Walmart vs Hercules

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
Originally posted by: TheBeast
Ok, so I've seen several people here mention how "good" Costco is because of their pay and benefits. Could someone please provide "proof" of how "good" the benefits package is vs. just saying that it is good?
Check it out
 

TheBeast

Senior member
Oct 10, 1999
581
0
0
you call that proof? I mean, how much does costco (or Target, mom and pop) spend on its employees (fringe rate) vs. Wal-Mart. ?

There is also nothing on that list that walmart doesn't provide as well.

In a particular area, what do wages look like at WM vs. Costco, Target Mom and Pop?
 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
Why do I have to do your research for you?

Business Week Online

Look at how Costco pulls it off. Although Sam's $11.52 hourly average wage for full-timers tops the $9.64 earned by a typical Wal-Mart worker, it's still nearly 40% less than Costco's $15.97. Costco also shells out thousands more a year for workers' health and retirement and includes more of them in its health care, 401(k), and profit-sharing plans. "They take a very pro-employee attitude," says Rome Aloise, chief Costco negotiator for the Teamsters, which represents 14,000 Costco workers.

So let's re-cap: Costco workers make 40% more than Wal-Mart workers. Costco shells out thousands of $ more per year for beneifts. WTF more do you want to know? Go compare your benefits to the Costco benefits package I linked above.
 

TheBeast

Senior member
Oct 10, 1999
581
0
0
LOL! The source of the info .... teamsters .... hmmm nice unbiased source.

Do the wage numbers include all Sam's and All Costco? I think it would be a little more accurate to look at Costco vs. Sams in a particular region (since Sam's is much larger than costco and employs more people in more areas, likely driving that average wage figure lower).

Costco also shells out thousands more a year for workers' health and retirement and includes more of them in its health care, 401(k), and profit-sharing plans

That is a great statement. Where's the beef? Words without proof are just rhetoric.

Go compare your benefits to the Costco benefits package I linked above.

I already did, there's nothing costco does that WM doesn't.



 
May 28, 2006
149
0
0
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Starbuck1975
No it's Wally World getting their asses handed to them imminently.
That you gain satisfaction from the potential screwing over of a corporation is disturbing...capitalism and a highly efficient business model is what made Wallmart successful.

Regardless, this is hardly a pebble in the road for Walmart...let the town of Hercules have its victory...Walmart can just build another store the next town over, that I am sure some of these residents will end up shopping at once they smell the sweet aroma of rock bottom prices.

Originally posted by: Genx87
I dont like my neighbor, think I will get the city to kick the bum out by taking his property.

This will fail in the court system and rightly so unless they can provide a reason for the city taking the land for public use.

On top of that these small business owners must not have faith in their fellow citizen to not buy from Walmart and are using the strong arm of the govt to supress the free market.

I find it funny so many spoke out against Walmart when you know they would be the first in line to get the best deal.

True Americans recognize that "rock bottom prices" and the "best deal" doesn't have to mean selling America out.

Hopefully you America haters will continue to lose.

That is a load of horseshit and you know it. True Americans dont believe the govt is an oppressive machine they can craft to weed out who they dont want.

What next, these guys pass laws or ordinances outlawing blacks and hispanics and taking their land?
Is that what a "true" American would want? Or some sick fascist or socialist who believes the govt is their god

What are you raving about. This was the will of the people acting through their elected representatives acting through the government. We are the government. This is provided for in the Constitution.

Stealing private property for non-public use is provided for in the constitution?
This is news to me?

Correct, you are uniformed. The taking of private land for public use is provided for in the constitution.

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment05/14.html

Perhaps you could help me understand your position...do you put the interests of Walmart over the constitutional and democratically expressed right of US citizens to determine what is built in their town?

Corporatism isn't libertarianism.
 

Stunt

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2002
9,717
2
0
Stupid question...

If the vast majority of people don't want Walmart in their city, wouldn't building the store hurt Walmart more? I mean investing all that money putting the store up, stocking it and training people...then having nobody shop there?

Of course the smaller businesses are going to be against more competition because the consumer has more power over the products they buy than the store owners do.

Let them build the Walmart, if *most* people don't want it there, then people will make that desicion for themselves. Why do these grandstanding idiots feel they know what's best for me?

Besides...do you guys have proof the small business owners give benefits and high wages to their employees? In my experience they use student labour (less than minimum wage).
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,744
6,761
126
Originally posted by: Stunt
Stupid question...

If the vast majority of people don't want Walmart in their city, wouldn't building the store hurt Walmart more? I mean investing all that money putting the store up, stocking it and training people...then having nobody shop there?

Of course the smaller businesses are going to be against more competition because the consumer has more power over the products they buy than the store owners do.

Let them build the Walmart, if *most* people don't want it there, then people will make that desicion for themselves. Why do these grandstanding idiots feel they know what's best for me?

Besides...do you guys have proof the small business owners give benefits and high wages to their employees? In my experience they use student labour (less than minimum wage).

No, you are the idiot. They have determined what is best for them and what is best for you only if you live there. This is democracy in action through the legislature at the city level. You don't like it, move or get enough people to vote to change what is the popular wish. Basically it's you who thinks like a Nazi because it's you who has the elite notion that what you want should be the rule. Try not to be so sociopath and immature. The city drew up careful plans with a 60000 sq foot max and WalGod thinks they have a divine right to make it 100000 because that suite them. The city said no, offered to take the property back, but WalScum thinks they can tell Hercules where to go.
 

Stunt

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2002
9,717
2
0
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: Stunt
Stupid question...

If the vast majority of people don't want Walmart in their city, wouldn't building the store hurt Walmart more? I mean investing all that money putting the store up, stocking it and training people...then having nobody shop there?

Of course the smaller businesses are going to be against more competition because the consumer has more power over the products they buy than the store owners do.

Let them build the Walmart, if *most* people don't want it there, then people will make that desicion for themselves. Why do these grandstanding idiots feel they know what's best for me?

Besides...do you guys have proof the small business owners give benefits and high wages to their employees? In my experience they use student labour (less than minimum wage).
No, you are the idiot. They have determined what is best for them and what is best for you only if you live there. This is democracy in action through the legislature at the city level. You don't like it, move or get enough people to vote to change what is the popular wish. Basically it's you who thinks like a Nazi because it's you who has the elite notion that what you want should be the rule. Try not to be so sociopath and immature. The city drew up careful plans with a 60000 sq foot max and WalGod thinks they have a divine right to make it 100000 because that suite them. The city said no, offered to take the property back, but WalScum thinks they can tell Hercules where to go.
A small number of "City Council" members do not know what is best for everybody. They are likely biased from the small business owners who do not feel they can differentiate their products or services enough to compete. This is no different than a small number of politicians on capital hill listening to big-tobacco or big-pharma. The only way to know how people really feel is giving them the choice, not getting a few politicans together to decide :p

I am not a "Nazi", I advocate freedom, choice and liberty...you feel our choices should be made for us by city council. The property issue you are completely correct, just the decision not to let walmart into the community is wrong.
 

1EZduzit

Lifer
Feb 4, 2002
11,833
1
0
Originally posted by: Stunt
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: Stunt
Stupid question...

If the vast majority of people don't want Walmart in their city, wouldn't building the store hurt Walmart more? I mean investing all that money putting the store up, stocking it and training people...then having nobody shop there?

Of course the smaller businesses are going to be against more competition because the consumer has more power over the products they buy than the store owners do.

Let them build the Walmart, if *most* people don't want it there, then people will make that desicion for themselves. Why do these grandstanding idiots feel they know what's best for me?

Besides...do you guys have proof the small business owners give benefits and high wages to their employees? In my experience they use student labour (less than minimum wage).
No, you are the idiot. They have determined what is best for them and what is best for you only if you live there. This is democracy in action through the legislature at the city level. You don't like it, move or get enough people to vote to change what is the popular wish. Basically it's you who thinks like a Nazi because it's you who has the elite notion that what you want should be the rule. Try not to be so sociopath and immature. The city drew up careful plans with a 60000 sq foot max and WalGod thinks they have a divine right to make it 100000 because that suite them. The city said no, offered to take the property back, but WalScum thinks they can tell Hercules where to go.
A small number of "City Council" members do not know what is best for everybody. They are likely biased from the small business owners who do not feel they can differentiate their products or services enough to compete. This is no different than a small number of politicians on capital hill listening to big-tobacco or big-pharma. The only way to know how people really feel is giving them the choice, not getting a few politicans together to decide :p

I am not a "Nazi", I advocate freedom, choice and liberty...you feel our choices should be made for us by city council. The property issue you are completely correct, just the decision not to let walmart into the community is wrong.

Too bad for Walmart. I'm sure they have some big guns behind them, but they are subject to the laws just like the rest of us. The City Council is elected to make these kind of decisions and if the people don't like it then they can elect someone else.
 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
Originally posted by: Stunt
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: Stunt
Stupid question...

If the vast majority of people don't want Walmart in their city, wouldn't building the store hurt Walmart more? I mean investing all that money putting the store up, stocking it and training people...then having nobody shop there?

Of course the smaller businesses are going to be against more competition because the consumer has more power over the products they buy than the store owners do.

Let them build the Walmart, if *most* people don't want it there, then people will make that desicion for themselves. Why do these grandstanding idiots feel they know what's best for me?

Besides...do you guys have proof the small business owners give benefits and high wages to their employees? In my experience they use student labour (less than minimum wage).
No, you are the idiot. They have determined what is best for them and what is best for you only if you live there. This is democracy in action through the legislature at the city level. You don't like it, move or get enough people to vote to change what is the popular wish. Basically it's you who thinks like a Nazi because it's you who has the elite notion that what you want should be the rule. Try not to be so sociopath and immature. The city drew up careful plans with a 60000 sq foot max and WalGod thinks they have a divine right to make it 100000 because that suite them. The city said no, offered to take the property back, but WalScum thinks they can tell Hercules where to go.
A small number of "City Council" members do not know what is best for everybody. They are likely biased from the small business owners who do not feel they can differentiate their products or services enough to compete. This is no different than a small number of politicians on capital hill listening to big-tobacco or big-pharma. The only way to know how people really feel is giving them the choice, not getting a few politicans together to decide :p

I am not a "Nazi", I advocate freedom, choice and liberty...you feel our choices should be made for us by city council. The property issue you are completely correct, just the decision not to let walmart into the community is wrong.

In most of these communities, they're not blocking Wal-Mart specifically, they're simply capping max SF under their zoning laws for the retail areas in question. At that stage, it blocks every "big box" store, not only Wal-Mart.

Why don't they just open a Wal-Mart Jr? :p

In this case, the city council took a pretty radical action in using eminent domain, however if the citizens support it and the council takes action, I guess everyone who matters is in agreement.
 

Looney

Lifer
Jun 13, 2000
21,938
5
0
Originally posted by: Future Shock
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
I guess GenX has ridden the train that chugs through the lands of eminent domain while protesting the liberal who saves a buck at WalMart.

I also do not shop at WalMart because of what they are and how they pay their people. I go to CostCo for a deal.

COSTCO has the best retail model in the world at the moment, IMHO. I do ALL my shopping there (almost - I never need more than a small bit of some things like sugar). But the prices are great, and they treat their people with respect - nearly full medical coverage, living wages, and the works. They also have a great mix of brands - you CAN buy Prada handbags at my local COSTCO in northern England, along with Swarovski (sp?) crystal chess sets...and you can also buy dog food by the ton, and meat in economy 12 packs (very good meat too). Their "store label" Kirkwood coffee in 2lb cans is Starbucks-sourced (says so in fine print, and tastes it too). They have crossed a high-volume, high-bulk model with upscale branding, and it's frankly fantastic.

Oh, yeah - why did they do this? Because the founder and CEO of COSTCO is a NICE GUY that when interviewed obviously has his viewpoint much, much longer than next quarter's profits only...like where his brand-image will be in 5 years, and will most of his staff still be working for him then...bright, bright guy. I think Sam Walton was too, but his successors have none of Sam's innate goodness and homespun values, merely the next quarter's profits...

I agree with you 100%. I love Costco. It's a shame so many people abuse their return policy though.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,744
6,761
126
Originally posted by: Stunt
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: Stunt
Stupid question...

If the vast majority of people don't want Walmart in their city, wouldn't building the store hurt Walmart more? I mean investing all that money putting the store up, stocking it and training people...then having nobody shop there?

Of course the smaller businesses are going to be against more competition because the consumer has more power over the products they buy than the store owners do.

Let them build the Walmart, if *most* people don't want it there, then people will make that desicion for themselves. Why do these grandstanding idiots feel they know what's best for me?

Besides...do you guys have proof the small business owners give benefits and high wages to their employees? In my experience they use student labour (less than minimum wage).
No, you are the idiot. They have determined what is best for them and what is best for you only if you live there. This is democracy in action through the legislature at the city level. You don't like it, move or get enough people to vote to change what is the popular wish. Basically it's you who thinks like a Nazi because it's you who has the elite notion that what you want should be the rule. Try not to be so sociopath and immature. The city drew up careful plans with a 60000 sq foot max and WalGod thinks they have a divine right to make it 100000 because that suite them. The city said no, offered to take the property back, but WalScum thinks they can tell Hercules where to go.
A small number of "City Council" members do not know what is best for everybody. They are likely biased from the small business owners who do not feel they can differentiate their products or services enough to compete. This is no different than a small number of politicians on capital hill listening to big-tobacco or big-pharma. The only way to know how people really feel is giving them the choice, not getting a few politicans together to decide :p

I am not a "Nazi", I advocate freedom, choice and liberty...you feel our choices should be made for us by city council. The property issue you are completely correct, just the decision not to let walmart into the community is wrong.
The city sold WalMart the land. They were welcome at 60, 000 ft but they want 100, 000 and they were told no and with the option of returning the property for what they paid. But they don't want to give it back. Your cynicism as to the representativeness of an elected body, especially a local one, appealing though it may be to you, is not objective or based on personal knowledge. Why not assume these people are doing what the people of the city want. They spent a great deal of time and energy drafting a very detailed plan of what they wanted for their town. It is WalMart who thinks they know better and is elitist and way out of line.

I know you aren't a Nazi, but you took the Nazi side on this. :D

 

Engineer

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
39,230
701
126
Originally posted by: Genx87
I dont like my neighbor, think I will get the city to kick the bum out by taking his property.

This will fail in the court system and rightly so unless they can provide a reason for the city taking the land for public use.

Public use? Hell, just remember the SC just said that they can take it for private use. They could sell it to Joe Blow down the street for "business" purposes and the SCOTUS would be happy! :p
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: Stunt
A small number of "City Council" members do not know what is best for everybody. They are likely biased from the small business owners who do not feel they can differentiate their products or services enough to compete. This is no different than a small number of politicians on capital hill listening to big-tobacco or big-pharma. The only way to know how people really feel is giving them the choice, not getting a few politicans together to decide :p

I am not a "Nazi", I advocate freedom, choice and liberty...you feel our choices should be made for us by city council. The property issue you are completely correct, just the decision not to let walmart into the community is wrong.

Why are you so hell bent on Walmart having it's way over the will of the town people?

You're right, you may not be a "Nazi" but you are certainly a Corporate Whore.
 

homercles337

Diamond Member
Dec 29, 2004
6,340
3
71
Originally posted by: Starbuck1975
"I don't like to be threatened and they threatened my community,'' Bob Steiner, a certified public accountant and magician who lives in Hercules, said after the vote.
I wonder what types of businesses are considered acceptable by communities of CPA/magicians :D

They were probably hoping for an IKEA, and its oh so trendy Eurotrash furniture.

Nope there is already a HUGE one just down the raod in Emeryville.
 

homercles337

Diamond Member
Dec 29, 2004
6,340
3
71
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
I think there are two Walmarts 7 and 10 miles from this location. This is a high class city of well off people.

WalMart apparently thought they could build anything they wanted even though the city had prior detailed plans for what they had expected developers to follow. The Supreme Court explicitly ruled that it's legislatures that determine community good.

To add more deail to moonies' post, there are already 11 Walmarts within 30 miles of Hercules. Yes, i said ELEVEN! WTF?! I live in Cambridge (Mass) and i bet there arent 11 grocery stores within 30 miles...
 

DarkKnight69

Golden Member
Jun 15, 2005
1,688
0
76
Originally posted by: techs
Originally posted by: Starbuck1975
No it's Wally World getting their asses handed to them imminently.
That you gain satisfaction from the potential screwing over of a corporation is disturbing...capitalism and a highly efficient business model is what made Wallmart successful.

Regardless, this is hardly a pebble in the road for Walmart...let the town of Hercules have its victory...Walmart can just build another store the next town over, that I am sure some of these residents will end up shopping at once they smell the sweet aroma of rock bottom prices.
What made Walmart efficient was squeezing every last possible penny out of its employees and suppliers, by lowering wages and benefits so its employees needed government benefits to get by, and by predatory pricing as it forced out local businesses with low prices and raised the prices when local businesses went under. It also became efficient by forcing its suppliers to off shore manufacturing.
While there is nothing illegal about that it has had a harmful effect on communities, workers, our government, our foreign policies, perhaps even the long term survival of the middle class in America.

Do you work at walmart or do you go by what magazines and SI groups say?

I DO work for them and there are a few things you should know before you judge so harshly. Walmart does not 'underpay' their staff, they pay the market. I make more at Walmart then I was offered at Sears, BestBuy, Zellers, SuperStore, Target, ect. I am offered stock purchase with 15% company add on, i get benefits and though they are not great, they are not horrible, I get 10% discount, which may not seem like much, but considering prices are lower then anyone else, I dont complain. Every Year we are entitled to a bonus of total sales in the store of which mine this year was almost 2k. (Nice cheque) and I also get a retirement plan in my name that is built by the company to do with what I please.

Walmart is no worse then anyother of the big box companies as far as I am concerned, and I work for them...
 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
Originally posted by: DarkKnight69
Originally posted by: techs
Originally posted by: Starbuck1975
No it's Wally World getting their asses handed to them imminently.
That you gain satisfaction from the potential screwing over of a corporation is disturbing...capitalism and a highly efficient business model is what made Wallmart successful.

Regardless, this is hardly a pebble in the road for Walmart...let the town of Hercules have its victory...Walmart can just build another store the next town over, that I am sure some of these residents will end up shopping at once they smell the sweet aroma of rock bottom prices.
What made Walmart efficient was squeezing every last possible penny out of its employees and suppliers, by lowering wages and benefits so its employees needed government benefits to get by, and by predatory pricing as it forced out local businesses with low prices and raised the prices when local businesses went under. It also became efficient by forcing its suppliers to off shore manufacturing.
While there is nothing illegal about that it has had a harmful effect on communities, workers, our government, our foreign policies, perhaps even the long term survival of the middle class in America.

Do you work at walmart or do you go by what magazines and SI groups say?

I DO work for them and there are a few things you should know before you judge so harshly. Walmart does not 'underpay' their staff, they pay the market. I make more at Walmart then I was offered at Sears, BestBuy, Zellers, SuperStore, Target, ect. I am offered stock purchase with 15% company add on, i get benefits and though they are not great, they are not horrible, I get 10% discount, which may not seem like much, but considering prices are lower then anyone else, I dont complain. Every Year we are entitled to a bonus of total sales in the store of which mine this year was almost 2k. (Nice cheque) and I also get a retirement plan in my name that is built by the company to do with what I please.

Walmart is no worse then anyother of the big box companies as far as I am concerned, and I work for them...

Sorry, but working at Wal-Mart (probably at the management level) doesn't negate the fact that Costco pays its employees 40% more and spends thousands more per year on each employee's benefits package. There's simply no denying that Costco is an employee-centric company and Wal-Mart is not.

Still don't believe it? Digest these facts:

A BusinessWeek analysis shows Costco's average hourly wage is $15.97, far above the Wal-Mart (Sam's Club) $11.52 figure, even excluding the 25 percent of Wal-Mart workers who are low-paid part-timers.

The yearly employer contributions to health care -- Costco, $5,735; Wal-Mart, $3,500. Of Costco employees, 82 percent are covered by the health plan; Wal-Mart, 47 percent. Employee turnover at Wal-Mart is three times higher than Costco's.

And then comes the clincher, suggesting the low-road approach may not be so clever after all: Costco's profit per employee is $13,647; Wal-Mart's, $11,039.

Paying good wages and benefits, says Costco CEO Jim Sinegal, "is not altruistic; this is good business."

Linkage
 

alphatarget1

Diamond Member
Dec 9, 2001
5,710
0
76
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Starbuck1975
No it's Wally World getting their asses handed to them imminently.
That you gain satisfaction from the potential screwing over of a corporation is disturbing...capitalism and a highly efficient business model is what made Wallmart successful.

Regardless, this is hardly a pebble in the road for Walmart...let the town of Hercules have its victory...Walmart can just build another store the next town over, that I am sure some of these residents will end up shopping at once they smell the sweet aroma of rock bottom prices.

Originally posted by: Genx87
I dont like my neighbor, think I will get the city to kick the bum out by taking his property.

This will fail in the court system and rightly so unless they can provide a reason for the city taking the land for public use.

On top of that these small business owners must not have faith in their fellow citizen to not buy from Walmart and are using the strong arm of the govt to supress the free market.

I find it funny so many spoke out against Walmart when you know they would be the first in line to get the best deal.

True Americans recognize that "rock bottom prices" and the "best deal" doesn't have to mean selling America out.

Hopefully you America haters will continue to lose.

That is a load of horseshit and you know it. True Americans dont believe the govt is an oppressive machine they can craft to weed out who they dont want.

What next, these guys pass laws or ordinances outlawing blacks and hispanics and taking their land?
Is that what a "true" American would want? Or some sick fascist or socialist who believes the govt is their god?

Newsflash: people don't WANT a Walmart there. Democrazy in action.
 

DarkKnight69

Golden Member
Jun 15, 2005
1,688
0
76
Hmm, that is funny, I have a freind who recently became employed at costco.

He makes about $0.25 cents more then our starting wage...and his benefits are the same...
 

TheBeast

Senior member
Oct 10, 1999
581
0
0
Still don't believe it? Digest these facts:


quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A BusinessWeek analysis shows Costco's average hourly wage is $15.97, far above the Wal-Mart (Sam's Club) $11.52 figure, even excluding the 25 percent of Wal-Mart workers who are low-paid part-timers.

The yearly employer contributions to health care -- Costco, $5,735; Wal-Mart, $3,500. Of Costco employees, 82 percent are covered by the health plan; Wal-Mart, 47 percent. Employee turnover at Wal-Mart is three times higher than Costco's.

And then comes the clincher, suggesting the low-road approach may not be so clever after all: Costco's profit per employee is $13,647; Wal-Mart's, $11,039.

Paying good wages and benefits, says Costco CEO Jim Sinegal, "is not altruistic; this is good business."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Linkage

Then go to the quoted sourceand see what it really says.

No mention of "even excluding the 25 percent of Wal-Mart workers who are low-paid part-timers. "

An average wage really is not accurate when you compare one company with 30% more employees spread across different areas of the country. As I said, if you want accuracy, you'll compare wages between Costco and Sam's in a particular geographic area. That is apples to apples, not apples to oranges.

See any mention of "The yearly employer contributions to health care -- Costco, $5,735; Wal-Mart, $3,500. Of Costco employees, 82 percent are covered by the health plan; Wal-Mart, 47 percent. " in the quoted piece? Where did it come from?
 

piasabird

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
17,168
60
91
Communities have a right to establish building codes in an effort to promote the kind of community that is right for them. Every town does not necessarily need a Wal-mart.

One man's pedatory pricing is another man's competition. There is a fine line between competition and Monopoly. If you compared Walmart to a company like Microsoft, you might find some parallels. If Walmart was percieved as becoming a monopoly they could be considered as breaking the law, and fall under the same legislation as Microsoft. Even if Walmart is not considered as a Monopoly, their business could result in a predatory business environment that could cause a Monopoly, whether it is a natural monopoly or it is a company that tries to control many sectors of the market, it could be considered t be illegal because it results in a monopoly. From an outsiders point of view if the result is one company takes over a market, then it is considered predatory and anti-competitive whether by design or by the lack of a real competitor.
 

TheBeast

Senior member
Oct 10, 1999
581
0
0
Walmart is nowhere near a monopoly. You've got Target, SuperValu stores, a host of grocery stores, Costco, Walgreens, CVS, Rite Aid, etc. etc. etc. Any talk of monopoly is ludacris.
 

Starbuck1975

Lifer
Jan 6, 2005
14,698
1,909
126
So let's re-cap: Costco workers make 40% more than Wal-Mart workers. Costco shells out thousands of $ more per year for beneifts. WTF more do you want to know? Go compare your benefits to the Costco benefits package I linked above.
And over time, if Costco has a better business model that provides the same goods and services while also promoting an employee friendly public relations image, they will ultimately expand while Walmart will continue to face hurdles such as the scenario in Hercules.

This will cause Walmart to revisit their business practices, or risk losing market share in the high volume/low cost market.

And capitalism once again prevails.