**VIDEO** Awesome Animation! A Must See!

[Futher]

Awesome movie. Too bad they got some interlacing problems when they compressed it =/

 

[cerebusPu]

bookmark for later. no speakers and time at work now.

 

[Ornery]

Originally posted by: Shockwave

Originally posted by: Brutuskend
It crashed IE for me...

Your browser, like you, is Old and Busted. You need to upgrade to the New Hotness. Well, at least upgrade the browser anyways....

:roll:

Oh brother. Runs fine on my PIII Celeron with Win98 and IE6

Edit: Oh yeah, it was cool too, thanks warcrow!

 

[Mallow]

very cool ani

 

[Ne0]

Very Nice.

 

[Shockwave]

Originally posted by: Ornery

Originally posted by: Shockwave

Originally posted by: Brutuskend
It crashed IE for me...

Your browser, like you, is Old and Busted. You need to upgrade to the New Hotness. Well, at least upgrade the browser anyways....

:roll:

Oh brother. Runs fine on my PIII Celeron with Win98 and IE6

Edit: Oh yeah, it was cool too, thanks warcrow!

No it doesnt

 

[Ornery]

Then, HTF did I manage to watch it dipshlt?

 

[warcrow]

Originally posted by: Ornery

Originally posted by: Shockwave

Originally posted by: Brutuskend
It crashed IE for me...

Your browser, like you, is Old and Busted. You need to upgrade to the New Hotness. Well, at least upgrade the browser anyways....

:roll:

Oh brother. Runs fine on my PIII Celeron with Win98 and IE6

Edit: Oh yeah, it was cool too, thanks warcrow!

NP!

 

[Buttzilla]

wow, just wow.

 

[Gagabiji]

That was VERY cool...

 

[Rudee]

I could watch an entire movie on that.

 

[chibchakan]

Originally posted by: wkabel23

Originally posted by: warcrow
Linkage!


You must have quicktime

never

QuickTime Alternative 1.32

 

[warcrow]

Originally posted by: Rudee
I could watch an entire movie on that.

Thats what I was think'n! Bring it on!

 

[simms]

So what happened?

 

[warcrow]

Originally posted by: simms
So what happened?

...with what, sir?

 

[TommyVercetti]

So how long does it take to make something like this? What is this though, I mean is this part of a bigger plot?

 

[TechnoKid]

nice CG, but one thing i've always noticed about [any] CG is that the footsteps ALWAYS look like they are "floating" on the ground instead of atcually stepping on the ground.

 

[warcrow]

Originally posted by: TechnoKid
nice CG, but one thing i've always noticed about [any] CG is that the footsteps ALWAYS look like they are "floating" on the ground instead of atcually stepping on the ground.

Yea, this is also common in video games as well. It seems like its a little tough to represent "weight" in most comupter generated imageing.

 

[TechnoKid]

Originally posted by: warcrow

Originally posted by: TechnoKid
nice CG, but one thing i've always noticed about [any] CG is that the footsteps ALWAYS look like they are "floating" on the ground instead of atcually stepping on the ground.

Yea, this is also common in video games as well. It seems like its a little tough to represent "weight" in most comupter generated imageing.

my guess is that there is enough pixels as is, adding this extra step would require many many more pixels and perhaps even triple the rendering time.

 

[Renob]

Will watch when I get home.

 

[warcrow]

Originally posted by: TechnoKid

Originally posted by: warcrow

Originally posted by: TechnoKid
nice CG, but one thing i've always noticed about [any] CG is that the footsteps ALWAYS look like they are "floating" on the ground instead of atcually stepping on the ground.

Yea, this is also common in video games as well. It seems like its a little tough to represent "weight" in most comupter generated imageing.

my guess is that there is enough pixels as is, adding this extra step would require many many more pixels and perhaps even triple the rendering time.

Nah, I disagree. It has to do with the animation. The animation applied to the models represents the movement whether is running, walking, talking....

 

[TechnoKid]

Originally posted by: warcrow

Originally posted by: TechnoKid

Originally posted by: warcrow

Originally posted by: TechnoKid
nice CG, but one thing i've always noticed about [any] CG is that the footsteps ALWAYS look like they are "floating" on the ground instead of atcually stepping on the ground.

Yea, this is also common in video games as well. It seems like its a little tough to represent "weight" in most comupter generated imageing.

my guess is that there is enough pixels as is, adding this extra step would require many many more pixels and perhaps even triple the rendering time.

Nah, I disagree. It has to do with the animation. The animation applied to the models represents the movement whether is running, walking, talking....

ahh i now see what you are talking about. like say how there should be a "slight" vibration/motion blur/jitter of the say, moving foot across the ground to make the step more realisitic? shrek and some other CG movies seemed to get this stepping on the ground thing pretty good.

 

[warcrow]

Originally posted by: TechnoKid

Originally posted by: warcrow

Originally posted by: TechnoKid

Originally posted by: warcrow

Originally posted by: TechnoKid
nice CG, but one thing i've always noticed about [any] CG is that the footsteps ALWAYS look like they are "floating" on the ground instead of atcually stepping on the ground.

Yea, this is also common in video games as well. It seems like its a little tough to represent "weight" in most comupter generated imageing.

my guess is that there is enough pixels as is, adding this extra step would require many many more pixels and perhaps even triple the rendering time.

Nah, I disagree. It has to do with the animation. The animation applied to the models represents the movement whether is running, walking, talking....

ahh i now see what you are talking about. like say how there should be a "slight" vibration/motion blur/jitter of the say, moving foot across the ground to make the step more realisitic? shrek and some other CG movies seemed to get this stepping on the ground thing pretty good.

I want to see it in games, though. When you hit someone with a rocket, they fly back, hit a wall....I want to see them *BOOM* hit, arms flight up...legs jet foward a bit...body josle (sp?)....you know? Its not really convinceing yet.

 

[slydecix]

awesome

 

[azncoffeeboi]

ty for the link ness. It was crashing my browser too.