Video on Pentagon to be released

[imported_Aelius]

Originally posted by: alchemize

Originally posted by: Aelius

Originally posted by: alchemize

Originally posted by: Meuge
If all you wanted was for the building to fall, there would be no need for airplanes to crash into it. I've said this before.

And as far as placing thermite... do you really think the support beams are exposed in skyscrapers? They are encased in concrete and fireproofing material. That's why you drill, and that's why you use shaped charges.

Bah - all that drilling, and torch-cutting of rebar, and support weakening they do in construction jobs is really just to run up the billing rate - it serves no purpose

Further proof you have no idea what you are talking about even on the surface. Nice try trying to seem informed.

Typo - meant demolition typed construction. Doesn't really matter - all the tinfoil in the world couldn't wrap that swollen head of yours, Mr. 3D.

So far you proved that you don't have a point to prove. By all means continue.

 

[Meuge]

Originally posted by: Aelius

Originally posted by: alchemize

Originally posted by: Aelius

Originally posted by: alchemize

Originally posted by: Meuge
If all you wanted was for the building to fall, there would be no need for airplanes to crash into it. I've said this before.

And as far as placing thermite... do you really think the support beams are exposed in skyscrapers? They are encased in concrete and fireproofing material. That's why you drill, and that's why you use shaped charges.

Bah - all that drilling, and torch-cutting of rebar, and support weakening they do in construction jobs is really just to run up the billing rate - it serves no purpose

Further proof you have no idea what you are talking about even on the surface. Nice try trying to seem informed.

Typo - meant demolition typed construction. Doesn't really matter - all the tinfoil in the world couldn't wrap that swollen head of yours, Mr. 3D.

So far you proved that you don't have a point to prove. By all means continue.

You're not trying to prove anything anymore... you're just trying to get the last word in.

 

[MadRat]

So did they or did they not release a new video?

 

[AAjax]

I really dont see why its such a great leap of faith to imagine people in the US gov commiting acts of treason/murder to get their way.

its been proven that they planned for it before.

 

[EagleKeeper]

Originally posted by: AAjax
I really dont see why its such a great leap of faith to imagine people in the US gov commiting acts of treason/murder to get their way.

its been proven that they planned for it before.

ignored

And also rejected - which is convientlycompletely ignored by those that publish such a story or buried in small print at the bottom of the pages.

 

[AAjax]

To Kennedy's credit he did reject this plan, however the point being that such plans were (and are?) approved by the joint cheifs without the authors being charged with treason.

edit-
Kinda makes you wonder how many other plans with said objectives have been put forward, and how many of them were accepted/rejected. The author of this plan retired with full military pension and was never prosecuted for this crime. Dont think its a crime? Try penning up a plan like this yourself with real intent on commiting it and see how long your free on the streets. Moral is, if your a joint cheif its OK, if your joe citizen, your a terrorist.