No they aren't. Perhaps when you think of Conservatives, you invent some kind of bogeyman created from a montage of extremists in your mind, but I can assure you that most of us are very normal people, generous and kind. Conservatives defend the past gains of liberals, in other words, the kinds of progress that have been shown to be effective. Society is quite literally built from the ground up this way. Not all things that have been effective in the past are applicable to the future, though, which is why progress is necessary. Tradition (conservatism) brings stability, and progress (liberalism) ushers in needed change. But not all change is good, which is why we need guardians of tradition as a fallback position.
The graph you post may or may not prove anything, and this is party why it may not show what you think it does:
Also there is the problem of vaccine injury figures being actively obscured. This whole thing with mRNA has been surreal, one of the many things that the left has seemingly switched sides on. 20 years ago you could not find a liberal who would ally themselves with Pharma, and now they defend to the death the right for these huge, predatory companies to force experimental treatments on citizens. But ever since it become known that the jab
did not stop transmission, discrimination against objectors should have ended. But of course it didn't. I think we are a long way away from knowing the true cost/benefit of this new experimental mRNA treatment. If the whole truth is ever to be known, it will be long from now and told by historians.
This is true of all people, especially ones with close held beliefs. I expect you to be fully dismissive of anything I tell you, and why could I not say it was for this same reason?
Am I being othered here? Who is this "you" that you speak of? Will I be allowed to be myself and have a range of opinions, many of which do not fit neatly into any one ideology, or is that just too much to ask for?