That's why I said I personally dont find the design appealing or the bike as a whole very practical. I recognize that the design is sound and I understand why it has a super long wheelbase.
Again, Practical design...yes. Practical machine...no.
I can also see the majority of the people riding one of these not wearing any sort of protective gear and I don't agree with that. But that's there choice, just like it's their choice to spend a large amount of money on a bike like this one.
EDIT: Couldn't find any performance specs. Any ideas?
Assuming no engine upgrades other than the turbo, it should be around 160 pony's where the rubber meets the road. That's assuming eight pounds of boost. You can get quite a bit more out of them with increased boost, but you give up reliability. Handling is more of a guess. He reduced the front end rake with custom triple trees, installed Ohlins forks and rear shocks, moved his pipe up, and it looks like he trimmed the radiator shroud. It's probably around a 38 degree lean angle, maybe a bit more. Stock is 34. It will never be a canyon carver, but it was never intended to be.
The only thing I'd change on that bike is the turbo. I'd dump it (assuming I had a bucket of money I needed to use up in a hurry) and make it into a 1440cc stroker. You'd get the same horsepower without all the plumbing.