Originally posted by: Alistar7
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: Alistar7
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: Alistar7
Originally posted by: scorp00
Originally posted by: Alistar7
Originally posted by: Alistar7
Originally posted by: scorp00
I want to get it done. I'm 25/single/no kids and from what i've read it is hard to find a doctor to do it on someone like me. I don't want kids ever, I don't even want to get married. Both for financial reasons. I make decent money and either one would cost me dearly. I hate how if an accident happens then the guy is totally at the will of the woman. If she want's to keep it then there goes tens of thousands in child support. Think there is any chance I can find a doctor to do it for me? Some of my friends have recently had kids, which makes me even more sure I don't want kids.
What if the woman decides she does not want the child, but the man does? His child is aborted and there is nothing he can do to prevent it from happening. My only qualm with abortion, a man should be able to force a woman to carry his child to term if he is willing to assume full custody and care. In that instance she should have to pay child support whether she excercises her right to be part of that childs life or not.
Still waiting for the fallout from this bomb, no takers?
I don't think he should be able to force her to carry to term, it's her body. I do believe that if I offer to pay for an abortion she should either have to get it or I should not have to ever pay any child support.
You contradicted yourself. You think you should be able to force her to have an abortion, but not carry to term, who are you to tell her what to do with "her body"? In both instances you are doing just that.
I don't buy the "its her body" arguement, it is only the vessel, it is not fundamentally and permantly damaged if she is forced to carry to term. If the man wants the child and the woman does not it should work the same as if the positions were switched, which is the protection mothers enjoy. Equal rights for both parents, not just mothers.
i see where there is some "unfairness" felt by males in this situation, but don't even go there and try to say that the woman's body is not changed after she has given birth. there are definitely some permanent changes.
A woman can recover her figure with proper diet and working out, hormonal changes, not much can be done about that. My point stands, both parents should be have the right to choose, should be given the same rights and standards, and protection under the law.
lol.
ok, how can i say this.... have you ever seen a woman's body prior to having kids and then after? let's just say the vaginal muscles will never be as tight and the boobs will never be as perky. (not to mention stretch marks) i don't care what fantasy you have about proper diet and working out, restoring it all back to exact original condition doesn't happen.
Yes I have, both directly (within 2 weeks) after giving birth and years down the road. I agree it will never be EXACTLY the same, but it is not as if she will somehow be grossly disfigured or will grow a third breast. I have also seen woman that have multiple children whose figures are damn near exactly as they were beforehand. Breasts sag with age, not only childbirth, but boob jobs are the answer there, stretch marks and any other physical differences can also be corrected with plastic surgery.
IMHO these are minor issues when compared to a fathers right to decide whether he wants to keep HIS child irregardless of the woman's decision. The "it's her body" arguement is widely misunderstood and misused when compared against the literal meaning of Roe Vs Wade. The woman's right to choose whether or not to give birth to a child already conceived was the core principle,
not the effects of pregnancy on her body.
I still stand in my belief that a father should have the same right to decide whether to keep the child if he desires. That right should apply to both parents equally, if not, it is just gender discrimination.