• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

US Soldier spends 3rd Christmas as Taliban Prisoner

Page 14 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
What we have learned is that this mutt defected to the taliban. He converted to islam and became jihadist against Americans. This turd is no POW, but chose the side of the terrorists. This administration has known this since 2010, but chose to release 5 of the worst terrorists we had detained. Obama has committed treason and those feelings are bipartisan. This is impeachable. Will it happen? Most likely not, simply because of the tsunami of riots that would take place, were he to be impeached. How anyone can be supportive of O and this administration, at this point? I don't get it. We have constant lies, coverups and a trail of scandals surrounding this pres. How can any of it be acceptable to anyone?
 
Sorry big guy with a lot of titles, no treason seen.

If someone should have been impeached it should have been Dubya for some of the things he did.

We'll have to disagree here IMHO.

He is a mutt, he'll get home and be judged.

No man left behind had been SOP since this country was founded.
 
MongGrel said:
Sorry big guy with a lot of titles, no treason seen.

If someone should have been impeached it should have been Dubya for some of the things he did.

We'll have to disagree here IMHO.

He is a mutt, he'll get home and be judged.

No man left behind had been SOP since this country was founded.
Click to expand...

Not a deserter who wanted to find, did find the terrorists and took up arms with them. This is fact.

That's what makes it treason, Obama knew this. It's in the situational reports by the intel group that tracked him. These reports were delivered to high ranking military officials who report to Obama.

Time to remove this fuck once and for all. There are a lot of high ranking military people that are very pissed at fuckstain right now, how/why do you think the sitreps were released to the press?
 
Last edited:
Fern said:
How G@d damn many of our soldiers have been killed trying to kill or capture even one such high ranking terrorist? And we let the terrorists go? Unbelievable.

So Obama turns out these 5 highly dangerous terrorists and now how many American etc lives will we lose because of it? Or do you think they are all going to retire and take up sheep herding or something?

Fern
Click to expand...

5 guys who have been in American custody for around 10 years and who have, by now, been drained of any valuable info they might have had and who now will most likely never be trusted again by the Taliban due to not knowing if any of them have been turned by the U.S.

Better check under your bed tonight. One of those scary guys might be hiding there.
 
eskimospy said:
They were former insurgents, or as we called them, "terrorists". We didn't just negotiate with these terrorists, we hired them.

I don't see a problem with it either, but then again I'm not the one that says we can't negotiate with terrorists.
Click to expand...

I would have no problem even if we hired some Taliban to swoop in and rescue Bergdahl.

I just don't see how hiring bad guys to perform some task = negotiating with terrorists for a hostage. The former encourages them to work for money and do some task you want done. The latter encourages them to grab your people as hostages for the profit. I see no similarity whatsoever.

Fern
 
spidey07 said:
Not a deserter who wanted to find, did find the terrorists and took up arms with them. This is fact.

That's what makes it treason, Obama knew this. It's in the situational reports by the intel group that tracked him. These reports were delivered to high ranking military officials who report to Obama.

Time to remove this fuck once and for all.
Click to expand...


That's besides the point atm.

I'm perfectly aware of that.
 
Whoever thinks this isn't about Obama should watch this McCain clip below.

In February of this year McCain gave an interview where he said he would support a prisoner exchange (presumably for the same 5 detainees) for Berghdal. Now he says he doesn't support it and in his words "it's not about the individuals it's about the details."

What more details do u need in a prisoner swap?

Watch the clip in this link.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/06/05/republicans-bowe-bergdahl_n_5455064.html
Click to expand...
 
emperus said:
Whoever thinks this isn't about Obama should watch this McCain clip below.

In February of this year McCain gave an interview where he said he would support a prisoner exchange (presumably for the same 5 detainees) for Berghdal. Now he says he doesn't support it and in his words "it's not about the individuals it's about the details."

What more details do u need in a prisoner swap?
Click to expand...

Who the 5 terrorists released are and the terrorist we traded for. Those details.

I simply cannot fathom how fuckstain thought this was a good idea. Then again he never surprises me anymore once you know who he really is. Then the surprise is gone and the anger grows. Mainly at the people who voted for him. Great fuck upon them all.

The bipartisian outrage over this is growing. It's glorious.
 
Last edited:
Fern said:
I would have no problem even if we hired some Taliban to swoop in and rescue Bergdahl.

I just don't see how hiring bad guys to perform some task = negotiating with terrorists for a hostage. The former encourages them to work for money and do some task you want done. The latter encourages them to grab your people as hostages for the profit. I see no similarity whatsoever.

Fern
Click to expand...

So you are okay with negotiating with "terrorists" and paying them to stop shooting at us, but are not okay with negotiating with "terrorists" for people they have captured. The similarity there should be slapping you in the face.

Additionally, how did you feel about Reagan negotiating with terrorists?
 
Catch-22 (6/10) Movie CLIP - Bomb the Ocean (1970) HD



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcmwPYCUysw


Catch - 22: Medal Ceremony

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKcFyCn-SyE




Catch - 22 Explained



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5yeGMaT3PvI


I was looking for the part where they hire the Nazis to bomb their own airfield, but I'll leave it at that.


Haven't watched Catch - 22 in awhile, seems good time to.

*edit* had forgotten, been awhile, the Nazi's hired M&M to bomb their own base to buy up all the cotton he couldn't dump at the time.
 
Last edited:
spidey07 said:
Who the 5 terrorists released are and the terrorist we traded for. Those details.

I simply cannot fathom how fuckstain thought this was a good idea. Then again he never surprises me anymore once you know who he really is. Then the surprise is gone and the anger grows. Mainly at the people who voted for him. Great fuck upon them all.

The bipartisian outrage over this is growing. It's glorious.
Click to expand...

Well if you weren't in a blind rage and watched the clip. You would notice 2 things. 1.) He was speaking of 5 prisoners the Administration wanted to release and he called them the worst of the worst. 2.) At the end of the comment he says "it's not about the individuals it's about the details". That would lead most rational people to believe that he was speaking of the same 5 prisoners he was talking about in Feb. and the same 5 prisoners the administration now released.
 
emperus said:
Well if you weren't in a blind rage and watched the clip. You would notice 2 things. 1.) He was speaking of 5 prisoners the Administration wanted to release and he called them the worst of the worst. 2.) At the end of the comment he says "it's not about the individuals it's about the details". That would lead most rational people to believe that he was speaking of the same 5 prisoners he was talking about in Feb. and the same 5 prisoners the administration now released.
Click to expand...

Well he was wrong then as he frequently is.

Nice try at deflection though. Time to focus on the this treasonous president and get that fucker out of office right fucking now.

Guess you haven't noticed the widespread BIPARTISIAN outrage at the fuckstain in the white house.

Of course this is all about obummer, he's the one that did this treasonous act. Then he trots out the parents and proudly says "look what I did!"

Yes, we see what you did you fucking traitor.
 
Last edited:
Matt1970 said:
Like just mentioned it would be nearly impossible. Plus, if we impeach Obama we get President Biden. I just threw up a little in my mouth.
Click to expand...

President commits "treason" and "it would be nearly impossible" to impeach?

Or, President does something that we originally supported and then he succeeded and we no longer support it and it was a terrible thing and we're going to scream and yell and point fingers and toss the word treason around and bad mouth the soldier, his family and even the people in the town that he's from even though we, as individuals, know nothing about the actual circumstances of the whole affair.
 
spidey07 said:
Well he was wrong then as he frequently is.

Nice try at deflection though. Time to focus on the this treasonous president and get that fucker out of office right fucking now.

Guess you haven't noticed the widespread BIPARTISIAN outrage at the fuckstain in the white house.

Of course this is all about obummer, he's the one that did this treasonous act. Then he trots out the parents and proudly says "look what I did!"

Yes, we see what you did you fucking traitor.
Click to expand...


Charles Krauthammer Supports Bergdahl Swap

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/06/05/charles-krauthammer-bergdahl-deal_n_5452003.html

\deal with it, crazy man.
 
compuwiz1 said:
What we have learned is that this mutt defected to the taliban. He converted to islam and became jihadist against Americans. This turd is no POW, but chose the side of the terrorists.
Click to expand...

The Foxnews report claims he converted AFTER his capture. This should not be considered relevant or held against him. The important question is his desertion and capture. If he was loyal to the Taliban before he deserted.
 
Jaskalas said:
The Foxnews report claims he converted AFTER his capture. This should not be considered relevant or held against him. The important question is his desertion and capture. If he was loyal to the Taliban before he deserted.
Click to expand...

There was no capture. He joined them. He went looking for them.
 
eskimospy said:
Interesting to see that you think a failure to capture us soldiers indicates a lack of desire to capture us soldiers.
Click to expand...

no dumb ass, quit mind reading you're piss poor at it. it is an indication of priorities and ability. 🙄

eskimospy said:
By that logic when we rolled over Iraq and their armed forces inflicted almost no casualties in 1991 I guess that means they didn't want to.
Click to expand...

i was there, it meant they couldn't. :whiste:

where were you?

eskimospy said:
So again, can you cite any source that backs up your claim?
Click to expand...

mine was backed up with statistics, you haven't offered shit yet. as. usual. go ply your stupidity elsewhere.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top