US official confirms Allawi shot six dead

[yllus]

Originally posted by: BBond
Sistani has a ticket he told his followers to support.

Allawi is a murderer.

Bush supports Allawi.

Bush is an accessory to murder.

LMAO! BBond, P&N's very own legal expert. 😀

 

[BBond]

Originally posted by: yllus

Originally posted by: BBond
Sistani has a ticket he told his followers to support.

Allawi is a murderer.

Bush supports Allawi.

Bush is an accessory to murder.

LMAO! BBond, P&N's very own legal expert. 😀

And yllus, P&N's own Canadian warmonger. But it's really easy to support a war when it's someone else's kid being killed, righ yllus?

 

[Miramonti]

I thought it was confirmed long ago that he killed them in the conservatory with a candlestick!

 

[yllus]

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: yllus

Originally posted by: BBond
Sistani has a ticket he told his followers to support.

Allawi is a murderer.

Bush supports Allawi.

Bush is an accessory to murder.

LMAO! BBond, P&N's very own legal expert. 😀

And yllus, P&N's own Canadian warmonger. But it's really easy to support a war when it's someone else's kid being killed, righ yllus?

*snickers* It's at least as easy as it is to pound away at a keyboard all day long in the old folks' home with nary a thought in one's skull or a fact in one's words - right BBond?

 

[BBond]

Originally posted by: yllus

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: yllus

Originally posted by: BBond
Sistani has a ticket he told his followers to support.

Allawi is a murderer.

Bush supports Allawi.

Bush is an accessory to murder.

LMAO! BBond, P&N's very own legal expert. 😀

And yllus, P&N's own Canadian warmonger. But it's really easy to support a war when it's someone else's kid being killed, righ yllus?

*snickers* It's at least as easy as it is to pound away at a keyboard all day long in the old folks' home with nary a thought in one's skull or a fact in one's words - right BBond?

Only difference is when I pound away at my keyboard no one dies as a result.

You support Bush's unprovoked aggression but you won't come from behind your keyboard and risk your life, will you. You're too important. You'll just type away and support some American kids dying for the lies you support in Iraq.

 

[mwtgg]

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Originally posted by: conjur
HA!


I predict 60% turnout among registered voters with Allawi winning out over Sistani. Many Sunnis withholding from voting.

You lose already. Al-Sistani is not a candidate.

Sistani has a ticket he told his followers to support.

Allawi is a murderer.

Bush supports Allawi.

Bush is an accessory to murder.

Wow. Nice logic.

 

[BBond]

Originally posted by: mwtgg

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Originally posted by: conjur
HA!


I predict 60% turnout among registered voters with Allawi winning out over Sistani. Many Sunnis withholding from voting.

You lose already. Al-Sistani is not a candidate.

Sistani has a ticket he told his followers to support.

Allawi is a murderer.

Bush supports Allawi.

Bush is an accessory to murder.

Wow. Nice logic.

Thanks.

 

[mwtgg]

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: mwtgg

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Originally posted by: conjur
HA!


I predict 60% turnout among registered voters with Allawi winning out over Sistani. Many Sunnis withholding from voting.

You lose already. Al-Sistani is not a candidate.

Sistani has a ticket he told his followers to support.

Allawi is a murderer.

Bush supports Allawi.

Bush is an accessory to murder.

Wow. Nice logic.

Thanks.

Anytime.

 

[BBond]

Originally posted by: mwtgg

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: mwtgg

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Originally posted by: conjur
HA!


I predict 60% turnout among registered voters with Allawi winning out over Sistani. Many Sunnis withholding from voting.

You lose already. Al-Sistani is not a candidate.

Sistani has a ticket he told his followers to support.

Allawi is a murderer.

Bush supports Allawi.

Bush is an accessory to murder.

Wow. Nice logic.

Thanks.

Anytime.

I like cookies. Allawi like guns. He shoots unarmed, bound, blindfolded suspects in the head with them. He's a murdering despot put in power by another murdering despot who people like you still find no problem in supporting.

I'll stick with my cookies. You keep supporting those murderers.

 

[yllus]

Originally posted by: BBond
Only difference is when I pound away at my keyboard no one dies as a result.

You support Bush's unprovoked aggression but you won't come from behind your keyboard and risk your life, will you. You're too important. You'll just type away and support some American kids dying for the lies you support in Iraq.

Yeah, people die as a result of posts in P&N. Thank you for this further glimpse into the world you live in.

I support factual representation of information in this forum - as P&N's biggest blunderer on that end, I end up correcting your ridiculous falsities quite often. Talk sense for once and maybe I wouldn't have cause to laugh at you.

If President Bush is a murderer and, it seems, the next worst thing to Hitler, why don't you lead the march through the streets to take back the White House? I mean, if we're going to play your moronic game where words should constitute direct action, you should probably be a general in the army of the nitwits who've come to release us from Bush and his cabal of elites. So go forth, General. Show us by your example how views should translate into action. :roll:

 

[BBond]

Originally posted by: yllus

Originally posted by: BBond
Only difference is when I pound away at my keyboard no one dies as a result.

You support Bush's unprovoked aggression but you won't come from behind your keyboard and risk your life, will you. You're too important. You'll just type away and support some American kids dying for the lies you support in Iraq.

Yeah, people die as a result of posts in P&N. Thank you for this further glimpse into the world you live in.

I support factual representation of information in this forum - as P&N's biggest blunderer on that end, I end up correcting your ridiculous falsities quite often. Talk sense for once and maybe I wouldn't have cause to laugh at you.

If President Bush is a murderer and, it seems, the next worst thing to Hitler, why don't you lead the march through the streets to take back the White House? I mean, if we're going to play your moronic game where words should constitute direct action, you should probably be a general in the army of the nitwits who've come to release us from Bush and his cabal of elites. So go forth, General. Show us by your example how views should translate into action. :roll:

I'll translate my views into action when you translate your views into action. Come on down. Join up and ship out. Iraq needs you.

Or are you, as I suspected all along, nothing but mouth? A genuine warmongering chickenhawk just like the warmongering chickenhawks you support. Got a few classes under your belt in poli sci and now you think you have the world all figured out. But you have about as much life experience as a puppy.

Better stay on the paper puppy. We don't want you making a mess we'll have to clean up later -- like the one your warmongering chickenhawk hero is making because he went off the paper in Iraq.

Here, have a treat. Mwtgg gave it to me but I saved it for my puppy.

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: yllus

Originally posted by: BBond
Only difference is when I pound away at my keyboard no one dies as a result.

You support Bush's unprovoked aggression but you won't come from behind your keyboard and risk your life, will you. You're too important. You'll just type away and support some American kids dying for the lies you support in Iraq.

Yeah, people die as a result of posts in P&N. Thank you for this further glimpse into the world you live in.

I support factual representation of information in this forum - as P&N's biggest blunderer on that end, I end up correcting your ridiculous falsities quite often. Talk sense for once and maybe I wouldn't have cause to laugh at you.

If President Bush is a murderer and, it seems, the next worst thing to Hitler, why don't you lead the march through the streets to take back the White House? I mean, if we're going to play your moronic game where words should constitute direct action, you should probably be a general in the army of the nitwits who've come to release us from Bush and his cabal of elites. So go forth, General. Show us by your example how views should translate into action. :roll:

I think Ozoned provided him a link so he could back up his talk like he expects everyone else to. Doesn't look like bob took to kindly to being shown the mirror.

Oh, and it looks like bob thinks you are his puppy. How cute. All I get to be is put on his little "[IGNORE]" list - you should feel special.🙂

CsG

 

[yllus]

Originally posted by: BBond
I'll translate my views into action when you translate your views into action. Come on down. Join up and ship out. Iraq needs you.

Or are you, as I suspected all along, nothing but mouth? A genuine warmongering chickenhawk just like the warmongering chickenhawks you support. Got a few classes under your belt in poli sci and now you think you have the world all figured out. But you have about as much life experience as a puppy.

Better stay on the paper puppy. We don't want you making a mess we'll have to clean up later -- like the one your warmongering chickenhawk hero is making because he went off the paper in Iraq.

Here, have a treat. Mwtgg gave it to me but I saved it for my puppy.

As you suspected all along? LMAO! 😀 Bob, use your bib and wipe the spittle from your mouth. There isn't a single person here who would want to learn anything from you. You're 100% drivel and think that mere age means your opinion should have weight over others. Unfortunately a three-year-old could drive a Mack truck through the 'facts' in the op-ed pieces you post up and blubber about - much less someone two decades older.

Here, let me cut up that cookie into bite-sized pieces for you, old man. We wouldn't want you choking on anything other than your classic, hyperbolic opinions. Keep it coming, you're endlessly amusing. 🙂

 

[BBond]

Originally posted by: yllus

Originally posted by: BBond
I'll translate my views into action when you translate your views into action. Come on down. Join up and ship out. Iraq needs you.

Or are you, as I suspected all along, nothing but mouth? A genuine warmongering chickenhawk just like the warmongering chickenhawks you support. Got a few classes under your belt in poli sci and now you think you have the world all figured out. But you have about as much life experience as a puppy.

Better stay on the paper puppy. We don't want you making a mess we'll have to clean up later -- like the one your warmongering chickenhawk hero is making because he went off the paper in Iraq.

Here, have a treat. Mwtgg gave it to me but I saved it for my puppy.

As you suspected all along? LMAO! 😀 Bob, use your bib and wipe the spittle from your mouth. There isn't a single person here who would want to learn anything from you. You're 100% drivel and think that mere age means your opinion should have weight over others. Unfortunately a three-year-old could drive a Mack truck through the 'facts' in the op-ed pieces you post up and blubber about - much less someone two decades older.

Here, let me cut up that cookie into bite-sized pieces for you, old man. We wouldn't want you choking on anything other than your classic, hyperbolic opinions. Keep it coming, you're endlessly amusing. 🙂

Bob? Oh, you're one of that crew. That explains alot. A chickenhawk living in fantasy world, playing your video games imagining you're a warrior in Iraq so you can impress your buddies here at P&N.

Pitiful, self important young windbag.

[IGNORE]yllus

 

[yllus]

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Oh, and it looks like bob thinks you are his puppy. How cute. All I get to be is put on his little "[IGNORE]" list - you should feel special.🙂

CsG

Oh, that would suck. With the Off Topic forum so incredibly boring lately, P&N and posters like BBond are my alternative source for amusement.

The really laughable part about this is, I'm not even a classic Republican-style conservative. I'm pro-abortion ('pro-choice' is a copout of a label), pro-public schools, a lifelong athiest and rather would have had Gore win in 2000 than President Bush. But because I recognize that Mr. Hussein was a truly bad character and needed to be dealt with sooner rather than later, I need to be shipped off to war where hopefully I can catch a bullet and be silenced. No reasonable liberal would set foot in a room with the likes of BBond, but in P&N he's found a home amongst radicals. Ah, the wonders of the Internet.

 

[yllus]

Originally posted by: BBond
[IGNORE]yllus

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!! 🙁

Hey guys, bet you a Canadian loonie I can make the guy respond to one of my posts by the end of the year. 😀

 

[BBond]

I wonder how this story will play in the Tehran Times?

They're covering Allawi and the Iraqi election as though Iran was running a candidate. 😉

Allawi in battle to keep Iraq leadership

BAGHDAD, Iraq (AP) - Ayad Allawi was handpicked by Washington as prime minister, but to stay in office he must get majority support in the parliament that will be elected in two weeks. That won't be easy. Allawi is running on a ticket that's likely to be trumped by a rival one supported by Iraq's most revered Shiite cleric. And that ticket has its own candidate for the coveted prime minister spot ? a French-educated finance minister whose party has managed the difficult task of staying on good terms with both Iran and its nemesis, the United States.

Allawi, who forged close ties with the CIA in the last of his three decades in exile, came to office last summer amid high hopes of containing the insurgency and preparing for elections.

Since then, however, the violence has intensified and the credibility of the Jan. 30 vote is in jeopardy. Many of the country's minority Sunni Arabs, who held supremacy under Saddam Hussein, are unlikely to participate either because of deteriorating security or to protest the United States' perceived influence.

The election works like this: first, Iraqis elect a 275-member national assembly on Jan. 30. Next, the assembly elects a largely ceremonial president and two deputies. Then those three choose a prime minister and the assembly ratifies their choice.

So unless one of the big groups wins an outright majority in the national assembly, Iraq will be in for a spell of horse-trading with smaller parties and independents to determine who will be prime minister and hold real power.

Ethnic and religious shadings matter greatly, and both groups have sought to appear ecumenical. Allawi's slate of candidates is a mix of Sunnis, Kurds and Shiites like himself. The rival slate is heavily Shiite but also includes the other groups.

Sistani's blessing of the rival ticket is crucial. Shiites make up about 60 percent of the country's estimated 25 million people, and most revere the Iranian-born cleric. Allawi, on the other hand, lacks a broad power base, having spent so many years abroad.

Abdul-Aziz al-Hakim, a Shiite cleric who leads Iraq's largest Shiite political party, heads the Sistani-backed ticket, but is not seeking the job of prime minister. Finance Minister Adel Abdul-Mahdi, a senior member of Hakim's Supreme Council of the Islamic Revolution in Iraq, is the designated candidate for the job.

Abdul-Mahdi worked with the Americans who directly ruled Iraq for 14 months until last June, and according to diplomats who know him, he's a seasoned politician who has reached out to Kurds and Sunni Arabs.

 

[ntdz]

What a horrible man, he executed 6 TERRORIST MURDERERS. What is with you guys? You have more sympathy for the terrorists than our own soldiers. You tout the death tolls of our soldiers as your "confirmation" that Iraq was a wrong war, and condemn Allawi for killing the very people that are murdering our soldiers and innocent Iraqi's...sigh, I don't think I'll ever understand you liberals...

 

[Rainsford]

Originally posted by: ntdz
What a horrible man, he executed 6 TERRORIST MURDERERS. What is with you guys? You have more sympathy for the terrorists than our own soldiers. You tout the death tolls of our soldiers as your "confirmation" that Iraq was a wrong war, and condemn Allawi for killing the very people that are murdering our soldiers and innocent Iraqi's...sigh, I don't think I'll ever understand you liberals...

What part of "suspected insurgents" suggested to you that they were "terrorist murderers"? For all your ranting, I'm not convinced those two are the same thing...or at least close enough to justify the current leader of Iraq executing them all.

Just because we are in a war doesn't mean we can relax our defintions of who the enemy is.

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: yllus

Originally posted by: BBond
[IGNORE]yllus

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!! 🙁

Hey guys, bet you a Canadian loonie I can make the guy respond to one of my posts by the end of the year. 😀

His puppy AND put on his "[IGNORE]" list? Dasm, you are special. Must be because you are a Canuckdian, eh? 😉

<-- jealous. 😛

CsG

 

[BBond]

Originally posted by: Rainsford

Originally posted by: ntdz
What a horrible man, he executed 6 TERRORIST MURDERERS. What is with you guys? You have more sympathy for the terrorists than our own soldiers. You tout the death tolls of our soldiers as your "confirmation" that Iraq was a wrong war, and condemn Allawi for killing the very people that are murdering our soldiers and innocent Iraqi's...sigh, I don't think I'll ever understand you liberals...

What part of "suspected insurgents" suggested to you that they were "terrorist murderers"? For all your ranting, I'm not convinced those two are the same thing...or at least close enough to justify the current leader of Iraq executing them all.

Just because we are in a war doesn't mean we can relax our defintions of who the enemy is.

When Allawi declared himself judge, jury, and executioner he became the terrorist.

This is a concept lost on the Bushies. When you do wrong, even in the name of good, it's still wrong.

 

[Ozoned]

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: yllus

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: yllus

Originally posted by: BBond
Sistani has a ticket he told his followers to support.

Allawi is a murderer.

Bush supports Allawi.

Bush is an accessory to murder.

LMAO! BBond, P&N's very own legal expert. 😀

And yllus, P&N's own Canadian warmonger. But it's really easy to support a war when it's someone else's kid being killed, righ yllus?

*snickers* It's at least as easy as it is to pound away at a keyboard all day long in the old folks' home with nary a thought in one's skull or a fact in one's words - right BBond?

Only difference is when I pound away at my keyboard no one dies as a result.

You support Bush's unprovoked aggression but you won't come from behind your keyboard and risk your life, will you. You're too important. You'll just type away and support some American kids dying for the lies you support in Iraq.

I will, Bob. When are you leaving to join the insurgency in Iraq?

 

[yllus]

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: yllus

Originally posted by: BBond
[IGNORE]yllus

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!! 🙁

Hey guys, bet you a Canadian loonie I can make the guy respond to one of my posts by the end of the year. 😀

His puppy AND put on his "[IGNORE]" list? Dasm, you are special. Must be because you are a Canuckdian, eh? 😉

<-- jealous. 😛

CsG

Yeah, aren't I special? 😀 Adding to the endlessly amusing persona of BBond is his hypocrisy in adoring the French, Germans and world community when they join his anti-Bush blubberings. Of course, when those foreigners (myself, for example) speak in opposition to his positions, we need to stop talking ASAP. *chuckle*