sells Chinese junk" argument is bullsht. So does Fred Meyer, KMart, etc. Its no different.

It is different because Walmart uses their size to bully manufacturers. It is very similar to how the mob worked in the 1920's. Ours is the only store in this community, if you want to succeed you sell at our price or fail. The walmart slogan is well known by manufacturers "keep the lowest price at any cost", not at all like the founder wanted. Read up on what happened with Levi Strauss. Levi could not keep up with the demand from walmart to lower prices and stay a USA company, so they sold out and thousands of Americans lost jobs. Now Levi is a joke brand, it isn't quality anymore.

Model, are you suggesting the "buy in bulk and pay less per unit" concept is...bullying?

It's moreso the issue of putting pressure on suppliers to move to LCM countries. CNBC had a good special on walmart and one of the former supplier was talking about his experience and how the walmart reps constantly dropped hints and suggestions that he should move his mfr. base.
 

MovingTarget

Diamond Member
Jun 22, 2003
9,002
115
106
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE

so, they took a risk, by selling foreign products, before everyone else, and that risk is now paying off... and we should hate them for it... right?

I hate them all for selling the Chinese made shit and helping to drive US manufacturing out.

I noted that I don't hate Walmart any more than I do the others for doing the same thing.

You think the US is better off manufacturing flip flops and plastic cups than inventing iPhone, the Google, etc?

So the people that were making the stuff at a decent wage are now inventing iPhones and Google? Bullshit. They are now working at Walmart....over 1% of the US workforce works the one company...the great paying Walmart.

So you think the people working at Walmart are better off sewing clothes at a sweatshop?

Coming from a state that was once heavy into the textile industry, the answer is a resounding YES. The conditions, pay, and benefits were much better at the factories than at walmart.
 

bctbct

Diamond Member
Dec 22, 2005
4,868
1
0
Sept 9, 2009

Wal-Mart will settle the lawsuit brought by 116,000 California workers who won a landmark $172 million judgment against the company in 2005 for illegally denying them meal breaks.

In its quarterly report filed Wednesday, the world's largest retailer revealed that it had agreed July 13 to settle the class-action lawsuit led by prominent Sonoma County attorney Fred Furth.

The suit, Savaglio v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., accused the company of denying its workers meal and rest breaks.

State law require employers to provide an unpaid 30-minute meal break after five hours of work, and a second such break if the employee works more than 10 hours per day.

?I think it sends a message that Wal-Mart wants to get these kinds of practices behind them,? Furth said. ?I think it also sends a message to other companies that the law on meal breaks is a serious law.?

Wal-Mart officials could not be reached for comment Wednesday.

An Alameda County Superior Court jury in 2005 ordered the company to pay $57 million in general damages and $115 million in punitive damages following a three-month trial. The company appealed.

In July, Wal-Mart agreed to pay between $77 million and $152 million, depending on the number of current and former workers who step forward. The settlement is ?probably the largest employment lawsuit settlement in history,? Furth said.


Text
 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,359
126
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: Modelworks
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: Modelworks
Walmart sells a lot of junk. I don't shop there anymore after seeing what they have done to manufacturers to get them to sell their products.

Not entirely true. Have you seen their products online? Hell you can buy Antec cases from WalMart!

And this whole "sells Chinese junk" argument is bullsht. So does Fred Meyer, KMart, etc. Its no different.

It is different because Walmart uses their size to bully manufacturers. It is very similar to how the mob worked in the 1920's. Ours is the only store in this community, if you want to succeed you sell at our price or fail. The walmart slogan is well known by manufacturers "keep the lowest price at any cost", not at all like the founder wanted. Read up on what happened with Levi Strauss. Levi could not keep up with the demand from walmart to lower prices and stay a USA company, so they sold out and thousands of Americans lost jobs. Now Levi is a joke brand, it isn't quality anymore.

Model, are you suggesting the "buy in bulk and pay less per unit" concept is...bullying?

It's moreso the issue of putting pressure on suppliers to move to LCM countries. CNBC had a good special on walmart and one of the former supplier was talking about his experience and how the walmart reps constantly dropped hints and suggestions that he should move his mfr. base.

Well, here's my view. And maybe its simplistic. Like it or not, we are in a world economy now. If I manufactured widgets at a cost of $2.00, and a company like WalMart approached me and suggested I move operations, I would look into it. If I found I could have the same widget made in Mexico for a net cost of $1.65, added to a contract from the largest retailer in the world to market my widget, you bet your ass I would do it.