witeken
Diamond Member
- Dec 25, 2013
- 3,899
- 193
- 106
TSMCs 16FF is not a real 16nm. TSMC themselves expect 15%.
That 15% is only for 16FF+.
TSMCs 16FF is not a real 16nm. TSMC themselves expect 15%.
Knights Landing looks pretty nice, and the ability to socket could help become a competitive advantage.
However, look at AMD and their FirePro W9100, 2.1 DP TFLOPS on 28nm. That's very impressive. Imagine a 16FF/+ W9100-successor. The potential could be 4-5 DP TFLOPS.
Not all FLOP/s are created equal. How many *usable* FLOP/s are there? That's where Knights Landing should excel and where NVIDIA's Tesla excels today over AMD's solutions.
This thing will also come as a standalone CPU! Was waiting for Haswell-E, but I think I'll wait for this instead since my FX8350 is still doing well.
and you right to say so ! paper sheet flops (or linpack or with any bench running in cache) are not very useful.Not all FLOP/s are created equal. How many *usable* FLOP/s are there? That's where Knights Landing should excel and where NVIDIA's Tesla excels today over AMD's solutions.
What do you use your CPU for? On anything not using the full SIMD width this is going to be dog slow.
