Originally posted by: conjur
But by extending tours of duty?
:roll:
Originally posted by: charrison
ooohhh..more unnamed sources...
Originally posted by: charrison
ooohhh..more unnamed sources...
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: charrison
ooohhh..more unnamed sources...
I would be afraid to give my name to the public too if I were a commander under this administration.
Originally posted by: BBond
We're entering month 20 of "Mission Accomplished" and it looks like the "insurgents" will continue to "Bring 'em On".
Anyone who reads the news from Iraq knows the troop levels we have there currently aren't going to end the guerilla war that Bush's ill-planned invasion led to.
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: BBond
We're entering month 20 of "Mission Accomplished" and it looks like the "insurgents" will continue to "Bring 'em On".
Anyone who reads the news from Iraq knows the troop levels we have there currently aren't going to end the guerilla war that Bush's ill-planned invasion led to.
ok, so what will it take?
Originally posted by: charrison
ooohhh..more unnamed sources...
So, you would put Saddam back in the drivers seat, huh?Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: BBond
We're entering month 20 of "Mission Accomplished" and it looks like the "insurgents" will continue to "Bring 'em On".
Anyone who reads the news from Iraq knows the troop levels we have there currently aren't going to end the guerilla war that Bush's ill-planned invasion led to.
ok, so what will it take?
I will take a trip in a time machine back to March 19, 2003 to undo the monumental screw up Bush and his band of neocon idiots perpetrated.
Considering he wasn't a threat, how is that a bad thing compared to the complete and utter fvck-up that is now called Iraq?Originally posted by: Ozoned
So, you would put Saddam back in the drivers seat, huh?
Originally posted by: Ozoned
So, you would put Saddam back in the drivers seat, huh?Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: BBond
We're entering month 20 of "Mission Accomplished" and it looks like the "insurgents" will continue to "Bring 'em On".
Anyone who reads the news from Iraq knows the troop levels we have there currently aren't going to end the guerilla war that Bush's ill-planned invasion led to.
ok, so what will it take?
I will take a trip in a time machine back to March 19, 2003 to undo the monumental screw up Bush and his band of neocon idiots perpetrated.
Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: BBond
We're entering month 20 of "Mission Accomplished" and it looks like the "insurgents" will continue to "Bring 'em On".
Anyone who reads the news from Iraq knows the troop levels we have there currently aren't going to end the guerilla war that Bush's ill-planned invasion led to.
ok, so what will it take?
It will take a trip in a time machine back to March 19, 2003 to undo the monumental screw up Bush and his band of neocon idiots perpetrated.
Originally posted by: conjur
Considering he wasn't a threat, how is that a bad thing compared to the complete and utter fvck-up that is now called Iraq?Originally posted by: Ozoned
So, you would put Saddam back in the drivers seat, huh?
Originally posted by: Ozoned
Originally posted by: conjur
Considering he wasn't a threat, how is that a bad thing compared to the complete and utter fvck-up that is now called Iraq?Originally posted by: Ozoned
So, you would put Saddam back in the drivers seat, huh?
I tend to gravitate towards rational thinking, and as such I don't entertain the notion that Saddam was not a threat.
That said, answering your question would be as ridiculous as entertaining the notion that we can go back in time and change something that has already come to pass.
In fact, my question to bbond was rhetorical with an attempt to capture for posterity the complete and utter lack of any semblance of rational thought.
With your reply and his, It would appear that I got two birds with one stone.
Heh heh.
Originally posted by: BBond
So just how was Saddam a threat? What was he going to attack us with? Spitballs?Originally posted by: Ozoned
Originally posted by: conjur
Considering he wasn't a threat, how is that a bad thing compared to the complete and utter fvck-up that is now called Iraq?Originally posted by: Ozoned
So, you would put Saddam back in the drivers seat, huh?
I tend to gravitate towards rational thinking, and as such I don't entertain the notion that Saddam was not a threat.
That said, answering your question would be as ridiculous as entertaining the notion that we can go back in time and change something that has already come to pass.
In fact, my question to bbond was rhetorical with an attempt to capture for posterity the complete and utter lack of any semblance of rational thought.
With your reply and his, It would appear that I got two birds with one stone.
Heh heh.
Originally posted by: Ozoned
Originally posted by: BBond
So just how was Saddam a threat? What was he going to attack us with? Spitballs?Originally posted by: Ozoned
Originally posted by: conjur
Considering he wasn't a threat, how is that a bad thing compared to the complete and utter fvck-up that is now called Iraq?Originally posted by: Ozoned
So, you would put Saddam back in the drivers seat, huh?
I tend to gravitate towards rational thinking, and as such I don't entertain the notion that Saddam was not a threat.
That said, answering your question would be as ridiculous as entertaining the notion that we can go back in time and change something that has already come to pass.
In fact, my question to bbond was rhetorical with an attempt to capture for posterity the complete and utter lack of any semblance of rational thought.
With your reply and his, It would appear that I got two birds with one stone.
Heh heh.
Already been discussed. Over and over and over and over and over and over with people that are actually rational. Regretably, the issue is not one that can be agreed upon. Rational people understand that. But hey you want to give it a go, I would suggest that you could start Here I'd be inclined to think that there are several threads that you could reply to. 😀