US officers see need for bigger force in Iraq

[conjur]

Originally posted by: Ozoned

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: Ozoned
So, you would put Saddam back in the drivers seat, huh?

Considering he wasn't a threat, how is that a bad thing compared to the complete and utter fvck-up that is now called Iraq?

I tend to gravitate towards rational thinking, and as such I don't entertain the notion that Saddam was not a threat.

That said, answering your question would be as ridiculous as entertaining the notion that we can go back in time and change something that has already come to pass.

In fact, my question to bbond was rhetorical with an attempt to capture for posterity the complete and utter lack of any semblance of rational thought.

With your reply and his, It would appear that I got two birds with one stone.

Heh heh.

Congratulations!

You succeeded in contradicting yourself in the first line!

 

[NightCrawler]

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: Ozoned

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: Ozoned
So, you would put Saddam back in the drivers seat, huh?

Considering he wasn't a threat, how is that a bad thing compared to the complete and utter fvck-up that is now called Iraq?

I tend to gravitate towards rational thinking, and as such I don't entertain the notion that Saddam was not a threat.

That said, answering your question would be as ridiculous as entertaining the notion that we can go back in time and change something that has already come to pass.

In fact, my question to bbond was rhetorical with an attempt to capture for posterity the complete and utter lack of any semblance of rational thought.

With your reply and his, It would appear that I got two birds with one stone.

Heh heh.

Congratulations!

You succeeded in contradicting yourself in the first line!

Yeah and your so rational Conjur 🙂

 

[charrison]

Originally posted by: NightCrawler

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: Ozoned

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: Ozoned
So, you would put Saddam back in the drivers seat, huh?

Considering he wasn't a threat, how is that a bad thing compared to the complete and utter fvck-up that is now called Iraq?

I tend to gravitate towards rational thinking, and as such I don't entertain the notion that Saddam was not a threat.

That said, answering your question would be as ridiculous as entertaining the notion that we can go back in time and change something that has already come to pass.

In fact, my question to bbond was rhetorical with an attempt to capture for posterity the complete and utter lack of any semblance of rational thought.

With your reply and his, It would appear that I got two birds with one stone.

Heh heh.

Congratulations!

You succeeded in contradicting yourself in the first line!

Yeah and your so rational Conjur 🙂

Yes according to him, you can only be rational if you see things his way. Typical liberal...