According to this the CU's are new.
Although, without any info from AMD we don't know what/if anything is new(er) with Vega.
According to this the CU's are new.
Although, without any info from AMD we don't know what/if anything is new(er) with Vega.
Yep, I thought it was weird as well.
Just like I thought it was weird that a GTX 980 Ti is unable, less overclocked, to keep up with a FuryX at 4K resolution. You'd think that 96ROps would dominate 64ROps but that's not the case.
Even at stock clocks, the GTX 980 Ti clocks its ROps higher than those of a FuryX. The GTX 980 Ti's caches are also clocked higher than those of a FuryX (as ROps also tap into their own caches and/or the available L2 cache).
People who looked at Fiji's 64 ROps and claimed they were weak simply weren't taking any of the pipelining, dedicated caches and available memory bandwidth into consideration.
If we do take these elements into consideration then we can see how a die shrink, from 28nm to 14LPP, can result in a dramatic increase in Global Memory usage efficiency due to there being more room for more robust memory controller logic.
I think that at 4K, the Fiji massive shader array starts to stretch its legs. If you think this way, 3840 x 2160 = 8294400 pixels on screen. The GPU must execute at least 8294400 pixel shader programs.
At lower resolutions GM200 might have a better ROP/shader count combination that makes it shine.
According to this the CU's are new.
Although, without any info from AMD we don't know what/if anything is new(er) with Vega.
According by some AMD's bridgman, Polaris is a "superset "of GCN 1.2.
Source:https://www.phoronix.com/forums/for...ort-lands-in-mesa-s-radeonsi-gallium3d-driverbridgman said:
I'm not expecting a revolution in the CU area.
Did you even bother to read that link? 8800M series in laptops is with the GCN1.1 cards and Dave Baumann explicity stated that OpenCL2.0 conformance happens with GCN1.1(in his words GCN2) and later.
Polaris uses the same gfx ip as Tonga/Fiji and it's been confirmed with the open source driver release by AMD. You can see its comparison with previous AMD chips here,
https://www.forum-3dcenter.org/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=10980597&postcount=1966
Though an AMD employee has clarified that this only means that the software side remains unchanged from Tonga/Fiji and that he does expect significant hardware changes in Polaris.
https://www.beyond3d.com/content/interviews/43
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTE4ODU
Last edited:
I did read the links. One was a marketing slide from AMD, and another is a post you made complaining about how Wizzard was wrong to call 8xxxM GCN1.0, since it's based on the Venus die. You were just incorrect on that, since Venus is GCN1.0
Venus:
Cape Verde:
Same GCN1.0 123mm² Cape Verde die as the HD7770.
On the graphics level, I wouldn't exactly call it the same IP if Polaris is a superset of the 8.0 level, but the hardware itself is significantly changed.
Last edited:
IntelUser2000
Elite Member
- Oct 14, 2003
- 8,686
- 3,787
- 136
There's also that its using very different memory. SDRAM to DDR SDRAM resulted in not quite 2x bandwidth. Single Channel to Dual Channel wasn't 2x either. Every single memory generation from DDR to DDR4 wasn't 2x despite 2x speeds(I'm talking about bandwidth).
It wouldn't surprise me if 2x theoretical bandwidth for HBM didn't equal 2x but 1.6-1.8x. Then you are talking about only 30-45% more bandwidth rather than 60%.
Glo.
Diamond Member
- Apr 25, 2015
- 5,930
- 4,991
- 136
According to this the CU's are new.
Although, without any info from AMD we don't know what/if anything is new(er) with Vega.
I have thought a bit about it. 36 CUs from that SiSoft may mean that software reports that CUs have 64 shaders. But in reality it may have different core count...
That would mitigate smaller number of ROPs in the core, if that is the case.
I would! Even AMD's marek did say it, just bellow brigman's post
That confirms it would work with mismatched legacy LLVM issued code. It does not in any way confirm that Polaris goes no faster with properly matched and targeted code.
Absolutely. :thumbsup:
What I wanted to say was that I do not expect a big improvement in the ISA. Certainly new instructions, but not like a big jump from today's Gen3.
Polaris seems (to me) like a natural evolution from Fiji with most of the updates around the CUs, especially in the Frontend.
I did read the links. One was a marketing slide from AMD, and another is a post you made complaining about how Wizzard was wrong to call 8xxxM GCN1.0, since it's based on the Venus die. You were just incorrect on that, since Venus is GCN1.0
Venus:
Cape Verde:
Same GCN1.0 123mm² Cape Verde die as the HD7770.
On the graphics level, I wouldn't exactly call it the same IP if Polaris is a superset of the 8.0 level, but the hardware itself is significantly changed.
*facepalm*
The point about Venus was that M370X should show up as Venus in GPUz and not Cape Verde.
And what you didn't bother to read was this,
OpenCL2.0 conformance happens with GCN2 and later. 8870M is Venus XT, the same chip in M370X according to Wizzard himself and thus be mentioned as such in GPUz.
I suppose one option is that Vega 10 is 4096 cores with 1/2 DP while Vega 11 is some smaller amount of cores (but still 1/2 DP) with the intention of that die being mostly used for the Zen HPC APUs.
TRENDING THREADS
-
News NVIDIA and Intel to Develop AI Infrastructure and Personal Computing Products- Started by poke01
- Replies: 307
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 22K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
Facebook
Twitter