Originally posted by: loup garou
Originally posted by: Homerboy
i don't think Bill Gates is who this is aimed at.
another article i read explains it as, "social injustices that cause poverty or 'the excessive accumulation of wealth by a few'.
You're ruining their "taking things out of context" fun!!!
Oh I get it! They mean that becoming obscenely rich and not giving back to those in need is a sin, man, if only there was a word to describe that...it would be so much more convenient and wouldn't cause confusion.
Originally posted by: Aikouka
Originally posted by: BlinderBomber
I believe you mean four14een.
Well, we've already had the first seven, so let's just get the second seven now!
Originally posted by: Anubis
the nazi pope making up new sins..... interesting
Originally posted by: pontifex
is that a foam pope finger? lol
did "God tell them these are new sins" or did they just make them up themselves?
meh. i just say "religion lol" to fit in with the rest of you trolls. i'm not religious per se, but the dicks that troll religion threads annoy me far more than the zealots.Originally posted by: clamum
Originally posted by: meltdown75
religion lolHaha, yeah the above about sums up my thoughts.Originally posted by: Kadarin
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Those who don't believe in sin.. just move along, nothing for you to see here.
To quote the late Robert Heinlein,
?Sin lies only in hurting other people unnecessarily. All other "sins" are invented nonsense. (Hurting yourself is not sinful - just stupid).?
The Church, as usual, is wrong, IMO.
Originally posted by: moshquerade
"The new lists condemns genetic modification, carrying out experiments on humans, polluting the environment, causing social injustice, causing poverty, becoming obscenely wealthy and taking drugs.
Originally posted by: hanoverphist
and i keep hearing people say that religion has to step into the current times and adjust for how society is now, not 2000 years ago. now that they are making that leap, people make fun for them assuming His Will on sin.
Originally posted by: meltdown75
meh. i just say "religion lol" to fit in with the rest of you trolls. i'm not religious per se, but the dicks that troll religion threads annoy me far more than the zealots.Originally posted by: clamum
Originally posted by: meltdown75
religion lolHaha, yeah the above about sums up my thoughts.Originally posted by: Kadarin
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Those who don't believe in sin.. just move along, nothing for you to see here.
To quote the late Robert Heinlein,
?Sin lies only in hurting other people unnecessarily. All other "sins" are invented nonsense. (Hurting yourself is not sinful - just stupid).?
The Church, as usual, is wrong, IMO.
Originally posted by: Madwand1
Originally posted by: hanoverphist
and i keep hearing people say that religion has to step into the current times and adjust for how society is now, not 2000 years ago. now that they are making that leap, people make fun for them assuming His Will on sin.
It would be perfectly reasonable for them to update the list of sins according to actions currently possible which weren't possible earlier, however, they should do that with some indication of profundity and spiritual knowledge in a way that that profundity and spiritual knowledge is shared, and thus not come across so weak.
Originally posted by: meltdown75
meh. i just say "religion lol" to fit in with the rest of you trolls. i'm not religious per se, but the dicks that troll religion threads annoy me far more than the zealots.
pound salt.Originally posted by: DangerAardvark
Originally posted by: Madwand1
Originally posted by: hanoverphist
and i keep hearing people say that religion has to step into the current times and adjust for how society is now, not 2000 years ago. now that they are making that leap, people make fun for them assuming His Will on sin.
It would be perfectly reasonable for them to update the list of sins according to actions currently possible which weren't possible earlier, however, they should do that with some indication of profundity and spiritual knowledge in a way that that profundity and spiritual knowledge is shared, and thus not come across so weak.
In other words, he should have dressed up, burned some incense and spoke in tongues first? Well, I can't argue with that. Nothing wrong with a little showmanship.
Originally posted by: meltdown75
meh. i just say "religion lol" to fit in with the rest of you trolls. i'm not religious per se, but the dicks that troll religion threads annoy me far more than the zealots.
Oh. Apparently we were supposed to take a thread on how God changed his mind seriously. If you don't think Catholicism is hilarious, you aren't paying attention.
Originally posted by: loup garou
Originally posted by: Homerboy
i don't think Bill Gates is who this is aimed at.
another article i read explains it as, "social injustices that cause poverty or 'the excessive accumulation of wealth by a few'.
You're ruining their "taking things out of context" fun!!!
Oh I get it! They mean that becoming obscenely rich and not giving back to those in need is a sin, man, if only there was a word to describe that...it would be so much more convenient and wouldn't cause confusion.
Originally posted by: DnetMHZ
Maybe they should try to enforce the "Don't touch little boys" rule a little better!
Originally posted by: soonerproud
Originally posted by: loup garou
Originally posted by: Homerboy
i don't think Bill Gates is who this is aimed at.
another article i read explains it as, "social injustices that cause poverty or 'the excessive accumulation of wealth by a few'.
You're ruining their "taking things out of context" fun!!!
Oh I get it! They mean that becoming obscenely rich and not giving back to those in need is a sin, man, if only there was a word to describe that...it would be so much more convenient and wouldn't cause confusion.
That word is Greed!
GREED
Originally posted by: Anubis
Originally posted by: soonerproud
Originally posted by: loup garou
Originally posted by: Homerboy
i don't think Bill Gates is who this is aimed at.
another article i read explains it as, "social injustices that cause poverty or 'the excessive accumulation of wealth by a few'.
You're ruining their "taking things out of context" fun!!!
Oh I get it! They mean that becoming obscenely rich and not giving back to those in need is a sin, man, if only there was a word to describe that...it would be so much more convenient and wouldn't cause confusion.
That word is Greed!
GREED
i was being sarcastic with my bill gates post, anyway yes its Greed and look its #3 of the origional 7 deadly sins
Originally posted by: soonerproud
Originally posted by: Anubis
Originally posted by: soonerproud
Originally posted by: loup garou
Originally posted by: Homerboy
i don't think Bill Gates is who this is aimed at.
another article i read explains it as, "social injustices that cause poverty or 'the excessive accumulation of wealth by a few'.
You're ruining their "taking things out of context" fun!!!
Oh I get it! They mean that becoming obscenely rich and not giving back to those in need is a sin, man, if only there was a word to describe that...it would be so much more convenient and wouldn't cause confusion.
That word is Greed!
GREED
i was being sarcastic with my bill gates post, anyway yes its Greed and look its #3 of the origional 7 deadly sins
I knew you were being sarcastic, but I was just being an asshole. :evil:
He said that two mortal sins which continued to preoccupy the Vatican were abortion, which offended ?the dignity and rights of women?, and paedophilia, which had even infected the clergy itself and so had exposed the ?human and institutional fragility of the Church?.
The mass media had ?blown up? the issue ?to discredit the Church?, but the Church itself was taking steps to deal with it.
Originally posted by: DangerAardvark
Originally posted by: Madwand1
It would be perfectly reasonable for them to update the list of sins according to actions currently possible which weren't possible earlier, however, they should do that with some indication of profundity and spiritual knowledge in a way that that profundity and spiritual knowledge is shared, and thus not come across so weak.
In other words, he should have dressed up, burned some incense and spoke in tongues first? Well, I can't argue with that. Nothing wrong with a little showmanship.
