- May 23, 2002
- 16,928
- 8
- 81
OK, let me start by saying I've read a bunch of website and things that state the benefits of one vs the other vary by speed and things like that. I'm going to describe my two specific options and want to see what everything would recommend.
At work, we have a path around our building that's approximately 1.5 miles. I only get 35 minutes for lunch. My current schedule is to eat quickly and get outside to walk within 10 minutes. It takes me about 20 minutes to walk the path and leaves 5 to get back inside and up to my desk. I walk for the exercise but sometimes feel like going for a run.
The reason I don't run is because I sweat like crazy and don't have time to take a shower or anything else before going back to work. However since it's much cooler out now than in the middle of the summer (I'm in WI), I could now potentially run at work. The second option I came up with is:
Not eat. Go from my desk, change clothes and get outside within 3-5 minutes. Walk out to the path and streth a bit (5-6 minutes). Run the path (11-12 minutes). This leaves me 12 minutes to do a +/-5 minute cool down walk, get back inside to change, and get back to my desk.
My question is, how does the ~20 minute walk compare to the 10 minute walk plus the 12 minute run.
I guess I could try to get my heart rate monitor working and just do a test but figured I'd get the take of anyone else that might have already tested or researched this same thing.
At work, we have a path around our building that's approximately 1.5 miles. I only get 35 minutes for lunch. My current schedule is to eat quickly and get outside to walk within 10 minutes. It takes me about 20 minutes to walk the path and leaves 5 to get back inside and up to my desk. I walk for the exercise but sometimes feel like going for a run.
The reason I don't run is because I sweat like crazy and don't have time to take a shower or anything else before going back to work. However since it's much cooler out now than in the middle of the summer (I'm in WI), I could now potentially run at work. The second option I came up with is:
Not eat. Go from my desk, change clothes and get outside within 3-5 minutes. Walk out to the path and streth a bit (5-6 minutes). Run the path (11-12 minutes). This leaves me 12 minutes to do a +/-5 minute cool down walk, get back inside to change, and get back to my desk.
My question is, how does the ~20 minute walk compare to the 10 minute walk plus the 12 minute run.
I guess I could try to get my heart rate monitor working and just do a test but figured I'd get the take of anyone else that might have already tested or researched this same thing.