• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

VNC, TightVNC, Remote Administrator, Remote Desktop, or something else...which do you prefer?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: TallGeese
Originally posted by: Scarpozzi
The main reasons I prefer it is because.....3.-It provides 128 bit encryption
As does Terminal Services, subject to the following caveat:
When you install the 128-bit High Encryption pack and use high encryption on a Windows 2000 Terminal Services computer, all of the information that is passed from the client to the server in a Terminal Services session is not encrypted.
From MS KnowledgeBase

What then would you recommend TG? I need to access a server and want the data I'm transfering to the server to be secure.
 
Originally posted by: Geekbabe
Originally posted by: TallGeese
Originally posted by: Scarpozzi
The main reasons I prefer it is because.....3.-It provides 128 bit encryption
As does Terminal Services, subject to the following caveat:
When you install the 128-bit High Encryption pack and use high encryption on a Windows 2000 Terminal Services computer, all of the information that is passed from the client to the server in a Terminal Services session is not encrypted.
From MS KnowledgeBase

What then would you recommend TG? I need to access a server and want the data I'm transfering to the server to be secure.

i think u might be misunderstanding something. Not all the info is encrypted...if u read it properly only some acks and some non-impt info
are unencrypted...the rest ARE encrypted.
 
remote desktop, very reliable. i can use the client at work, or the web client if im at another computer. I don't know what I'd do without it.

actually, i'd probably be more productive. 😉
 
Originally posted by: rnmcd
what is SSH?

yes, what is SSH?

Remote Administator users: is this compatible with WinXP Pro?

I didn't see that it was (from the info on their site).

Any other votes?
 
i use a combination of ssh and tightvnc.

ssh has a compression so does tightvnc and when you use them

together it runs really smooth, really close to terminal services.

and since i am running tightvnc thru ssh all the traffic is secured ( well

as secure as ssh is )

for those who dont know ssh is secure shell. in a nutshell it is just like telnet that is secure.
 
Netop, it rules very fast. i use it for non citrix clients

Citrix for users logged onto my servers. but only to troubleshoot whats wrong with their app. Citrix does not give you remote control of another persons pc.

 
I guess TightVIC for cross platform compatibility...
For Windows networks, Remote Administrator is the best IMO....
 
For Remote Administration, I like:

Terminal Services for Windows 2000 or XP
PcAnywhere or VNC for Windows 9X and NT
X-Win32 for UNIX
Desktop On-Call for odd-ball specialized tasks. It's different than the others, because it runs as a Java applet from a web browser. It also supports SSL.
 
Back
Top