Madcatatlas
Golden Member
- Feb 22, 2010
- 1,155
- 0
- 0
obviously that picture lies. That middle connecter is not gonna be there on the launched product.
3D Vision Surround. Most of the compatible monitors are dual-link DVI only, so if NV used DP, they'd have to pack in very expensive DP-to-DL-DVI adapters.Yea, I'm kind of surprised this ultra highend part doesn't have that. Even the Intel graphics based laptops we deploy at work all have display port (Elitebook 8440P's). It would probably get rid of that awkwardly placed DVI port if they used display port or more HDMI.
I'm sure they have their reasons... but I can't help but think even HDMI ports would have made more sense. < shrug >
3D Vision Surround. Most of the compatible monitors are dual-link DVI only, so if NV used DP, they'd have to pack in very expensive DP-to-DL-DVI adapters.
But most people looking at that set up have money for this hobby. They could have done HDMI and/or DP. I just think it looks odd, but if it doesn't affect cooling ability, then it shouldn't really matter (I don't climb behind my computer very often to see how pretty the back of my cards are).
Overclocked models from day one heh
659,1
CUDA Cores: 1024
Graphics Clock: 668MHz
Processor Clock: 1224MHz
Memory Clock: 3628MHz
Memory Interface Width: 2 x 384-bit
Memory Config: 3GB GDDR5
Power Connectors: Dual 8-pin
Dimensions: 11" x 4.5", Dual Slot
http://www.4frags.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=29235&name=pov/tgt+geforce+gtx590+charged
709,00
CUDA Cores: 1024
Graphics Clock: 691MHz
Processor Clock: 1224MHz
Memory Clock: 3710MHz
Memory Interface Width: 2 x 384-bit
Memory Config: 3GB GDDR5
Power Connectors: Dual 8-pin
Dimensions: 11" x 4.5", Dual Slot
http://www.4frags.com/catalog/produ...234&name=pov/tgt+geforce+gtx590+ultra+charged
Note: Overclocking capability may be varied by different cards and platform. Extreme cooling is required to achieve 150% faster.
lol, I guess they don't realize 150% faster means 2.5 times as fast.
@IDC
Yeah that 3rd DVI port... right smack in the middle... so it can cut off air flow (/_\)
That doesnt make sense to me... but what do I know.
the fan choice looks odd too, it looks like the type that blows air downards... but it needs to blow it to the sides so each of those heatsinks on the sides of it can get cooled. Maybe because of the size of the fan, it can move enough air anyways... but it seems like a odd choice.
No idea... I suspect part of the reason the price is so high is because its new and flashy...
But yeah... doubt they ll sell cheaper than a 6990, which is most likely gonna out performan the 590.
691 mhz is a 13% overclock - very respectable for an x2 card.
Mmm ... looks like the 590 is a lot quieter than the hd 6990, and only slightly more noisier than the gtx 580.
...But how is that possible?
Mmm ... looks like the 590 is a lot quieter than the hd 6990, and only slightly more noisier than the gtx 580.
...But how is that possible?
How did AT get 70 dBA for the 6990 noise?
They had their ear next to it and backed up 70 feet when they tested the noise for the 590.
EDIT1: Someone has 590 benchmarks. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZxPqroC37c
It looks like it trade blows with the 6990.
If you're gonna go all out, you'll pick a quad SLI or CFx4 , WC it and OC it to death - any day over getting 2x 2-gpu cardEdit: 3rd factor, ultimate rig with SLI 590 or CF 6990 and multi monitor performance. If ur gonna go all out, may as well go all out and get 2 of these cards.
No, just no .
The original GPU is more than 20% faster, 13% overclock means total fail and 7% underclock at least.
You're still better off getting real cooling and clocking it back to 580 levels