Tetsuo
Lifer
Originally posted by: FreshPrince
wuts everyone getting for FPS?
I get ~85fps @ 1024x768x32 with max everything
A643200+ 9600XT Cat4.2
~75 @ 1280x1024x32 with max everything, no AA/aniso
2.4c/d875pbzlk 9600pro Cat4.2
Originally posted by: FreshPrince
wuts everyone getting for FPS?
I get ~85fps @ 1024x768x32 with max everything
A643200+ 9600XT Cat4.2
Originally posted by: boomdart
Too bad the demo graphics suck 🙁
Originally posted by: Sifl
This game blows. Desert Combat > UT2004.
No, I played for the past couple of days. It's too much of a goddamn hyper fragfest with little strategy involved. It's very much an arcade FPS with little skill required, outside of point, shoot and hope it sticks.Originally posted by: CubicZirconia
Originally posted by: Sifl
This game blows. Desert Combat > UT2004.
Surely you jest? Maybe you only played the game for 5 minutes? (although I'm sure you'll say you played it for at least an hour and fairly judged it and whatnot) This game kicks ass and it offers plenty that DC doesn't. If it blows, I don't even want to think about what DC does.
BF and Mods = Old news
Yeah I also like the slower moving FPS's where people run at more realistic speeds, and requiring some thought and strategy. What good are these graphics if you don't have time to look at them?Originally posted by: Sifl
No, I played for the past couple of days. It's too much of a goddamn hyper fragfest with little strategy involved. It's very much an arcade FPS with little skill required, outside of point, shoot and hope it sticks.Originally posted by: CubicZirconia
Originally posted by: Sifl
This game blows. Desert Combat > UT2004.
Surely you jest? Maybe you only played the game for 5 minutes? (although I'm sure you'll say you played it for at least an hour and fairly judged it and whatnot) This game kicks ass and it offers plenty that DC doesn't. If it blows, I don't even want to think about what DC does.
BF and Mods = Old news
I stand by my judgement.
DC > UT2004
It runs on my laptop with a 9200 64 mb so I'm sure you will be fine. Why not just try it and find out, it's a free download.Originally posted by: fritolays
will this game run on my laptop?
I have a ATI 9200 mobile 32mb video card... please let me know.
Originally posted by: FreshPrince
ARS-Technica has a pretty good server, I was just on it. Fun time!
Btw, does anyone know where online I can find literature about the different gameplays? I have no idea how to play the new modes 😱
thx,
-FP
Originally posted by: Sifl
No, I played for the past couple of days. It's too much of a goddamn hyper fragfest with little strategy involved. It's very much an arcade FPS with little skill required, outside of point, shoot and hope it sticks.Originally posted by: CubicZirconia
Originally posted by: Sifl
This game blows. Desert Combat > UT2004.
Surely you jest? Maybe you only played the game for 5 minutes? (although I'm sure you'll say you played it for at least an hour and fairly judged it and whatnot) This game kicks ass and it offers plenty that DC doesn't. If it blows, I don't even want to think about what DC does.
BF and Mods = Old news
I stand by my judgement.
DC > UT2004
IMO, slower-moving fps's don't require any more skill. They just don't require as fast reflexes
Originally posted by: brxndxn
If this game was just a plain non-skilled arcade hyper fragfest, then there would be different top-scorers at the ends of every match. But from what I've seen, the same people get the top scores almost every time. The game requires some skill.. there's just a lot of unskilled noobs playing the demo right now.
If any of you know from UT2k3 insti-gib bombing run .. or CTF, you'd know that skill is definitely a requirement to get a high score.
IMO, slower-moving fps's don't require any more skill. They just don't require as fast reflexes. I happen to like the lightning-quick reflexes required to play UT2k3 and UT2k4.
Originally posted by: Electric Amish
As usual, UT comes out as the clear leader in FPS, IMO.
Kicking EVERY other FPS's ass! Halo, BF, CS, HL, Quake, etc....all crap compared to 2K4. 😀
Originally posted by: Sifl
No, I played for the past couple of days. It's too much of a goddamn hyper fragfest with little strategy involved. It's very much an arcade FPS with little skill required, outside of point, shoot and hope it sticks.Originally posted by: CubicZirconia
Originally posted by: Sifl
This game blows. Desert Combat > UT2004.
Surely you jest? Maybe you only played the game for 5 minutes? (although I'm sure you'll say you played it for at least an hour and fairly judged it and whatnot) This game kicks ass and it offers plenty that DC doesn't. If it blows, I don't even want to think about what DC does.
BF and Mods = Old news
I stand by my judgement.
DC > UT2004
DC doesn't strike me as the kind of game sitting in a movie theater lobby, ut2k4 does. That's all. Realistic? Well it certainly more realistic to have an apache parked in my back lawn than a raptor but my focus was mainly on the speed of it all. Of course neither are realistic, they're video games. 😉Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: Sifl
No, I played for the past couple of days. It's too much of a goddamn hyper fragfest with little strategy involved. It's very much an arcade FPS with little skill required, outside of point, shoot and hope it sticks.Originally posted by: CubicZirconia
Originally posted by: Sifl
This game blows. Desert Combat > UT2004.
Surely you jest? Maybe you only played the game for 5 minutes? (although I'm sure you'll say you played it for at least an hour and fairly judged it and whatnot) This game kicks ass and it offers plenty that DC doesn't. If it blows, I don't even want to think about what DC does.
BF and Mods = Old news
I stand by my judgement.
DC > UT2004
Wait..wait..you think DC-BF isn't an arcade FPS? .....I hope you realize it isn't realistic other than the vehicles and weapons.
Originally posted by: Sifl
DC doesn't strike me as the kind of game sitting in a movie theater lobby, ut2k4 does. That's all. Realistic? Well it certainly more realistic to have an apache parked in my back lawn than a raptor but my focus was mainly on the speed of it all. Of course neither are realistic, they're video games. 😉Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: Sifl
No, I played for the past couple of days. It's too much of a goddamn hyper fragfest with little strategy involved. It's very much an arcade FPS with little skill required, outside of point, shoot and hope it sticks.Originally posted by: CubicZirconia
Originally posted by: Sifl
This game blows. Desert Combat > UT2004.
Surely you jest? Maybe you only played the game for 5 minutes? (although I'm sure you'll say you played it for at least an hour and fairly judged it and whatnot) This game kicks ass and it offers plenty that DC doesn't. If it blows, I don't even want to think about what DC does.
BF and Mods = Old news
I stand by my judgement.
DC > UT2004
Wait..wait..you think DC-BF isn't an arcade FPS? .....I hope you realize it isn't realistic other than the vehicles and weapons.