• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

US drops MOAB bomb in Afghanistan

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Militarily, the GBU-43 made a lot of sense, especially the terrain. Part of the reason to use the 43, is the same as was the case for the "Daisy Cutter" in Vietnam - it's a terror weapon (terrorizing enemy troops, not civilians). This is a very aggressive strike designed to put the spring campaign of the of insurgents on the back foot. The MSM went nuts over reporting on the "Mother Of All Bombs" - way to miss the point!

Historically, foreign affairs and especially military affairs have been the last best refuge of many presidents (CIC). It's not really a big surprise that the Trump admin turned their attention toward external affairs in light of a horrible opening bid on domestic issues.

I'd like us to leave Afghanistan, but I haven't read about any good solution to prevent it from becoming an anti-western terrorist haven.

Right now the US is stuck with lemons vis-a-vis Middle East affairs, best we can do for now is make lemonade. There are allot of fundamental instabilities that are extant in the Middle East and it has been that way for a long time. The Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and our support for the Mujaheddin kicked off a litany of miscalculation and intervention in this region that has proven disastrous.
 
Last edited:
Highly unlikely that is accurate. The MOAB is wholly produced within the military, not private contractors. They don't do unit cost numbers etc...

I'm guessing someone has conflated or extrapolated those numbers based on the production cost of the GBU-57 from Boeing. That was its development cost.
What is the military entity that does that. Have any links? Not doubting, just seems odd.
 
Highly unlikely that is accurate. The MOAB is wholly produced within the military, not private contractors. They don't do unit cost numbers etc...

I'm guessing someone has conflated or extrapolated those numbers based on the production cost of the GBU-57 from Boeing. That was its development cost.

The GBU-57 was built in house at 170K per unit, now 225K in today's dollars. What we don't know is what replacement costs would be.
 
Back
Top