Virginia Ex-GOP Sen. John Warner endorses Democrat

[Londo_Jowo]

Sarcasm on the Internet can be a real bitch sometimes

Your support of his vindictive act/s is so telling.

It appears that the video has been restored, I guess youtube didn't find his claims truthful.

 

[Londo_Jowo]

I've taught him to bark, roll over, and play brain dead. I just can't seem to get him to shake.

All you've done is prove to all that you have a mental illness - compulsive obsession disorder and depression. Self loathing is just an extension of your illness.

 

[Doc Savage Fan]

Moonie, did you actually report that video?

 

[Londo_Jowo]

Moonie, did you actually report that video?

Two or three days ago the link worked as I wondered what else A. Crowley had said, the link led to a video of Heart singing Magic Man. After Moonbeam posted in this thread that he/his multiple personalities had reported the contents I checked the link. Rather than going to video the link led to a screen saying that the video had been removed as well as the person's account had been disabled.

 

[Moonbeam]

Two or three days ago the link worked as I wondered what else A. Crowley had said, the link led to a video of Heart singing Magic Man. After Moonbeam posted in this thread that he/his multiple personalities had reported the contents I checked the link. Rather than going to video the link led to a screen saying that the video had been removed as well as the person's account had been disabled.

That's what I saw too about a month ago and yesterday.

Moonie, did you actually report that video?

Good grief no. MagickMan thinks I have multiple accounts here and elsewhere on the internet, that I am a master hacker who can post as LunarRay and Moone at the same time, and that I am a schizophrenic etc etc etc, so I suggested that I used all that talent to pettily fuck with him. Londo bought if out of conformational bias. He wants to see me in a negative light. I was curious as to what the link would add to the quote so I checked it out maybe a month ago and saw that it was taken down. I likned it a few times yesterday and it was the same thing. I thought MagickMan should know and wondered why he didn't seem to, guessing that the link worked for him. It worked earlier today and thank God it didn't work for Londo or it would just be one more thing they would say I lie about.

When you look at the sad emotional condition of folk who practice false witness, why on earth would one want to add to their misery. I feel sad they feel so small as to be threatened by me. But you know this because like calls to like.

PS: I'm betting I will never convince Londo I didn't rat on that link. Trust me, I have no idea even how to on my one and only IP.

 

[Londo_Jowo]

That's what I saw too about a month ago and yesterday.

That's not what I saw 2 to 3 days ago.

 

[Moonbeam]

That's not what I saw 2 to 3 days ago.

yes, I see, right but you did see that the video was removed like I did and it is working for me just a few seconds ago so whatever the problem with the link is, it isn't me. I saw it work the first time yesterday, one time out of about four tries.

 

[MagickMan]

That's what I saw too about a month ago and yesterday.

Good grief no. MagickMan thinks I have multiple accounts here and elsewhere on the internet, that I am a master hacker who can post as LunarRay and Moone at the same time, and that I am a schizophrenic etc etc etc, so I suggested that I used all that talent to pettily fuck with him. Londo bought if out of conformational bias. He wants to see me in a negative light. I was curious as to what the link would add to the quote so I checked it out maybe a month ago and saw that it was taken down. I likned it a few times yesterday and it was the same thing. I thought MagickMan should know and wondered why he didn't seem to, guessing that the link worked for him. It worked earlier today and thank God it didn't work for Londo or it would just be one more thing they would say I lie about.

When you look at the sad emotional condition of folk who practice false witness, why on earth would one want to add to their misery. I feel sad they feel so small as to be threatened by me. But you know this because like calls to like.

PS: I'm betting I will never convince Londo I didn't rat on that link. Trust me, I have no idea even how to on my one and only IP.

I *know* you have multiple accounts here (working as yin/yang), but I don't care, that's your issue and you have to deal with it.

Interesting that you bring up "bearing false witness", because every time you open your mouth to abuse someone on this forum, you do that. You reveal that you aren't what you've claimed to be. It's not about me wanting to see you in any light, it's how you openly present yourself, with all the insults.

 

[Londo_Jowo]

yes, I see, right but you did see that the video was removed like I did and it is working for me just a few seconds ago so whatever the problem with the link is, it isn't me. I saw it work the first time yesterday, one time out of about four tries.

This not a site issue, the video was taken down due to complaints and could be reached every time. The video was working fine when I looked at it either a day or two days before you claimed to have complained/got it taken down.

So Mr Truthiness please tell me were you lying about getting the video taken down or now when you claim you had nothing to do with the video being taken down??

 

[Moonbeam]

This not a site issue, the video was taken down due to complaints and could be reached every time. The video was working fine when I looked at it either a day or two days before you claimed to have complained/got it taken down.

So Mr Truthiness please tell me were you lying about getting the video taken down or now when you claim you had nothing to do with the video being taken down??

Well why is it that when I last looked it was fine and why did MM ask what I was talking about since it seems to work for him. I have no idea what the problem is but I know it's not me. I wouldn't know what a utube violation consisted of if it flew up my nose. Please be enough of a gentleman to take my word for it. Surely this can be explained by somebody who is interested. It's not my link and I don't give a flying fig what the problem is or isn't.

 

[Moonbeam]

I *know* you have multiple accounts here (working as yin/yang), but I don't care, that's your issue and you have to deal with it.

Interesting that you bring up "bearing false witness", because every time you open your mouth to abuse someone on this forum, you do that. You reveal that you aren't what you've claimed to be. It's not about me wanting to see you in any light, it's how you openly present yourself, with all the insults.

You can't *know* I have multiple accounts here because I actually know I don't, so in real fact in the real world, I *know* you are full of shit. Furthermore, you claimed to know that LunarRay and I are the same person because by writing style which is also impossible, first of all because we are different people and secondly we have completely different styles. You are just a nasty person who is vindictive and wants to believe their vindictiveness is justified because it smells so bad. Your problem, furthermore, is that you find the truth insulting, not that I blame you.

 

[MagickMan]

You can't *know* I have multiple accounts here because I actually know I don't, so in real fact in the real world, I *know* you are full of shit. Furthermore, you claimed to know that LunarRay and I are the same person because by writing style which is also impossible, first of all because we are different people and secondly we have completely different styles. You are just a nasty person who is vindictive and wants to believe their vindictiveness is justified because it smells so bad. Your problem, furthermore, is that you find the truth insulting, not that I blame you.

I've seen people with DID have different handwriting from one personality to the next, so a change in typing styles is nothing extraordinary. ie. one using ellipses more heavily than the other, etc.. However, your alter ego has the same vocabulary (other than the profanity), uses the same phrases, and has another very distinct similarity that I won't divulge here, but have mentioned to others (and they've noticed it too). Overall, however, we don't care enough to try and push the subject. I've already learned to integrate what both of you say, to find the more "sane" middle ground. :\

Comically, I'm not a vindictive person, I don't cyberstalk others from one place to another, and if you'll actually go back and research our "history" you'll see that you started the nasty business between us, some time back, what animosity exists is of your creation (verbal abuse and baseless accusations aimed at me when I was new here). In point of fact, you're reaping what you've sown, and you've done exactly the same with Londo. That's your reward.

 

[LunarRay]

I *know* you have multiple accounts here (working as yin/yang), but I don't care, that's your issue and you have to deal with it.

Interesting that you bring up "bearing false witness", because every time you open your mouth to abuse someone on this forum, you do that. You reveal that you aren't what you've claimed to be. It's not about me wanting to see you in any light, it's how you openly present yourself, with all the insults.

I am intrigued by the certainty you manifest in this two account scenario. It must be a faith based position given a scientific one would have developed the hypothesis and tried to falsify it or have it falsified. I do recall prior posts wherein you did explain some mechanism that would provide what to me were logical falsification of the hypothesis you propounded. I know that the mod folks were challenged over the years by posters claiming the same thing and it seems that is not good enough for you... I wonder why.

Regarding writing style... I'm much more subtle than Moonster and often if not always have more than one thought contained in a simple paragraph... Often hidden... and unnoticed because of the speed the reader feels compelled to provide to the post.... IF at all .

The bit that really is interesting is the bit that can't be right but yet you persist in holding that and refuse to let go... Now that may be a ruse which is fine but if you really do believe what you allege and won't budge off that something must be forcing that to occur.... I know the truth and Moonbeam does too... and so do the powers to be on this forum... so that is why it is of interest to me...

Moonbeam and his research point to defects, etc... He uses a higher power... like what ought to be right as the basis to call a defect a defect.. I think.
I'm not so sure the holding of a falsifiable hypothesis as certain does not actually prove his point... Would you consider using the term possible...?? And if not why not?

 

[MagickMan]

I am intrigued by the certainty you manifest in this two account scenario. It must be a faith based position given a scientific one would have developed the hypothesis and tried to falsify it or have it falsified. I do recall prior posts wherein you did explain some mechanism that would provide what to me were logical falsification of the hypothesis you propounded. I know that the mod folks were challenged over the years by posters claiming the same thing and it seems that is not good enough for you... I wonder why.

Regarding writing style... I'm much more subtle than Moonster and often if not always have more than one thought contained in a simple paragraph... Often hidden... and unnoticed because of the speed the reader feels compelled to provide to the post.... IF at all .

The bit that really is interesting is the bit that can't be right but yet you persist in holding that and refuse to let go... Now that may be a ruse which is fine but if you really do believe what you allege and won't budge off that something must be forcing that to occur.... I know the truth and Moonbeam does too... and so do the powers to be on this forum... so that is why it is of interest to me...

Moonbeam and his research point to defects, etc... He uses a higher power... like what ought to be right as the basis to call a defect a defect.. I think.
I'm not so sure the holding of a falsifiable hypothesis as certain does not actually prove his point... Would you consider using the term possible...?? And if not why not?

"Can't" be right, because you say so? That's amazing... :\ I know you're one in the same physically, but not in mentality. As I said though, I don't care if each personality has its own account. I've even told the admins that I don't want you to be banned, however it's important that others know what's going on, so they can see the entire picture WRT the "both" of you. The reactions to my statements about this over the last few months have been a revelation, and only reinforce what I suspected for years.