vista

[rbrandon]

Originally posted by: heedoyiu
plus i heard some bs about you need like 1gb to run it,
regardless anyone else just want simplier less resource useing os?
where are the hybrid os versions?

no, you need 4 gigs, a 10 gigaflop processor, 3 TB hd, and a 100b net connection. hows that for resource conservation?



hybrid os? does it run on hydrogen as well?

 

[AnonymouseUser]

Originally posted by: BriGy86
<sarcasm>well since im better than everyone else here, i'd like to say that i'll stick with my *insert brand of linux here*. everyone knows that its supremely better than anything microsoft could come up with, because lets face it, its so much easier to use... even for techno idiots such as my dad A.K.A "captain caveman</sarcasm>

in all honesty i will probably be getting it if its as good or better than XP, and if the price is right

<sarcasm>Yep, that is exactly how all of us Linux users feel. You people are all below us on the evolution scale.</sarcasm>

In all honesty, I will probably not be getting it if its as good or better than XP, even if the price is right.

 

[Rubycon]

You know a new version of Windows is far overdue.

XP was released nearly four years ago. Never has so much time gone by between previous versions.

(Real versions only)

Windows NT 4.0 1997 (4.0)
Windows 2000 2000 (5.0)
Windows XP 2001 (5.1)
Windows Vista 2006? (6.0?)

 

[AnonymouseUser]

TTT (for Nik)

 

[Stretchman]

Nah, i'm sittin pretty with XP Pro. It's fine.

 

[BrokenVisage]

My CPU is cold with Solution

 

[SynthDude2001]

Originally posted by: BrokenVisage
My CPU is cold with Solution

:laugh:

 

[Rubycon]

Originally posted by: BrokenVisage
My CPU is cold with Solution

My CPU is old with pollution.

 

[Cal166]

Tried the beta version, didnt like it at all. Hopefully the final version will fix up the user interface and other crap. I almost lost all my files on there when i was clicking it too damn fast.