USS Enterprise (CVN-65) 50 years old today

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

velillen

Platinum Member
Jul 12, 2006
2,120
1
81
For those wondering what is going to happen to the "Big E" i can give you some insight. She is being planned for scraping at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard. An east coast shipyard may remove everything from hanger up though. But PSNS is the only shipyard that can recycle reactors so they will get "the bottom half".

But that isn't going to be quick or easy. For reference when the USS Kitty Hawk was decommissioned it took PSNS for almost a year just to get her ready to be mothballed. Thats just how long it takes to "clean out" a carrier of all the electronics and other material to be recycled as well as drain all the systems.

As for exactly why the Big E will be scraped instead of sold as a museum. Well i believe some of that is just due to being nuclear powered and treaties. I dont think you can really just have 8 (even defueled) reactors sitting around. Then again we do have some old subs that are nuclear waiting to be cut up (and have been for a 10 years or so).

The main reason is something i couldn't find any news articles on so not really willing to say. Its pretty widely known at the Navy shipyards and by the workers though. Lets just say there is a reason that overhaul was 50% over budget and surprisingly it wasn't by the shipyard workers but instead by contractors!

As for actual cut up of Big E the estimates i have heard are 10-15 years. A lot of that is just uniqueness. These one or two boat classes didnt really have plans to follow and things were often changed on the fly. We have run into random pipes that you can identify and other random things when dissecting these old beasts. That and reactors with shared bulkheads pose interesting problems since the packages do have to be able to be moved to Hanford.

But if you think carriers are expensive dont look at submarines cost :) Close to the same costs for maintaining them on average

USS Triton (SSRN-586) designed with a 2-reactor/2-steam plant propulsion system

I got to work when we recycled the Triton. let me tell you it sucked! First everything was asbestos. Radiation controls from that period were laughable. I'd be amazed if any sailors from her were alive with no medical problems that could be related to her. They over did everything. 8 SSTG's (ships service steam generators....electricity) compared to the 2 found on our modern subs. We did find a lot of cool stuff. Found dozen of letters from the 60's, a .22 rifle with barrel sawed off, and lots of other ships items.
 
Last edited:

Pacfanweb

Lifer
Jan 2, 2000
13,158
59
91
Enterprise probably won't be a museum because there won't be much left of her after she's disemboweled to get the reactors out. They aren't going to reassemble her just so she can be towed somewhere for people to visit.
 

marvdmartian

Diamond Member
Apr 12, 2002
5,444
27
91
While I can't give away much, due to the fact that the ship is still operational (and most of the knowledge about the reactor plants is still classified), I can tell you that they won't have to "disembowel" the ship to remove the reactor plants.

Let's just say that the naval engineers of the late 50's/early 60's, when Enterprise was designed, were pretty ingenious sometimes. The way they designed things were a pain in the ass most of the time (damn spoolpieces!!!), but they were pretty ingenious when it came to refueling the reactors. They could use the same method to remove the primary plants, and leave the remainder intact. :cool:
 

BarkingGhostar

Diamond Member
Nov 20, 2009
8,410
1,617
136
Yup and she was 1 of a kind within the Nimitz class as well.
But her replacement is due in 2013 and will be the first of the Truman class of Super Carriers. I dont see her staying in service past that date as her replacment ship is nearly done.

I grew up watching her come and go from NAS Alameda in the Bay Area.

been on board her serveral times at Fleet Weeks.

Hopefully she wont be the last to carry that historic name.
I'm guessing you are not talking about the USS Harry S. Truman (CVN-75) as that is also a Nimitz class carrier. In fact, when I look on the Navy's own website I cannot find a Truman class of aircraft carrier.

And information you could provide would be nice, and I am sure the USN would enjoy as well. :colbert: